191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25971608)
1. [The validity of routine data on quality assurance: A qualitative systematic review].
Hanisch E; Weigel TF; Buia A; Bruch HP
Chirurg; 2016 Jan; 87(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 25971608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Quality assurance using routine data. Is outcome quality now measurable?].
Kostuj T; Smektala R
Unfallchirurg; 2010 Dec; 113(12):1047-8, 1050-2. PubMed ID: 21076909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Are hospital administrative data suitable for external quality assurance? Comparison of quality indicators based on separate statutory data collections (BQS) and hospital administrative data].
Maass C; Schleiz W; Weyermann M; Drösler SE
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2011 Mar; 136(9):409-14. PubMed ID: 21344356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Quality measurement using administrative data in mandatory quality assurance].
Heller G; Szecsenyi J; Willms G; Broge B
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2014; 108(8-9):465-9. PubMed ID: 25523844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [The quality of quality indicators: Comments on the preliminary report "Sector-crossing quality assurance in the health service - colorectal cancer" of AQUA - Institute for Applied Quality Promotion and Research in Health Services].
Mroczkowski P; Kube R; Vieth M; Gastinger I; Lippert H
Zentralbl Chir; 2011 Jun; 136(3):293-5. PubMed ID: 21509718
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Quality assurance with administrative data (QSR): follow-up in quality measurement - an analysis of patient records].
Jeschke E; Günster C; Klauber J
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2015; 109(9-10):673-81. PubMed ID: 26699256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Current standards in surgery - the lead topic of the 35th Berlin Surgeons Congress held in Brandenburg an der Havel on September 2 and 3, 2010].
Mantke R
Zentralbl Chir; 2011 Jun; 136(3):291-2. PubMed ID: 21674422
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Outcome quality in rehabilitation of children and adolescents: results of project aiming at the development of a quality assurance programme].
Farin E; Gustke M; Widera T; Matthies S
Gesundheitswesen; 2012 Jun; 74(6):358-70. PubMed ID: 21761389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Measurement of medical outcome quality using administative data in Germany].
Heller G
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2008 Oct; 51(10):1173-82. PubMed ID: 18985411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Process assessment by automated computation of healthcare quality indicators in hospital electronic health records: a systematic review of indicators.
Chazard E; Babaousmail D; Schaffar A; Ficheur G; Beuscart R
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 210():867-71. PubMed ID: 25991279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [The relationship of in-hospital and post-discharge complications and implications for quality measurement in hip replacement surgery - an analysis of AOK administrative data].
Jeschke E; Heyde K; Günster C
Gesundheitswesen; 2013 May; 75(5):288-95. PubMed ID: 23184453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Hospital quality measurement—what matters?].
Mansky T; Nimptsch U
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2014; 108(8-9):487-94. PubMed ID: 25523847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Not Available].
Eberlein-Gonska M; De Meo F
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2015; 109(9-10):645-6. PubMed ID: 26699250
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Registry and health insurance claims data in vascular research and quality improvement.
Behrendt CA; Heidemann F; Rieß HC; Stoberock K; Debus SE
Vasa; 2017 Jan; 46(1):11-15. PubMed ID: 27871211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Points of view: the role of quality measurement from the Federal Joint Committee's perspective].
Klakow-Franck R
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2014; 108(8-9):456-64. PubMed ID: 25523843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Surgeon-specific performance reports in general surgery: an observational study of initial implementation and adoption.
Yi SG; Wray NP; Jones SL; Bass BL; Nishioka J; Brann S; Ashton CM
J Am Coll Surg; 2013 Oct; 217(4):636-647.e1. PubMed ID: 23816383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [The quality of the German health-care system in an international comparison - a systematic review].
Lauerer M; Emmert M; Schöffski O
Gesundheitswesen; 2013 Aug; 75(8-9):483-91. PubMed ID: 23361406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Evaluation of external quality assurance in accordance with sect. 137 SGB V at the Carl Gustav Carus university hospital in Dresden].
Petzold T; Steinwitz A; Schmitt J; Eberlein-Gonska M
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2013; 107(8):541-7. PubMed ID: 24290668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance measurement in surgery through the National Quality Forum.
Hyder JA; Roy N; Wakeam E; Hernandez R; Kim SP; Bader AM; Cima RR; Nguyen LL
J Am Coll Surg; 2014 Nov; 219(5):1037-46. PubMed ID: 25260680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparing routine administrative data with registry data for assessing quality of hospital care in patients with myocardial infarction using deterministic record linkage.
Maier B; Wagner K; Behrens S; Bruch L; Busse R; Schmidt D; Schühlen H; Thieme R; Theres H
BMC Health Serv Res; 2016 Oct; 16(1):605. PubMed ID: 27769288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
