362 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25967603)
1. Whole-Slide Imaging of Pap Cellblock Preparations Is a Potentially Valid Screening Method.
Tawfik O; Davis M; Dillon S; Tawfik L; Diaz FJ; Amin K; Fan F
Acta Cytol; 2015; 59(2):187-200. PubMed ID: 25967603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Significance of p16/Ki-67 double immunocytochemical staining in cervical cytology ASCUS, LSIL, and ASC-H].
Wu Y; Zhao J; Hu J; Wu XW; Zhu LR
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Nov; 52(11):734-739. PubMed ID: 29179267
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic value of endocervical curettage for detecting dysplastic lesions in women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) and low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) Papanicolaou smears.
Poomtavorn Y; Suwannarurk K; Thaweekul Y; Maireang K
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(8):3461-4. PubMed ID: 24870740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Expression of p16 INK4A in Papanicolaou smears containing atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance from the uterine cervix.
Nieh S; Chen SF; Chu TY; Lai HC; Fu E
Gynecol Oncol; 2003 Oct; 91(1):201-8. PubMed ID: 14529682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Utility of p16 Immunohistochemistry in Evaluating Negative Cervical Biopsies Following High-risk Pap Test Results.
Shain AF; Kwok S; Folkins AK; Kong CS
Am J Surg Pathol; 2018 Jan; 42(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 29112019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluating cytology for the detection of invasive cervical cancer.
Landy R; Castanon A; Hamilton W; Lim AW; Dudding N; Hollingworth A; Sasieni PD
Cytopathology; 2016 Jun; 27(3):201-9. PubMed ID: 26126636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Virologic versus cytologic triage of women with equivocal Pap smears: a meta-analysis of the accuracy to detect high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia.
Arbyn M; Buntinx F; Van Ranst M; Paraskevaidis E; Martin-Hirsch P; Dillner J
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Feb; 96(4):280-93. PubMed ID: 14970277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interobserver variability: comparison between liquid-based and conventional preparations in gynecologic cytology.
Chhieng DC; Talley LI; Roberson J; Gatscha RM; Jhala NC; Elgert PA
Cancer; 2002 Apr; 96(2):67-73. PubMed ID: 11954023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Characteristic findings of cervical Papanicolaou tests from transgender patients on androgen therapy: Challenges in detecting dysplasia.
Adkins BD; Barlow AB; Jack A; Schultenover SJ; Desouki MM; Coogan AC; Weiss VL
Cytopathology; 2018 Jun; 29(3):281-287. PubMed ID: 29488269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The significance of the Papanicolaou smear diagnosis of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Nasser SM; Cibas ES; Crum CP; Faquin WC
Cancer; 2003 Oct; 99(5):272-6. PubMed ID: 14579293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the SurePath liquid-based Papanicolaou smear with the conventional Papanicolaou smear in a multisite direct-to-vial study.
Fremont-Smith M; Marino J; Griffin B; Spencer L; Bolick D
Cancer; 2004 Oct; 102(5):269-79. PubMed ID: 15386329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An automated quantitative DNA image cytometry system detects abnormal cells in cervical cytology with high sensitivity.
Wong OG; Ho MW; Tsun OK; Ng AK; Tsui EY; Chow JN; Ip PP; Cheung AN
Cytopathology; 2018 Jun; 29(3):267-274. PubMed ID: 29578257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Performance of Aptima and Cobas HPV testing platforms in detecting high-grade cervical dysplasia and cancer.
Ge Y; Christensen P; Luna E; Armylagos D; Schwartz MR; Mody DR
Cancer Cytopathol; 2017 Aug; 125(8):652-657. PubMed ID: 28574670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is the human papillomavirus test in combination with the Papanicolaou test useful for management of patients with diagnoses of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance/low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions?
Lee NW; Kim D; Park JT; Kim A
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2001 Nov; 125(11):1453-7. PubMed ID: 11698001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Difference Between Cryotherapy and Follow Up Low Grade Squamous Lesion of Cervix Uteri.
Jahic M; Jahic E; Mulavdic M; Hadzimehmedovic A
Med Arch; 2017 Aug; 71(4):280-283. PubMed ID: 28974850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cervical Pap screening among Israeli women, 2005-2010.
Bassal R; Schejter E; Bachar R; Shapira H; Sandbank J; Supino Rosin L; Schvimer M; Cohen D; Keinan-Boker L
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Mar; 289(3):615-22. PubMed ID: 24085583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quality metrics in cervical cytopathology: A single institutional study.
Senthil Kumar D; Ravikumar G
Cytopathology; 2022 Mar; 33(2):230-235. PubMed ID: 34854153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, cannot rule out high-grade lesion: Diagnosis, histological outcomes and human papillomavirus results.
Segura SE; Ramos-Rivera G; Hakima L; Suhrland M; Khader S
Cytopathology; 2019 Jan; 30(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 30187975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Liquid-based cytology and conventional cervical smears: a comparison study in an Asian screening population.
Cheung AN; Szeto EF; Leung BS; Khoo US; Ng AW
Cancer; 2003 Dec; 99(6):331-5. PubMed ID: 14681939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reflex high-risk human papilloma virus DNA test is useful in the triage of women with atypical squamous cells cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Wu HH; Allen SL; Kirkpatrick JL; Elsheikh TM
Diagn Cytopathol; 2006 Oct; 34(10):707-10. PubMed ID: 16955480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
