These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2596812)

  • 1. [Value of a new non-ionic contrast medium, iopromide 300 in renal arteriography using an arterial route. Comparative study with ioxaglate 320 mgI/ml].
    Laval-Jeantet M; Martin-Bouyer Y
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1989; 32(4 Pt 2):344-6. PubMed ID: 2596812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Digital arteriography using an intra-arterial route in vertebrobasilar insufficiency. Comparison of iopromide 300 and ioxaglate 320 mgI/ml].
    Arnaud O; Salamon G
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1989; 32(4 Pt 2):339-41. PubMed ID: 2688531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Iopromide 370 in coronaroventriculography, versus ioxaglate 320 mg/ml].
    Petitier H
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1989; 32(4 Pt 2):333-5. PubMed ID: 2688529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Phlebography of the lower limbs: comparative trial of iopromide 370 and ioxaglate 320 mgI/ml].
    Lasjaunias P
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1989; 32(4 Pt 2):347-53. PubMed ID: 2688532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Pediatric angiocardiography. Randomized, controlled study of 2 iodinated contrast media: iopromide 300 and ioxaglate 320 mgI/ml].
    Amiel M; Revel D
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1989; 32(4 Pt 2):336-8. PubMed ID: 2688530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Tolerability of a new non-ionic contrast medium, iopromide in x-ray computed tomography. Comparison with ioxaglate 320 mgI/ml].
    Fredy D; Heitz F; Mathieu D; Vasile N
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1989; 32(4 Pt 2):358-60. PubMed ID: 2688533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Contrast media in peripheral angiography: does cost reduction mean loss of quality and safety? A reevaluation based on a randomized double-blind comparative study of ioxaglate versus iopromide].
    Lammer J; Winkelbauer F; Thurnher S; Wildling R; Farres MT; Woessmer B
    Rofo; 1996 May; 164(5):432-6. PubMed ID: 8634406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adverse reactions of low osmolar non-ionic and ionic contrast media when used together or separately during percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Juergens CP; Khaing AM; McIntyre GJ; Leung DY; Lo ST; Fernandes C; Hopkins AP
    Heart Lung Circ; 2005 Sep; 14(3):172-7. PubMed ID: 16352273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Iopromide 300 and 370. Meta-analysis of a randomized prospective clinical trial conducted in France in 1987. Overall results of tolerability and efficacy].
    Broussel R
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1989; 32(4 Pt 2):329-32. PubMed ID: 2688528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Haemostatic effects of low osmolar non-ionic and ionic contrast media: a double-blind comparative study.
    Hoffmann JJ; Tielbeek AV; Krause W
    Br J Radiol; 2000 Mar; 73(867):248-55. PubMed ID: 10817039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Renal effects of CO2 and iodinated contrast media in patients undergoing renovascular intervention: a prospective, randomized study.
    Liss P; Eklöf H; Hellberg O; Hägg A; Boström-Ardin A; Löfberg AM; Olsson U; Orndahl P; Nilsson H; Hansell P; Eriksson LG; Bergqvist D; Nyman R
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2005 Jan; 16(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 15640411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of sodium-meglumine ioxaglate and iopromide in coronary angiography.
    Neiss AC; Barth P; Chastin I; Erdmann E
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1989; 32(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 2662884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of monoionic and nonionic radiographic contrast media on cutaneous microcirculation in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease.
    Franzeck UK; Schalch I; Seiler Y; Schneider E; Bollinger A
    Microvasc Res; 1995 Jul; 50(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 7476576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A double-blind study comparing safety, tolerability and efficacy of iodixanol 320 mgI/ml and ioxaglate 320 mgI/ml in cerebral arteriography.
    Palmers Y; De Greef D; Grynne BH; Smits J; Put E
    Eur J Radiol; 1993 Nov; 17(3):203-9. PubMed ID: 8293750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Iohexol vs. ioxaglate in lower extremity angiography: a comparative randomized double-blind study in 80 patients.
    Krouwels MM; Overbosch EH; Guit GL
    Eur J Radiol; 1996 May; 22(2):133-5. PubMed ID: 8793433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Iohexol and ioxaglate in peripheral angiography.
    Stiris MG; Laerum F
    Acta Radiol; 1987; 28(6):767-70. PubMed ID: 2962617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of radiographic contrast media on pulmonary vascular resistance of normoxic and chronically hypoxic pulmonary hypertensive rats.
    Emery CJ; Fang L; Laude EA; Morcos SK
    Br J Radiol; 2001 Dec; 74(888):1109-17. PubMed ID: 11777768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Iohexol and iopromide--two new non-ionic water-soluble radiographic contrast media: randomized, intraindividual double-blind study versus ioxaglate in peripheral angiography.
    Hagen B
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1983; 118():107-14. PubMed ID: 6139064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pain in peripheral arteriography: an assessment of conventional versus ionic and non-ionic low-osmolality contrast agents.
    Murphy G; Campbell DR; Fraser DB
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 1988 Jun; 39(2):103-6. PubMed ID: 2967829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Iopromide, a new contrast medium for angiography. Clinical study and comparison with other low-osmolar contrast media].
    Steidle B; Wolf KJ; Banzer D; Seyferath W
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1984 Aug; 109(34):1275-8. PubMed ID: 6381018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.