These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

287 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25968916)

  • 1. Single-lead portable ECG devices: Perceptions and clinical accuracy compared to conventional cardiac monitoring.
    Mehta DD; Nazir NT; Trohman RG; Volgman AS
    J Electrocardiol; 2015; 48(4):710-6. PubMed ID: 25968916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. ECG patch monitors for assessment of cardiac rhythm abnormalities.
    Lobodzinski SS
    Prog Cardiovasc Dis; 2013; 56(2):224-9. PubMed ID: 24215754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quality of ECG monitoring with a miniature ECG recorder.
    Janata A; Lemmert ME; Russell JK; Gehman S; Fleischhackl R; Robak O; Pernicka E; Sterz F; Gorgels AP
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2008 Jun; 31(6):676-84. PubMed ID: 18507539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic accuracy of a new detection algorithm for atrial fibrillation in cardiac telemonitoring with portable electrocardiogram devices.
    Winkler S; Axmann C; Schannor B; Kim S; Leuthold T; Scherf M; Downes R; Nettlau H; Koehler F
    J Electrocardiol; 2011; 44(4):460-4. PubMed ID: 21419421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Long-term electrocardiography: value and reliability of various systems].
    Bethge KP; Gonska BD
    Z Kardiol; 1985 Oct; 74(10):567-79. PubMed ID: 2416139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prospective, multicentre validation of a simple, patient-operated electrocardiographic system for the detection of arrhythmias and electrocardiographic changes.
    Kaleschke G; Hoffmann B; Drewitz I; Steinbeck G; Naebauer M; Goette A; Breithardt G; Kirchhof P
    Europace; 2009 Oct; 11(10):1362-8. PubMed ID: 19797150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison between EASI system 12-lead ECGs and standard 12-lead ECGs for improved clinical nursing practice.
    Lancia L; Pisegna Cerone M; Vittorini P; Romano S; Penco M
    J Clin Nurs; 2008 Feb; 17(3):370-7. PubMed ID: 18205693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of diagnostic value using a small, single channel, P-wave centric sternal ECG monitoring patch with a standard 3-lead Holter system over 24 hours.
    Smith WM; Riddell F; Madon M; Gleva MJ
    Am Heart J; 2017 Mar; 185():67-73. PubMed ID: 28267477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Errors in the computerized electrocardiogram interpretation of cardiac rhythm.
    Shah AP; Rubin SA
    J Electrocardiol; 2007; 40(5):385-90. PubMed ID: 17531257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Utility and accuracy of a smartphone-based electrocardiogram device as compared to a standard base-apex electrocardiogram in the horse.
    Kraus MS; Rishniw M; Divers TJ; Reef VB; Gelzer AR
    Res Vet Sci; 2019 Aug; 125():141-147. PubMed ID: 31228737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multi-purpose ECG telemetry system.
    Marouf M; Vukomanovic G; Saranovac L; Bozic M
    Biomed Eng Online; 2017 Jun; 16(1):80. PubMed ID: 28629374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of a smartphone-based ECG recording system with a standard cardiac event monitor in the investigation of palpitations in children.
    Macinnes M; Martin N; Fulton H; McLeod KA
    Arch Dis Child; 2019 Jan; 104(1):43-47. PubMed ID: 29860228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Where do derived precordial leads fail?
    Gregg RE; Zhou SH; Lindauer JM; Feild DQ; Helfenbein ED
    J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(6):546-52. PubMed ID: 18817921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Development of a portable ECG monitor based on TMS320VC5402].
    Liu CG; Zhang YH; Bai J; Hu P
    Space Med Med Eng (Beijing); 2004 Apr; 17(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 15920835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Validity of telephone ECG multichannel transmission].
    Dirschedl P; Lenz S; Löllgen H; Fahrenkrog U
    Z Kardiol; 1996 Sep; 85(9):677-83. PubMed ID: 8992812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical value of ambulatory rhythm monitoring.
    Chung EK
    Cardiovasc Clin; 1980; 11(1):113-126. PubMed ID: 7438143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The quality of ECG data acquisition, and diagnostic performance of a novel adhesive patch for ambulatory cardiac rhythm monitoring in arrhythmia detection.
    Karaoğuz MR; Yurtseven E; Aslan G; Deliormanlı BG; Adıgüzel Ö; Gönen M; Li KM; Yılmaz EN
    J Electrocardiol; 2019; 54():28-35. PubMed ID: 30851474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Can the heartscan be used for diagnosis and monitoring of emergencies in general practice?
    Renier W; Geelen M; Steverlynck L; Wauters J; Aertgeerts B; Verbakel J; Vanbrabant P; Gillet JB; Sabbe M; Buntinx F
    Acta Cardiol; 2012 Oct; 67(5):525-31. PubMed ID: 23252002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the patient-activated event recording system vs. traditional 24 h Holter electrocardiography in individuals with paroxysmal palpitations or dizziness.
    de Asmundis C; Conte G; Sieira J; Chierchia GB; Rodriguez-Manero M; Di Giovanni G; Ciconte G; Levinstein M; Baltogiannis G; Saitoh Y; Casado-Arroyo R; Brugada P
    Europace; 2014 Aug; 16(8):1231-5. PubMed ID: 24574492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Development of a portable ambulatory ECG monitor based on embedded microprocessor unit].
    Wang DX; Wang GJ
    Space Med Med Eng (Beijing); 2005 Jun; 18(3):196-200. PubMed ID: 16161276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.