BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25965303)

  • 1. Comparison between fingerprints of the epidermis and dermis: Perspectives in the identifying of corpses.
    Mizokami LL; Silva LR; Kückelhaus SA
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Jul; 252():77-81. PubMed ID: 25965303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biological foundations for forensic identifications based on fingerprints.
    Dankmeijer J; Waltman JM; de Wilde AG
    Acta Morphol Neerl Scand; 1980 Mar; 18(1):67-83. PubMed ID: 7395553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biological variability of the minutiae in the fingerprints of a sample of the Spanish population.
    Gutiérrez E; Galera V; Martínez JM; Alonso C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Oct; 172(2-3):98-105. PubMed ID: 17289319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Study of fingerprints in Argentina population for application in personal identification.
    Rivaldería N; Gutiérrez-Redomero E; Alonso-Rodríguez C; Dipierri JE; Martín LM
    Sci Justice; 2017 May; 57(3):199-208. PubMed ID: 28454629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Use of Levels One and Two Dermatoglyphics for Sex Identification in University of Ibadan Community, Southwest Nigeria.
    Adetona MO; Preyor E
    Niger J Physiol Sci; 2023 Dec; 38(2):121-124. PubMed ID: 38696686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Longitudinal and retrospective study has demonstrated morphometric variations in the fingerprints of elderly individuals.
    Silva LR; Mizokami LL; Vieira PR; Kuckelhaus SA
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Feb; 259():41-6. PubMed ID: 26734989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fingerprint matching using the onion peeling approach and turning function.
    Padkan N; Bigham BS; Faraji MR
    Gene Expr Patterns; 2023 Mar; 47():119299. PubMed ID: 36513184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sex differences in fingerprint ridge density in a Turkish young adult population: a sample of Baskent University.
    Oktem H; Kurkcuoglu A; Pelin IC; Yazici AC; Aktaş G; Altunay F
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2015 May; 32():34-8. PubMed ID: 25882147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Latent fingerprint matching.
    Jain AK; Feng J
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2011 Jan; 33(1):88-100. PubMed ID: 21088321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Distribution of the Minutiae in Hypothenar Palm Prints in Slovak Adults: Indications for Personal Identification.
    Kondeková M; Beňuš R; Masnicová S; Švábová P
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Jul; 65(4):1303-1309. PubMed ID: 32073656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Introducing a semi-automatic method to simulate large numbers of forensic fingermarks for research on fingerprint identification.
    Rodriguez CM; de Jongh A; Meuwly D
    J Forensic Sci; 2012 Mar; 57(2):334-42. PubMed ID: 22103733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. From template to image: reconstructing fingerprints from minutiae points.
    Ross A; Shah J; Jain AK
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2007 Apr; 29(4):544-60. PubMed ID: 17299213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hierarchical minutiae matching for fingerprint and palmprint identification.
    Chen F; Huang X; Zhou J
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2013 Dec; 22(12):4964-71. PubMed ID: 24002001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Distribution of the minutiae in palmprints: Topological and sexual variability.
    Rivaldería N; Gutiérrez-Redomero E
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 Jan; 66(1):135-148. PubMed ID: 32966604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Distribution of the minutiae in the fingerprints of a sample of the Spanish population.
    Gutiérrez-Redomero E; Alonso-Rodríguez C; Hernández-Hurtado LE; Rodríguez-Villalba JL
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 May; 208(1-3):79-90. PubMed ID: 21146337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantifying the limits of fingerprint variability.
    Fagert M; Morris K
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Sep; 254():87-99. PubMed ID: 26197351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fingermark evidence evaluation based on automated fingerprint identification system matching scores: the effect of different types of conditioning on likelihood ratios.
    Alberink I; de Jongh A; Rodriguez C
    J Forensic Sci; 2014 Jan; 59(1):70-81. PubMed ID: 24180303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reconstructing orientation field from fingerprint minutiae to improve minutiae-matching accuracy.
    Chen F; Zhou J; Yang C
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2009 Jul; 18(7):1665-70. PubMed ID: 19414288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fingerprint comparison. II: On the development of a single fingerprint filing and searching system.
    Liu JH; Lin CH; Osterburg JW; Nicol JD
    J Forensic Sci; 1982 Apr; 27(2):305-17. PubMed ID: 7201504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Practicability of the mobile one-finger scanner Cross Match MV5 in fingerprinting of corpses: are mobile fingerprinting scanners suitable for use in mass disasters?].
    Breitmeier D; Landmesser B; Schulz Y; Albrecht K
    Arch Kriminol; 2008; 221(5-6):138-48. PubMed ID: 18663876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.