150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25971841)
21. In vivo volumetric analysis of coronary stent using optical coherence tomography with a novel balloon occlusion-flushing catheter: a comparison with intravascular ultrasound.
Kawase Y; Hoshino K; Yoneyama R; McGregor J; Hajjar RJ; Jang IK; Hayase M
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Oct; 31(10):1343-9. PubMed ID: 16223637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluation of IVOCT imaging of coronary artery metallic stents with neointimal coverage.
Elahi S; Ho D; Feldman MD; Dijkstra J; Milner TE
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Mar; 31(3):463-70. PubMed ID: 25395364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Ex vivo assessment of vascular response to coronary stents by optical frequency domain imaging.
Nakano M; Vorpahl M; Otsuka F; Taniwaki M; Yazdani SK; Finn AV; Ladich ER; Kolodgie FD; Virmani R
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Jan; 5(1):71-82. PubMed ID: 22239896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A formula to calculate the contrast volume required for optimal imaging quality in optical coherence tomography with non-occlusive technique.
Gutiérrez-Chico JL; Cortés C; Schincariol M; Jaguszewski M
Cardiol J; 2018; 25(5):574-581. PubMed ID: 30246237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Additive Value of Integrated Backscatter IVUS for Detection of Vulnerable Plaque by Optical Frequency Domain Imaging: An Ex Vivo Autopsy Study of Human Coronary Arteries.
Nakano M; Yahagi K; Yamamoto H; Taniwaki M; Otsuka F; Ladich ER; Joner M; Virmani R
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Feb; 9(2):163-72. PubMed ID: 26777223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound in the evaluation of observer variability and reliability in the assessment of stent deployment: the OCTIVUS study.
Magnus PC; Jayne JE; Garcia-Garcia HM; Swart M; van Es GA; Tijssen J; Kaplan AV
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Aug; 86(2):229-35. PubMed ID: 25620044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Reproducibility of coronary Fourier domain optical coherence tomography: quantitative analysis of in vivo stented coronary arteries using three different software packages.
Okamura T; Gonzalo N; Gutiérrez-Chico JL; Serruys PW; Bruining N; de Winter S; Dijkstra J; Commossaris KH; van Geuns RJ; van Soest G; Ligthart J; Regar E
EuroIntervention; 2010 Aug; 6(3):371-9. PubMed ID: 20884417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. In vivo comparison between optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound for detecting small degrees of in-stent neointima after stent implantation.
Suzuki Y; Ikeno F; Koizumi T; Tio F; Yeung AC; Yock PG; Fitzgerald PJ; Fearon WF
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2008 Apr; 1(2):168-73. PubMed ID: 19463295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Quantitative assessment of the stent/scaffold strut embedment analysis by optical coherence tomography.
Sotomi Y; Tateishi H; Suwannasom P; Dijkstra J; Eggermont J; Liu S; Tenekecioglu E; Zheng Y; Abdelghani M; Cavalcante R; de Winter RJ; Wykrzykowska JJ; Onuma Y; Serruys PW; Kimura T
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Jun; 32(6):871-83. PubMed ID: 26898315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of Stent Expansion Guided by Optical Coherence Tomography Versus Intravascular Ultrasound: The ILUMIEN II Study (Observational Study of Optical Coherence Tomography [OCT] in Patients Undergoing Fractional Flow Reserve [FFR] and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention).
Maehara A; Ben-Yehuda O; Ali Z; Wijns W; Bezerra HG; Shite J; Généreux P; Nichols M; Jenkins P; Witzenbichler B; Mintz GS; Stone GW
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Nov; 8(13):1704-14. PubMed ID: 26585621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Low-dose dual-source CT angiography with iterative reconstruction for coronary artery stent evaluation.
Eisentopf J; Achenbach S; Ulzheimer S; Layritz C; Wuest W; May M; Lell M; Ropers D; Klinghammer L; Daniel WG; Pflederer T
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Apr; 6(4):458-65. PubMed ID: 23498678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of diagnostic performance in assessing the rewiring position into a jailed side branch between online 3D reconstruction systems version 1.1 and 1.2 derived from optical frequency domain imaging.
Fujimura T; Okamura T; Furuya K; Miyazaki Y; Takenaka H; Tateishi H; Oda T; Mochizuki M; Uchinoumi H; Nishimura T; Yamada J; Yano M
Cardiovasc Interv Ther; 2020 Oct; 35(4):336-342. PubMed ID: 31707692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Factors that influence measurements and accurate evaluation of stent apposition by optical coherence tomography. Assessment using a phantom model.
Sawada T; Shite J; Negi N; Shinke T; Tanino Y; Ogasawara D; Kawamori H; Kato H; Miyoshi N; Yoshino N; Kozuki A; Koto M; Hirata K
Circ J; 2009 Oct; 73(10):1841-7. PubMed ID: 19644218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Phantom stent thrombosis: intracoronary imaging insights.
Rivero F; Cuesta J; Benedicto A; Bastante T; Rodriguez-Alcudia D; Aguilera MC; Alfonso F
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 May; 8(6):864-865. PubMed ID: 25912401
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. 3-Dimensional optical coherence tomography assessment of jailed side branches by bioresorbable vascular scaffolds: a proposal for classification.
Okamura T; Onuma Y; García-García HM; Regar E; Wykrzykowska JJ; Koolen J; Thuesen L; Windecker S; Whitbourn R; McClean DR; Ormiston JA; Serruys PW;
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Aug; 3(8):836-44. PubMed ID: 20723856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Frequency-domain optical coherence tomography assessment of unprotected left main coronary artery disease-a comparison with intravascular ultrasound.
Fujino Y; Bezerra HG; Attizzani GF; Wang W; Yamamoto H; Chamié D; Kanaya T; Mehanna E; Tahara S; Nakamura S; Costa MA
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Sep; 82(3):E173-83. PubMed ID: 23359350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Anatomically correct three-dimensional coronary artery reconstruction using frequency domain optical coherence tomographic and angiographic data: head-to-head comparison with intravascular ultrasound for endothelial shear stress assessment in humans.
Papafaklis MI; Bourantas CV; Yonetsu T; Vergallo R; Kotsia A; Nakatani S; Lakkas LS; Athanasiou LS; Naka KK; Fotiadis DI; Feldman CL; Stone PH; Serruys PW; Jang IK; Michalis LK
EuroIntervention; 2015 Aug; 11(4):407-15. PubMed ID: 24974809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The accuracy of length measurements using different intravascular ultrasound motorized transducer pullback systems.
Tanaka K; Carlier SG; Mintz GS; Sano K; Liu X; Fujii K; de Ribamar Costa J; Lui J; Moses JW; Stone GW; Leon MB
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2007 Dec; 23(6):733-8. PubMed ID: 17370139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Monoenergetic reconstructions for imaging of coronary artery stents using spectral detector CT: In-vitro experience and comparison to conventional images.
Hickethier T; Baeßler B; Kroeger JR; Doerner J; Pahn G; Maintz D; Michels G; Bunck AC
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2017; 11(1):33-39. PubMed ID: 28096049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Evaluation of coronary arterial calcification - Ex-vivo assessment by optical frequency domain imaging.
Ijichi T; Nakazawa G; Torii S; Nakano M; Yoshikawa A; Morino Y; Ikari Y
Atherosclerosis; 2015 Nov; 243(1):242-7. PubMed ID: 26408928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
