These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25971812)

  • 21. Shifting visual attention in stereographic displays: a time course analysis.
    Iavecchia HP; Folk CL
    Hum Factors; 1994 Dec; 36(4):606-18. PubMed ID: 7875690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Depth modulation of the attentional repulsion effect.
    Chien SE; Watanabe K
    Perception; 2013; 42(12):1333-43. PubMed ID: 24649635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Surface segregation influences pre-attentive search in depth.
    Wheatley C; Cook ML; Vidyasagar TR
    Neuroreport; 2004 Feb; 15(2):303-5. PubMed ID: 15076757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Rewarded visual items capture attention only in heterogeneous contexts.
    Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Brandhofer R; Schubö A
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Jul; 53(7):1063-73. PubMed ID: 26997364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Does temporal preparation facilitate visual processing in a selective manner? Evidence from attentional capture.
    Seibold VC; Rolke B
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Sep; 151():51-61. PubMed ID: 24950348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The use of 2D and 3D displays for shape-understanding versus relative-position tasks.
    St John M; Cowen MB; Smallman HS; Oonk HM
    Hum Factors; 2001; 43(1):79-98. PubMed ID: 11482314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Visual attention and the apprehension of spatial relations: the case of depth.
    Moore CM; Elsinger CL; Lleras A
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 May; 63(4):595-606. PubMed ID: 11436732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Inhibition of return: a "depth-blind" mechanism?
    Casagrande M; Barbato M; Mereu S; Martella D; Marotta A; Theeuwes J; Collinson SL
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 May; 140(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 22465912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Toward the influence of temporal attention on the selection of targets in a visual search task: An ERP study.
    Rolke B; Festl F; Seibold VC
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Nov; 53(11):1690-1701. PubMed ID: 27479494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Computational model of stereoscopic 3D visual saliency.
    Wang J; Da Silva MP; Le Callet P; Ricordel V
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2013 Jun; 22(6):2151-65. PubMed ID: 23412612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Performance of remote target pointing hand movements in a 3D environment.
    Lee YH; Wu SK; Liu YP
    Hum Mov Sci; 2013 Jun; 32(3):511-26. PubMed ID: 23601416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Visual attention to surfaces in three-dimensional space.
    He ZJ; Nakayama K
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1995 Nov; 92(24):11155-9. PubMed ID: 7479956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The influence of depth on object selection and manipulation in visual working memory within a 3D context.
    Qian J; Fu B; Gao Z; Tan B
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38519758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of spatial position on visual search for 3-D objects.
    Umemura H; Watanabe H; Matsuoka K
    Perception; 2007; 36(8):1229-43. PubMed ID: 17972485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Search asymmetry and eye movements in infants and adults.
    Adler SA; Gallego P
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Aug; 76(6):1590-608. PubMed ID: 24858309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Interpretation of three-dimensional structure from two-dimensional endovascular images: implications for educators in vascular surgery.
    Sidhu RS; Tompa D; Jang R; Grober ED; Johnston KW; Reznick RK; Hamstra SJ
    J Vasc Surg; 2004 Jun; 39(6):1305-11. PubMed ID: 15192573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Depth-of-Focus Affects 3D Perception in Stereoscopic Displays.
    Vienne C; Blondé L; Mamassian P
    Perception; 2015; 44(6):613-27. PubMed ID: 26489206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An Evaluation of Depth and Size Perception on a Spherical Fish Tank Virtual Reality Display.
    Zhou Q; Hagemann G; Fafard D; Stavness I; Fels S
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2019 May; 25(5):2040-2049. PubMed ID: 30762553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. EEG-based cognitive load of processing events in 3D virtual worlds is lower than processing events in 2D displays.
    Dan A; Reiner M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2017 Dec; 122():75-84. PubMed ID: 27592084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. 3D Space Layout Design of Holographic Command Cabin Information Display in Mixed Reality Environment Based on HoloLens 2.
    Wang W; Hong X; Dang S; Xu N; Qu J
    Brain Sci; 2022 Jul; 12(8):. PubMed ID: 35892412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.