These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25963752)

  • 61. Multiple Frames of Reference Are Used During the Selection and Planning of a Sequential Joint Action.
    Ray M; Welsh TN
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():542. PubMed ID: 29765341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Development of motor coordination during joint action in mid-childhood.
    Satta E; Ferrari-Toniolo S; Visco-Comandini F; Caminiti R; Battaglia-Mayer A
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Oct; 105():111-122. PubMed ID: 28454687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Co-actors represent the order of each other's actions.
    Schmitz L; Vesper C; Sebanz N; Knoblich G
    Cognition; 2018 Dec; 181():65-79. PubMed ID: 30142512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Categorizing coordination from the perception of joint actions.
    Burling JM; Lu H
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Jan; 80(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 29188442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Efficiency is prioritised over fairness when distributing joint actions.
    Strachan JWA; Török G
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Oct; 210():103158. PubMed ID: 32768609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Planning for manual positioning: the end-state comfort effect for manual abduction-adduction.
    Zhang W; Rosenbaum DA
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Jan; 184(3):383-9. PubMed ID: 17763845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Evidence for a dyadic motor plan in joint action.
    Sacheli LM; Arcangeli E; Paulesu E
    Sci Rep; 2018 Mar; 8(1):5027. PubMed ID: 29567946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Does the anticipation of compatible partner reactions facilitate action planning in joint tasks?
    Müller R
    Psychol Res; 2016 Jul; 80(4):464-86. PubMed ID: 25957279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Avoiding Accidents at the Champagne Reception.
    Pezzulo G; Iodice P; Donnarumma F; Dindo H; Knoblich G
    Psychol Sci; 2017 Mar; 28(3):338-345. PubMed ID: 28103140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Intra- and interpersonal movement coordination in jointly moving a rocking board.
    Bosga J; Meulenbroek RG; Cuijpers RH
    Motor Control; 2010 Oct; 14(4):440-59. PubMed ID: 21051787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Dissociating associative and motor aspects of action understanding: Processing of dual-ended tools by 16-month-old infants.
    Ní Choisdealbha Á; Westermann G; Dunn K; Reid V
    Br J Dev Psychol; 2016 Mar; 34(1):115-31. PubMed ID: 26414113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Computing Joint Action Costs: Co-Actors Minimize the Aggregate Individual Costs in an Action Sequence.
    Török G; Stanciu O; Sebanz N; Csibra G
    Open Mind (Camb); 2021; 5():100-112. PubMed ID: 34746618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. The role of predictability in cooperative and competitive joint action.
    Glover S; Dixon P
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Apr; 43(4):644-650. PubMed ID: 28345943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Coordinated turn-and-reach movements. II. Planning in an external frame of reference.
    Pigeon P; Bortolami SB; DiZio P; Lackner JR
    J Neurophysiol; 2003 Jan; 89(1):290-303. PubMed ID: 12522180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Two Trackers Are Better than One: Information about the Co-actor's Actions and Performance Scores Contribute to the Collective Benefit in a Joint Visuospatial Task.
    Wahn B; Kingstone A; König P
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():669. PubMed ID: 28515704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. "I will fix only my own mistakes": an ERP study investigating error processing in a joint choice-RT task.
    Picton L; Saunders B; Jentzsch I
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Apr; 50(5):777-85. PubMed ID: 22269931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Individual differences in action co-representation: not personal distress or subclinical psychotic experiences but sex composition modulates joint action performance.
    van der Weiden A; Aarts H; Prikken M; van Haren NE
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Feb; 234(2):499-510. PubMed ID: 26525711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Joint-action coordination in transferring objects.
    Meulenbroek RG; Bosga J; Hulstijn M; Miedl S
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Jun; 180(2):333-43. PubMed ID: 17256158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. And yet they act together: interpersonal perception modulates visuo-motor interference and mutual adjustments during a joint-grasping task.
    Sacheli LM; Candidi M; Pavone EF; Tidoni E; Aglioti SM
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(11):e50223. PubMed ID: 23209680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. The development of tool use: Planning for end-state comfort.
    Comalli DM; Keen R; Abraham ES; Foo VJ; Lee MH; Adolph KE
    Dev Psychol; 2016 Nov; 52(11):1878-1892. PubMed ID: 27786531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.