These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2596812)
21. Nonionic low-osmolar contrast media have no impact on major adverse cardiac events in patients undergoing coronary stenting with appropriate antiplatelet therapy. Danzi GB; Capuano C; Sesana M; Predolini S; Baglini R Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2003 Dec; 60(4):477-82. PubMed ID: 14624424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Iohexol, ioxaglate and iopamidol in coronary angiography. A double-blind comparative study of 300 patients. Soiva M; Hekali P; Keto P; Karumo J; Salonen O; Heikkilä J Australas Radiol; 1991 May; 35(2):109-11. PubMed ID: 1930006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Changes in renal function immediately after the angiography]. Murakami R; Tajima H; Kumazaki T Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 Jun; 54(7):605-12. PubMed ID: 8065882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Iodixanol in femoral arteriography (phase III): a comparative double-blind parallel trial between iodixanol and iopromide. Pugh ND; Sissons GR; Ruttley MS; Berg KJ; Nossen JO; Eide H Clin Radiol; 1993 Feb; 47(2):96-9. PubMed ID: 8435972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Comparison between iopamidol and ioxaglate in digital arteriography of the lower limbs]. Cercueil JP; Krausé D; Reynaud M; Lamazière I; Charmasson L; Lerais JM; Aho S J Radiol; 1996 Sep; 77(9):643-7. PubMed ID: 8944120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Risk of thrombosis during coronary angioplasty with low osmolality contrast media. Esplugas E; Cequier A; Jara F; Mauri J; Soler T; Sala J; Sabate X Am J Cardiol; 1991 Oct; 68(10):1020-4. PubMed ID: 1927914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Immediate and delayed tolerance of iohexol and ioxaglate in lower limb phlebography: a double-blind comparative study in humans. Bertrand P; Delhommais A; Alison D; Rouleau P Acad Radiol; 1995 Aug; 2(8):683-6. PubMed ID: 9419625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Miscellaneous adverse effects of low-versus high-osmolality contrast media: a study revised. Brismar J; Jacobsson BF; Jorulf H Radiology; 1991 Apr; 179(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 1826061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A double-blind study of iopromide 300 for peripheral arteriography. Results of a multi-institutional comparison of iopromide with iohexol and iopamidol. Druy EM; Bettmann MA; Jeans W Invest Radiol; 1994 May; 29 Suppl 1():S102-5; discussion S106. PubMed ID: 8071036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Comparative studies of diatrizoate, ioxaglate and iohexol as angiocardiographic contrast media]. Esplugas E; Torrents A; Mauri J; Jara F Rev Esp Cardiol; 1989 Mar; 42(3):173-6. PubMed ID: 2781110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Clinical experience with iobitridol 250-300 in digital subtraction angiography. Double-blind randomized studies vs. iopromide and iohexol. Bouard JC; Lyonnet D; Illes JP; Bouard-Monnier C; Rouviere O; Pangaud C Acta Radiol Suppl; 1996; 400():85-8. PubMed ID: 8619361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Double-blind study of a new nonionic contrast agent for digital subtraction arteriography. Weiss JP; McLean GK; Modic MT; Rees CR; Higashida RT Invest Radiol; 1994 May; 29 Suppl 1():S84-92. PubMed ID: 8071051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of iohexol and ioxaglate in selective coronary angiography. Haagen FD; Lok D; Pasteuning H Can J Cardiol; 1987 Nov; 3 Suppl A():16A-20A. PubMed ID: 3435850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A comparison of the efficacy and safety of ioxaglate and iobitridol in renal angioplasty. Dieu V; Joffre F; Krause D; Bartoli JM; Lyonnet D; Veyret C; Garcier JM; Boyer L Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2000; 23(2):91-6. PubMed ID: 10795832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A comparative study of the nephrotoxicity of iohexol, iopamidol and ioxaglate in peripheral angiography. Campbell DR; Flemming BK; Mason WF; Jackson SA; Hirsch DJ; MacDonald KJ Can Assoc Radiol J; 1990 Jun; 41(3):133-7. PubMed ID: 2354386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Iodixanol in leg phlebography: a randomized, double-blind parallel group phase III trial comparing iodixanol to ioxaglate. Sapoval MR; Beyssen BM; Girardot C; Musset MA; Legmann P; Brekke O; Gaux JC Clin Radiol; 1996 Mar; 51(3):210-3. PubMed ID: 8605753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison between the efficacy of dimeric and monomeric non-ionic contrast media (iodixanol vs iopromide) in urography in patients with mild to moderate renal insufficiency. Stacul F; Cova M; Assante M; Hougens Grynne B; Haider T Br J Radiol; 1998 Sep; 71(849):918-22. PubMed ID: 10195004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of ionic and nonionic low-osmolar contrast media in coronary arteriography. A crossover study in children. Saito H; Kimura K; Takamiya M; Yamamoto K; Ohta M; Yamagami H; Kamiya T Invest Radiol; 1988 Dec; 23(12):910-3. PubMed ID: 3203992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Acute cardiac tolerance of current contrast media and the new taxane protaxel using iopromide as carrier during porcine coronary angiography and stenting. Scheller B; Speck U; Schmitt A; Clauss W; Sovak M; Böhm M; Stoll HP Invest Radiol; 2002 Jan; 37(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 11753151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The effect of radiographic contrast media on human vascular smooth muscle cells. Wang YX; Chan P; Morcos SK Br J Radiol; 1998 Apr; 71(844):376-80. PubMed ID: 9659129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]