These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2597095)

  • 21. The evoked K-complex: all-or-none phenomenon?
    Bastien C; Campbell K
    Sleep; 1992 Jun; 15(3):236-45. PubMed ID: 1621024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Anatomic organization of evoked potentials in rat parietotemporal cortex: somatosensory and auditory responses.
    Barth DS; Kithas J; Di S
    J Neurophysiol; 1993 Jun; 69(6):1837-49. PubMed ID: 8394409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Representation of concurrent acoustic objects in primary auditory cortex.
    Dyson BJ; Alain C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Jan; 115(1):280-8. PubMed ID: 14759021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Transient brain responses predict the temporal dynamics of sound detection in humans.
    Mäkinen V; May P; Tiitinen H
    Neuroimage; 2004 Feb; 21(2):701-6. PubMed ID: 14980572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Differential contribution of frontal and temporal cortices to auditory change detection: fMRI and ERP results.
    Opitz B; Rinne T; Mecklinger A; von Cramon DY; Schröger E
    Neuroimage; 2002 Jan; 15(1):167-74. PubMed ID: 11771985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Late auditory evoked potentials asymmetry revisited.
    Hine J; Debener S
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Jun; 118(6):1274-85. PubMed ID: 17462945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The augmenting/reducing phenomenon in the auditory evoked potential.
    Prescott J; Connolly JF; Gruzelier JH
    Biol Psychol; 1984 Aug; 19(1):31-44. PubMed ID: 6478002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Temporal integration affects intensity change detection in human auditory cortex.
    Soeta Y; Nakagawa S
    Neuroreport; 2010 Dec; 21(18):1157-61. PubMed ID: 20938362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparing auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) to toneburst and narrow band CE-chirp in young infants.
    Rodrigues GR; Ramos N; Lewis DR
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Sep; 77(9):1555-60. PubMed ID: 23915488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of hearing aid amplification and stimulus intensity on cortical auditory evoked potentials.
    Billings CJ; Tremblay KL; Souza PE; Binns MA
    Audiol Neurootol; 2007; 12(4):234-46. PubMed ID: 17389790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Temporal stream of cortical representation for auditory spatial localization in human hemispheres.
    Itoh K; Yumoto M; Uno A; Kurauchi T; Kaga K
    Neurosci Lett; 2000 Oct; 292(3):215-9. PubMed ID: 11018315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Development of auditory-evoked potentials in the cat. III. Wave amplitudes.
    Walsh EJ; McGee J; Javel E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Mar; 79(3):745-54. PubMed ID: 3007596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Latency of auditory evoked field deflection N100m ruled by pitch or spectrum?
    Lütkenhöner B; Lammertmann C; Knecht S
    Audiol Neurootol; 2001; 6(5):263-78. PubMed ID: 11729329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Frequency-dependent fine structure in the frequency-following response: The byproduct of multiple generators.
    Tichko P; Skoe E
    Hear Res; 2017 May; 348():1-15. PubMed ID: 28137699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Stimulus dependencies of the gerbil brain-stem auditory-evoked response (BAER). III: Additivity of click level and rate with noise level.
    Burkard R; Voigt HF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Nov; 88(5):2222-34. PubMed ID: 2269738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Gamma-band activity dissociates between matching and nonmatching stimulus pairs in an auditory delayed matching-to-sample task.
    Leiberg S; Kaiser J; Lutzenberger W
    Neuroimage; 2006 May; 30(4):1357-64. PubMed ID: 16469508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Middle latency response: frequency and intensity effects.
    Smith DI; Lee FS; Mills JH
    Hear Res; 1989 Nov; 42(2-3):293-303. PubMed ID: 2606809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Human auditory middle latency responses: influence of stimulus type and intensity.
    Borgmann C; Ross B; Draganova R; Pantev C
    Hear Res; 2001 Aug; 158(1-2):57-64. PubMed ID: 11506937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. N100 and P300 amplitude to Go and No-Go variants of the auditory oddball in siblings discordant for schizophrenia.
    Sumich A; Kumari V; Dodd P; Ettinger U; Hughes C; Zachariah E; Sharma T
    Schizophr Res; 2008 Jan; 98(1-3):265-77. PubMed ID: 18022352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Brain stem auditory-evoked response of the nonanesthetized dog.
    Marshall AE
    Am J Vet Res; 1985 Apr; 46(4):966-73. PubMed ID: 4014849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.