BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25966279)

  • 1. Fear expression and return of fear following threat instruction with or without direct contingency experience.
    Mertens G; Kuhn M; Raes AK; Kalisch R; De Houwer J; Lonsdorf TB
    Cogn Emot; 2016 Aug; 30(5):968-84. PubMed ID: 25966279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Potentiation of the startle reflex is in line with contingency reversal instructions rather than the conditioning history.
    Mertens G; De Houwer J
    Biol Psychol; 2016 Jan; 113():91-9. PubMed ID: 26655786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does US expectancy mediate the additive effects of CS-US pairings on contingency instructions? Results from subjective, psychophysiological and neural measures.
    Mertens G; Braem S; Kuhn M; Lonsdorf TB; van den Hout MA; Engelhard IM
    Behav Res Ther; 2018 Nov; 110():41-46. PubMed ID: 30223152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. State anxiety modulates the return of fear.
    Kuhn M; Mertens G; Lonsdorf TB
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2016 Dec; 110():194-199. PubMed ID: 27496367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Human fear conditioning is moderated by stimulus contingency instructions.
    Mertens G; Boddez Y; Krypotos AM; Engelhard IM
    Biol Psychol; 2021 Jan; 158():107994. PubMed ID: 33248154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impact of a context switch and context instructions on the return of verbally conditioned fear.
    Mertens G; De Houwer J
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2016 Jun; 51():10-8. PubMed ID: 26623519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fear-potentiated startle conditioning in humans: explicit and contextual cue conditioning following paired versus unpaired training.
    Grillon C; Davis M
    Psychophysiology; 1997 Jul; 34(4):451-8. PubMed ID: 9260498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Conditioned fear extinction and reinstatement in a human fear-potentiated startle paradigm.
    Norrholm SD; Jovanovic T; Vervliet B; Myers KM; Davis M; Rothbaum BO; Duncan EJ
    Learn Mem; 2006; 13(6):681-5. PubMed ID: 17142300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of Experiencing CS-US Pairings on Instructed Fear Reversal.
    Wisniewski D; Braem S; González-García C; De Houwer J; Brass M
    J Neurosci; 2023 Jul; 43(30):5546-5558. PubMed ID: 37414559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Do CS-US pairings actually matter? A within-subject comparison of instructed fear conditioning with and without actual CS-US pairings.
    Raes AK; De Houwer J; De Schryver M; Brass M; Kalisch R
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e84888. PubMed ID: 24465447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fear acquisition requires awareness in trace but not delay conditioning.
    Weike AI; Schupp HT; Hamm AO
    Psychophysiology; 2007 Jan; 44(1):170-80. PubMed ID: 17241153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interoceptive fear conditioning and panic disorder: the role of conditioned stimulus-unconditioned stimulus predictability.
    Acheson DT; Forsyth JP; Moses E
    Behav Ther; 2012 Mar; 43(1):174-89. PubMed ID: 22304889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Enhancing effects of contingency instructions on fear acquisition and extinction in anxiety disorders.
    Duits P; Richter J; Baas JMP; Engelhard IM; Limberg-Thiesen A; Heitland I; Hamm AO; Cath DC
    J Abnorm Psychol; 2017 May; 126(4):378-391. PubMed ID: 28414478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cross-US reinstatement of human conditioned fear: return of old fears or emergence of new ones?
    Sokol N; Lovibond PF
    Behav Res Ther; 2012 May; 50(5):313-22. PubMed ID: 22459730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fearing shades of grey: individual differences in fear responding towards generalisation stimuli.
    Arnaudova I; Krypotos AM; Effting M; Kindt M; Beckers T
    Cogn Emot; 2017 Sep; 31(6):1181-1196. PubMed ID: 27405100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reinstatement of contextual anxiety in humans: Effects of state anxiety.
    Glotzbach-Schoon E; Andreatta M; Mühlberger A; Pauli P
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Dec; 98(3 Pt 2):557-66. PubMed ID: 26232063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Experimental boundary conditions of reinstatement-induced return of fear in humans: Is reinstatement in humans what we think it is?
    Sjouwerman R; Lonsdorf TB
    Psychophysiology; 2020 May; 57(5):e13549. PubMed ID: 32072648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fear-potentiated startle processing in humans: Parallel fMRI and orbicularis EMG assessment during cue conditioning and extinction.
    Lindner K; Neubert J; Pfannmöller J; Lotze M; Hamm AO; Wendt J
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Dec; 98(3 Pt 2):535-45. PubMed ID: 25725377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reinstatement of fear in humans: autonomic and experiential responses in a differential conditioning paradigm.
    Kull S; Müller BH; Blechert J; Wilhelm FH; Michael T
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 May; 140(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 22445769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fear conditioning following a unilateral anterior temporal lobectomy: reduced autonomic responding and stimulus contingency knowledge.
    Coppens E; van Paesschen W; Vandenbulcke M; Vansteenwegen D
    Acta Neurol Belg; 2010 Mar; 110(1):36-48. PubMed ID: 20514925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.