418 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25964839)
1. The effect of renal cortical thickness on the treatment outcomes of kidney stones treated with shockwave lithotripsy.
Ng CF; Luke S; Chiu PK; Teoh JY; Wong KT; Hou SS
Korean J Urol; 2015 May; 56(5):379-85. PubMed ID: 25964839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluating the importance of mean stone density and skin-to-stone distance in predicting successful shock wave lithotripsy of renal and ureteric calculi.
Wiesenthal JD; Ghiculete D; D'A Honey RJ; Pace KT
Urol Res; 2010 Aug; 38(4):307-13. PubMed ID: 20625891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Shock wave lithotripsy success determined by skin-to-stone distance on computed tomography.
Pareek G; Hedican SP; Lee FT; Nakada SY
Urology; 2005 Nov; 66(5):941-4. PubMed ID: 16286099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A new nomogram for prediction of outcome of pediatric shock-wave lithotripsy.
Dogan HS; Altan M; Citamak B; Bozaci AC; Karabulut E; Tekgul S
J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Apr; 11(2):84.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25812469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Prospective Evaluation of High-Resolution CT Parameters in Predicting Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy Success for Upper Urinary Tract Calculi.
Abdelhamid M; Mosharafa AA; Ibrahim H; Selim HM; Hamed M; Elghoneimy MN; Salem HK; Abdelazim MS; Badawy H
J Endourol; 2016 Nov; 30(11):1227-1232. PubMed ID: 27597174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The success of shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) in treating moderate-sized (10-20 mm) renal stones.
Chung VY; Turney BW
Urolithiasis; 2016 Oct; 44(5):441-4. PubMed ID: 26743071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimization of shockwave lithotripsy use for single medium sized hard renal stone with stone density ≥ 1000 HU. A prospective study.
Elbaset MA; Taha DE; Anas M; Abouelkheir RT; Edwan M; Abdullateef M; Ashour R; Osman Y; Sheir KZ
World J Urol; 2022 Jan; 40(1):243-250. PubMed ID: 34392391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of renal anatomy on shock wave lithotripsy outcomes for lower pole kidney stones: results of a prospective multifactorial analysis controlled by computerized tomography.
Torricelli FC; Marchini GS; Yamauchi FI; Danilovic A; Vicentini FC; Srougi M; Monga M; Mazzucchi E
J Urol; 2015 Jun; 193(6):2002-7. PubMed ID: 25524240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Renal Stone Features Are More Important Than Renal Anatomy to Predict Shock Wave Lithotripsy Outcomes: Results from a Prospective Study with CT Follow-Up.
Torricelli FCM; Monga M; Yamauchi FI; Marchini GS; Danilovic A; Vicentini FC; Batagello CA; Srougi M; Nahas WC; Mazzucchi E
J Endourol; 2020 Jan; 34(1):63-67. PubMed ID: 31595801
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of Case Volume on Shock Wave Lithotripsy Outcomes: Data from the National Shock Wave Lithotripsy Database of New Zealand.
Alexander CE; Gowland S; Cadwallader J; Hopkins D; Reynard JM; Turney BW
J Endourol; 2019 Aug; 33(8):655-659. PubMed ID: 30963786
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Variation coefficient of stone density and renal cortical thickness: the parameters evaluating non-contrast computed tomography imaging for predict extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy success.
Arikan Y; Eksi M; Sungur U; Yoldas M; Keskin MZ
Urolithiasis; 2024 Apr; 52(1):53. PubMed ID: 38564004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How do stone attenuation and skin-to-stone distance in computed tomography influence the performance of shock wave lithotripsy in ureteral stone disease?
Müllhaupt G; Engeler DS; Schmid HP; Abt D
BMC Urol; 2015 Jul; 15():72. PubMed ID: 26201514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Shockwave Lithotripsy Is an Efficacious Treatment Modality for Obese Patients with Upper Ureteral Calculi: Logistic Regression and Matched-Pair Analyses from a Dedicated Center Comparing Treatment Outcomes by Skin-to-Stone Distance.
Mains EAA; Blackmur JP; Sharma AD; Gietzmann WK; El-Mokadem I; Stephenson C; Wallace S; Phipps S; Thomas BG; Tolley DA; Cutress ML
J Endourol; 2020 Apr; 34(4):487-494. PubMed ID: 32030994
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Stone attenuation and skin-to-stone distance on computed tomography predicts for stone fragmentation by shock wave lithotripsy.
Perks AE; Schuler TD; Lee J; Ghiculete D; Chung DG; D'A Honey RJ; Pace KT
Urology; 2008 Oct; 72(4):765-9. PubMed ID: 18674803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A prospective, randomized study of the clinical effects of shock wave delivery for unilateral kidney stones: 60 versus 120 shocks per minute.
Ng CF; Lo AK; Lee KW; Wong KT; Chung WY; Gohel D
J Urol; 2012 Sep; 188(3):837-42. PubMed ID: 22819406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A prospective multivariate analysis of factors predicting stone disintegration by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: the value of high-resolution noncontrast computed tomography.
El-Nahas AR; El-Assmy AM; Mansour O; Sheir KZ
Eur Urol; 2007 Jun; 51(6):1688-93; discussion 1693-4. PubMed ID: 17161522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Role of Hounsfield Unit in Predicting Outcomes of Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Renal Calculi: Outcomes of a Systematic Review.
Garg M; Johnson H; Lee SM; Rai BP; Somani B; Philip J
Curr Urol Rep; 2023 Apr; 24(4):173-185. PubMed ID: 36802317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Use Of Computed Tomography-Based Nomogram In Adult Age Patients To Predict Success Rates After Shock Wave Lithotripsy For Renal Stones: A Single Center Experience.
Iqbal N; Hasan A; Singh G; Hassan MH; Nazar A; Khilan MH; Malik SI; Khawaja MA; Akhter S; Iqbal D; Khan F
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2021; 33(3):386-392. PubMed ID: 34487643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of computed tomography findings for success prediction after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for urinary tract stone disease.
Celik S; Bozkurt O; Kaya FG; Egriboyun S; Demir O; Secil M; Celebi I
Int Urol Nephrol; 2015 Jan; 47(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 25311505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ureteral stenting can be a negative predictor for successful outcome following shock wave lithotripsy in patients with ureteral stones.
Kang DH; Cho KS; Ham WS; Chung DY; Kwon JK; Choi YD; Lee JY
Investig Clin Urol; 2016 Nov; 57(6):408-416. PubMed ID: 27847914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
