BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2597095)

  • 1. Influence of stimulus intensity on AEP components in the 80- to 200-millisecond latency range.
    Adler G; Adler J
    Audiology; 1989; 28(6):316-24. PubMed ID: 2597095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Auditory stimulus processing at different stimulus intensities as reflected by auditory evoked potentials.
    Adler G; Adler J
    Biol Psychiatry; 1991 Feb; 29(4):347-56. PubMed ID: 2036478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Age and features of cortical auditory evoked potentials].
    Novikova LA; Rybalko NV
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1982; 32(6):1132-9. PubMed ID: 7164578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cortical evoked potentials in response to brief modulation of signal amplitude. Experiments on auditory temporal resolution.
    von Wedel H
    Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1982; 234(3):235-43. PubMed ID: 7115196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tonotopic organization of human auditory cortex revealed by multi-channel SQUID system.
    Yamamoto T; Uemura T; Llinás R
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1992; 112(2):201-4. PubMed ID: 1604979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Auditory evoked potentials to indifferent and meaningful stimuli in young children].
    Ibatullina AA
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1983; 33(4):632-8. PubMed ID: 6624247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Compound action potentials recorded from the intracranial portion of the auditory nerve in man: effects of stimulus intensity and polarity.
    Møller AR; Jho HD
    Audiology; 1991; 30(3):142-63. PubMed ID: 1953444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The perception of temporal structure and auditory evoked brain activity.
    Skrandies W; Rammsayer T
    Biol Psychol; 1995 Jun; 40(3):267-80. PubMed ID: 7669836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Effect of Intensity on the Speech Evoked Auditory Late Latency Response in Normal Hearing Individuals.
    Prakash H; Abraham A; Rajashekar B; Yerraguntla K
    J Int Adv Otol; 2016 Apr; 12(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 27340986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of sex differences on event-related potentials in young adults.
    Gölgeli A; Süer C; Ozesmi C; Dolu N; Aşcioğlu M; Sahin O
    Int J Neurosci; 1999 Aug; 99(1-4):69-77. PubMed ID: 10495197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The relationship between latency of auditory evoked potentials, simple reaction time, and stimulus intensity.
    Jaskowski P; Rybarczyk K; Jaroszyk F
    Psychol Res; 1994; 56(2):59-65. PubMed ID: 8153244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Evoked potentials of the sensomotor and parietal areas of the cortex to tonal stimuli in the cat].
    Kulikov GA; Klimenko VIu; Vasil'eva LA; Petrzhek IM
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1984; 34(1):89-97. PubMed ID: 6711134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. T complex hemispheric asymmetries: effects of stimulus intensity.
    Cacace AT; Dowman R; Wolpaw JR
    Hear Res; 1988 Aug; 34(3):225-32. PubMed ID: 3170365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intensity coding of auditory stimuli: an fMRI study.
    Jäncke L; Shah NJ; Posse S; Grosse-Ryuken M; Müller-Gärtner HW
    Neuropsychologia; 1998 Sep; 36(9):875-83. PubMed ID: 9740361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of frontal and temporal-parietal lesions on the auditory evoked potential in man.
    Knight RT; Hillyard SA; Woods DL; Neville HJ
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1980 Oct; 50(1-2):112-24. PubMed ID: 6159179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Long-latency event-related potentials in rats: effects of task and stimulus parameters.
    Ehlers CL; Kaneko WM; Robledo P; Lopez AL
    Neuroscience; 1994 Oct; 62(3):759-69. PubMed ID: 7870304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The impact of motor activity on intracerebral ERPs: P3 latency variability in modified auditory odd-ball paradigms involving a motor task.
    Kanovský P; Streitová H; Klajblová H; Bares M; Daniel P; Rektor I
    Neurophysiol Clin; 2003 Sep; 33(4):159-68. PubMed ID: 14519543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Habituation and the human evoked potential.
    Megela AL; Teyler TJ
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1979 Dec; 93(6):1154-70. PubMed ID: 521525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Simultaneous recording of auditory evoked potentials. Relationships among the fast, middle and long latency components.
    Arslan E; Prosser S; Michelini S
    Scand Audiol; 1984; 13(2):75-81. PubMed ID: 6463555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The influence of recognition of a visual stimulus on evoked potentials of the projection and non-projection areas of the cerebral cortex].
    Gorev AS
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1975; 25(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 1210678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.