These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
24. Soft tissue cephalometric norms for a North Indian population group using Legan and Burstone analysis. Jain P; Kalra JP Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 40(3):255-9. PubMed ID: 20965694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Perceptions of a balanced facial profile. Czarnecki ST; Nanda RS; Currier GF Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Aug; 104(2):180-7. PubMed ID: 8338071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Longitudinal study of cephalometric soft tissue profile traits between the ages of 6 and 18 years. Bergman RT; Waschak J; Borzabadi-Farahani A; Murphy NC Angle Orthod; 2014 Jan; 84(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 23834271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluation of preferred lip position according to different tip rotations of the nose in class I young adult subjects. Feghali J; Khoury E; Souccar NM; Akl R; Ghoubril J Int Orthod; 2019 Sep; 17(3):478-487. PubMed ID: 31231000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of soft-tissue profiles in Le Fort I osteotomy patients with Dolphin and Maxilim softwares. Nadjmi N; Tehranchi A; Azami N; Saedi B; Mollemans W Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Nov; 144(5):654-62. PubMed ID: 24182581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The role of the nose and cranial base in profile assessment: a morphological comparison between native African and Caucasian samples. Dandajena T; Chung KW SADJ; 2012 Aug; 67(7):394-9. PubMed ID: 23951800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [A comparative study of cephalometric evaluation criteria of the cutaneous profile]. De Coster T Orthod Fr; 1991; 62 Pt 2():559-72. PubMed ID: 1749613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Three-dimensional photographic analysis of the face in European adults from southern Spain with normal occlusion: reference anthropometric measurements. Menéndez López-Mateos ML; Carreño-Carreño J; Palma JC; Alarcón JA; Menéndez López-Mateos C; Menéndez-Núñez M BMC Oral Health; 2019 Aug; 19(1):196. PubMed ID: 31462244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue facial profile of Turkish adults. Malkoç S; Demir A; Uysal T; Canbuldu N Eur J Orthod; 2009 Apr; 31(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 19064675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Standards of soft tissue Arnett analysis for surgical planning in Turkish adults. Uysal T; Yagci A; Basciftci FA; Sisman Y Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):449-56. PubMed ID: 19482876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The Sudanese female face: normative craniofacial measurements and comparison with African-American and North American White females. Salah M; Higzi MA; Ali RW; Naini FB J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1704-9. PubMed ID: 25012648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A lateral cephalometric analysis of the adult nose. Begg RJ; Harkness M J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1995 Nov; 53(11):1268-74; discussion 1274-5. PubMed ID: 7562191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Photometric analysis of esthetically pleasant and unpleasant facial profile. Fortes HN; Guimarães TC; Belo IM; da Matta EN Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(2):66-75. PubMed ID: 24945516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. An evaluation of the nasolabial angle and the relative inclinations of the nose and upper lip. Fitzgerald JP; Nanda RS; Currier GF Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Oct; 102(4):328-34. PubMed ID: 1456217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]