These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25966488)

  • 1. Automating risk of bias assessment for clinical trials.
    Marshall IJ; Kuiper J; Wallace BC
    IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2015 Jul; 19(4):1406-12. PubMed ID: 25966488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. RobotReviewer: evaluation of a system for automatically assessing bias in clinical trials.
    Marshall IJ; Kuiper J; Wallace BC
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2016 Jan; 23(1):193-201. PubMed ID: 26104742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evidence based evaluation of immuno-coagulatory interventions in critical care.
    Afshari A
    Dan Med Bull; 2011 Sep; 58(9):B4316. PubMed ID: 21893014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automating Quality Assessment of Medical Evidence in Systematic Reviews: Model Development and Validation Study.
    Šuster S; Baldwin T; Lau JH; Jimeno Yepes A; Martinez Iraola D; Otmakhova Y; Verspoor K
    J Med Internet Res; 2023 Mar; 25():e35568. PubMed ID: 36722350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Machine learning to help researchers evaluate biases in clinical trials: a prospective, randomized user study.
    Soboczenski F; Trikalinos TA; Kuiper J; Bias RG; Wallace BC; Marshall IJ
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2019 May; 19(1):96. PubMed ID: 31068178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automating risk of bias assessment in systematic reviews: a real-time mixed methods comparison of human researchers to a machine learning system.
    Jardim PSJ; Rose CJ; Ames HM; Echavez JFM; Van de Velde S; Muller AE
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Jun; 22(1):167. PubMed ID: 35676632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Extracting PICO Sentences from Clinical Trial Reports using
    Wallace BC; Kuiper J; Sharma A; Zhu MB; Marshall IJ
    J Mach Learn Res; 2016; 17():. PubMed ID: 27746703
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Bias risk assessment: (3) Revised Cochrane bias risk assessment tool for individual randomized, cross-over trials (RoB2.0)].
    Wu SS; Sun F; Zhan SY
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Oct; 38(10):1436-1440. PubMed ID: 29060995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: methodological approaches to evaluate the literature and establish best evidence.
    Skelly AC; Hashimoto RE; Norvell DC; Dettori JR; Fischer DJ; Wilson JR; Tetreault LA; Fehlings MG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Oct; 38(22 Suppl 1):S9-18. PubMed ID: 24026148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of risk of bias in randomized clinical trials in surgery.
    Gurusamy KS; Gluud C; Nikolova D; Davidson BR
    Br J Surg; 2009 Apr; 96(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 19283747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Systematic reviews of randomised clinical trials examining the effects of psychotherapeutic interventions versus "no intervention" for acute major depressive disorder and a randomised trial examining the effects of "third wave" cognitive therapy versus mentalization-based treatment for acute major depressive disorder.
    Jakobsen JC
    Dan Med J; 2014 Oct; 61(10):B4942. PubMed ID: 25283628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ethical pitfalls in neonatal comparative effectiveness trials.
    Modi N
    Neonatology; 2014; 105(4):350-1. PubMed ID: 24931328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Methodology for the systematic reviews on an adjacent segment pathology.
    Norvell DC; Dettori JR; Skelly AC; Riew KD; Chapman JR; Anderson PA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Oct; 37(22 Suppl):S10-7. PubMed ID: 22872224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A meta-epidemiological study to examine the association between bias and treatment effects in neonatal trials.
    Bialy L; Vandermeer B; Lacaze-Masmonteil T; Dryden DM; Hartling L
    Evid Based Child Health; 2014 Dec; 9(4):1052-9. PubMed ID: 25504975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Towards identifying intervention arms in randomized controlled trials: extracting coordinating constructions.
    Chung GY
    J Biomed Inform; 2009 Oct; 42(5):790-800. PubMed ID: 19166975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of the risk of bias in rehabilitation reviews.
    Farmer SE; Wood D; Swain ID; Pandyan AD
    Int J Rehabil Res; 2012 Dec; 35(4):317-22. PubMed ID: 22760115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Testing a tool for assessing the risk of bias for nonrandomized studies showed moderate reliability and promising validity.
    Kim SY; Park JE; Lee YJ; Seo HJ; Sheen SS; Hahn S; Jang BH; Son HJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Apr; 66(4):408-14. PubMed ID: 23337781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.