These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25966342)

  • 1. Do incompatible arguments cause extensive processing in the evaluation of arguments? The role of congruence between argument compatibility and argument quality.
    Liu CH; Lee HW; Huang PS; Chen HC; Sommers S
    Br J Psychol; 2016 Feb; 107(1):179-98. PubMed ID: 25966342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating arguments during instigations of defence motivation and accuracy motivation.
    Liu CH
    Br J Psychol; 2017 May; 108(2):296-317. PubMed ID: 26973222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Discounting testimony with the argument ad hominem and a Bayesian congruent prior model.
    Bhatia JS; Oaksford M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Sep; 41(5):1548-59. PubMed ID: 26147667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modeling the effects of argument length and validity on inductive and deductive reasoning.
    Rotello CM; Heit E
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1317-30. PubMed ID: 19686024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of argument structure on judgements of argument strength, function, and adequacy.
    Ricco RB
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Apr; 61(4):641-64. PubMed ID: 18938280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Two kinds of reasoning.
    Rips LJ
    Psychol Sci; 2001 Mar; 12(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 11340921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Judgments of grammaticality of Japanese simple sentences involving two arguments in a whole-part relation: a further examination of Chomsky's principle of Full Interpretation.
    Nagata H
    Percept Mot Skills; 2006 Jun; 102(3):855-70. PubMed ID: 16916165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating science arguments: evidence, uncertainty, and argument strength.
    Corner A; Hahn U
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Sep; 15(3):199-212. PubMed ID: 19751071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Belief bias is response bias: Evidence from a two-step signal detection model.
    Stephens RG; Dunn JC; Hayes BK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Feb; 45(2):320-332. PubMed ID: 30047766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Why is logic so likeable? A single-process account of argument evaluation with logic and liking judgments.
    Hayes BK; Wei P; Dunn JC; Stephens RG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Apr; 46(4):699-719. PubMed ID: 31343253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The impact of repetition-induced familiarity on agreement with weak and strong arguments.
    Moons WG; Mackie DM; Garcia-Marques T
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Jan; 96(1):32-44. PubMed ID: 19210062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The relevance framework for category-based induction: Evidence from garden-path arguments.
    Feeney A; Coley JD; Crisp A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):906-19. PubMed ID: 20565209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The macrostructure of informal arguments: a proposed model and analysis.
    Ricco RB
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Aug; 56(6):1021-51. PubMed ID: 12881169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The pursuit of self-interest: self-interest bias in attitude judgment and persuasion.
    Darke PR; Chaiken S
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2005 Dec; 89(6):864-83. PubMed ID: 16393021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Raising argument strength using negative evidence: a constraint on models of induction.
    Heussen D; Voorspoels W; Verheyen S; Storms G; Hampton JA
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Nov; 39(8):1496-507. PubMed ID: 21604094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Judgments of grammaticality of sentences with a differing number of arguments: a comparison of English and Japanese speakers.
    Nagata H; Bain B
    Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Oct; 91(2):503-11. PubMed ID: 11065310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Judgments of grammaticality of sentences violating the principle of full interpretation: a further exploration.
    Nagata H
    Percept Mot Skills; 2003 Oct; 97(2):477-82. PubMed ID: 14620235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A good tennis player does not lose matches. The effects of valence congruency in processing stance-argument pairs.
    Kamoen N; Mos MBJ
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(11):e0224481. PubMed ID: 31689306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. (Non-)Arguments in Long-Distance Extractions.
    Nyvad AM; Kizach J; Christensen KR
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2015 Oct; 44(5):519-31. PubMed ID: 24817671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing the belief bias effect with ROCs: it's a response bias effect.
    Dube C; Rotello CM; Heit E
    Psychol Rev; 2010 Jul; 117(3):831-63. PubMed ID: 20658855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.