These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25970660)
1. Altered Psychological Responses to Different Magnitudes of Deception during Cycling. Williams EL; Jones HS; Sparks SA; Midgley AW; Marchant DC; Bridge CA; McNaughton LR Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2015 Nov; 47(11):2423-30. PubMed ID: 25970660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Deception has no acute or residual effect on cycling time trial performance but negatively effects perceptual responses. Jones HS; Williams EL; Marchant DC; Sparks SA; Bridge CA; Midgley AW; Mc Naughton LR J Sci Med Sport; 2016 Sep; 19(9):771-6. PubMed ID: 26726003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Increased Fatigue Response to Augmented Deceptive Feedback during Cycling Time Trial. Ducrocq GP; Hureau TJ; Meste O; Blain GM Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2017 Aug; 49(8):1541-1551. PubMed ID: 28319585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Distance-dependent association of affect with pacing strategy in cycling time trials. Jones HS; Williams EL; Marchant D; Sparks SA; Midgley AW; Bridge CA; McNaughton L Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2015 Apr; 47(4):825-32. PubMed ID: 25121516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Deceptive Manipulation of Competitive Starting Strategies Influences Subsequent Pacing, Physiological Status, and Perceptual Responses during Cycling Time Trials. Williams EL; Jones HS; Sparks SA; Marchant DC; Midgley AW; Bridge CA; McNaughton LR Front Physiol; 2016; 7():536. PubMed ID: 27891098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Deception Improves Time Trial Performance in Well-trained Cyclists without Augmented Fatigue. Ansdell P; Thomas K; Howatson G; Amann M; Goodall S Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2018 Apr; 50(4):809-816. PubMed ID: 29117071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Exploring the performance reserve: Effect of different magnitudes of power output deception on 4,000 m cycling time-trial performance. Stone MR; Thomas K; Wilkinson M; Stevenson E; St Clair Gibson A; Jones AM; Thompson KG PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0173120. PubMed ID: 28278174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Using Deception to Establish a Reproducible Improvement in 4-Km Cycling Time Trial Performance. Shei RJ; Thompson K; Chapman R; Raglin J; Mickleborough T Int J Sports Med; 2016 May; 37(5):341-6. PubMed ID: 26855435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improvements in Cycling Time Trial Performance Are Not Sustained Following the Acute Provision of Challenging and Deceptive Feedback. Jones HS; Williams EL; Marchant D; Sparks SA; Bridge CA; Midgley AW; Mc Naughton LR Front Physiol; 2016; 7():399. PubMed ID: 27713701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Competitor presence reduces internal attentional focus and improves 16.1km cycling time trial performance. Williams EL; Jones HS; Andy Sparks S; Marchant DC; Midgley AW; Mc Naughton LR J Sci Med Sport; 2015 Jul; 18(4):486-91. PubMed ID: 25085709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Potential to Change Pacing and Performance During 4000-m Cycling Time Trials Using Hyperoxia and Inspired Gas-Content Deception. Davies MJ; Clark B; Garvican-Lewis LA; Welvaert M; Gore CJ; Thompson KG Int J Sports Physiol Perform; 2019 Jul; 14(7):949-957. PubMed ID: 30676139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Augmenting performance feedback does not affect 4 km cycling time-trials in the heat. Waldron M; Villerius V; Murphy A J Sports Sci; 2015; 33(8):786-94. PubMed ID: 25397352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of deception and expected exercise duration on psychological and physiological variables during treadmill running and cycling. Eston R; Stansfield R; Westoby P; Parfitt G Psychophysiology; 2012 Apr; 49(4):462-9. PubMed ID: 22220852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Information Acquisition Differences between Experienced and Novice Time Trial Cyclists. Boya M; Foulsham T; Hettinga F; Parry D; Williams E; Jones H; Sparks A; Marchant D; Ellison P; Bridge C; McNaughton L; Micklewright D Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2017 Sep; 49(9):1884-1898. PubMed ID: 28441164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Perceptual cues in the regulation of exercise performance - physical sensations of exercise and awareness of effort interact as separate cues. Swart J; Lindsay TR; Lambert MI; Brown JC; Noakes TD Br J Sports Med; 2012 Jan; 46(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 21948124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of deceptive running speed on physiology, perceptual responses, and performance during sprint-distance triathlon. Taylor D; Smith MF Physiol Behav; 2014 Jun; 133():45-52. PubMed ID: 24825782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improvement of 10-km time-trial cycling with motivational self-talk compared with neutral self-talk. Barwood MJ; Corbett J; Wagstaff CR; McVeigh D; Thelwell RC Int J Sports Physiol Perform; 2015 Mar; 10(2):166-71. PubMed ID: 25010539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of distance feedback on pacing strategy and perceived exertion during cycling. Albertus Y; Tucker R; St Clair Gibson A; Lambert EV; Hampson DB; Noakes TD Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2005 Mar; 37(3):461-8. PubMed ID: 15741846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Manipulation effects of prior exercise intensity feedback by the Borg scale during open-loop cycling. Pires FO; Hammond J Br J Sports Med; 2012 Jan; 46(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 21266335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of training-induced fatigue on pacing patterns in 40-km cycling time trials. Skorski S; Hammes D; Schwindling S; Veith S; Pfeiffer M; Ferrauti A; Kellmann M; Meyer T Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2015 Mar; 47(3):593-600. PubMed ID: 25003772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]