These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25971161)

  • 1. Reviewers: The unsung heroes of publication.
    Natarajan S
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2015 Mar; 63(3):179. PubMed ID: 25971161
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Minimizing the three stages of publication bias.
    Chalmers TC; Frank CS; Reitman D
    JAMA; 1990 Mar; 263(10):1392-5. PubMed ID: 2406473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Peer review: purpose, process and publication.
    Thistlethwaite J
    Clin Teach; 2012 Aug; 9(4):201-4. PubMed ID: 22783849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Who are the peer reviewers and how much do they review?
    Yankauer A
    JAMA; 1990 Mar; 263(10):1338-40. PubMed ID: 2304210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reference accuracy: authors', reviewers', editors', and publishers' contributions.
    Barroga EF
    J Korean Med Sci; 2014 Dec; 29(12):1587-9. PubMed ID: 25469055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Recognition for Reviewers: PUBLONS!
    Cuellar NG
    J Transcult Nurs; 2018 May; 29(3):221. PubMed ID: 29537346
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How to review a scientific paper.
    Tandon R
    Asian J Psychiatr; 2014 Oct; 11():124-7. PubMed ID: 25248566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Problems identified by secondary review of accepted manuscripts.
    Garfunkel JM; Ulshen MH; Hamrick HJ; Lawson EE
    JAMA; 1990 Mar; 263(10):1369-71. PubMed ID: 2304215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Peer reviewers: The unsung heroes of medical publishing.
    Khanduja V
    J ISAKOS; 2023 Dec; 8(6):393-395. PubMed ID: 38103915
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Becoming a peer reviewer to medical education journals.
    Azer SA; Ramani S; Peterson R
    Med Teach; 2012; 34(9):698-704. PubMed ID: 22643022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Refereed journals.
    Shaughnessy AF
    J Am Board Fam Pract; 1989; 2(4):292-3. PubMed ID: 2801200
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How does peer review work?
    Aaron L
    Radiol Technol; 2008; 79(6):553-4. PubMed ID: 18650531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The oral examinations of the American Board of Ophthalmology and the Appointment Panel System.
    Burde RM; Spencer WH
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1988 Mar; 105(3):316-7. PubMed ID: 3344789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The history and practice of peer review.
    Chapelle FH
    Ground Water; 2014; 52(1):1. PubMed ID: 24266884
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Thumbs down, thumbs up: by Caveman.
    J Cell Sci; 2014 Jan; 127(Pt 1):1-2. PubMed ID: 24520563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Peer review to ensure quality in forensic mental health publication.
    Felthous AR; Wettstein RM
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2014; 42(3):305-14. PubMed ID: 25187283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Civil Discourse and Peer Review.
    Brucker MC
    Nurs Womens Health; 2017 Dec; 21(6):421-422. PubMed ID: 29223204
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Better Serving Our Readers.
    Miller E
    Pain Manag Nurs; 2017 Oct; 18(5):269. PubMed ID: 28939100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tips for writing and publishing an article.
    Nahata MC
    Ann Pharmacother; 2008 Feb; 42(2):273-7. PubMed ID: 18212252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The academic welfare state: making peer-review count.
    Veríssimo D; Roberts DL
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2013 Nov; 28(11):623-4. PubMed ID: 23932409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.