These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
667 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25972926)
1. De novo identification of differentially methylated regions in the human genome. Peters TJ; Buckley MJ; Statham AL; Pidsley R; Samaras K; V Lord R; Clark SJ; Molloy PL Epigenetics Chromatin; 2015; 8():6. PubMed ID: 25972926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of novel and existing methods for detecting differentially methylated regions. Lent S; Xu H; Wang L; Wang Z; Sarnowski C; Hivert MF; Dupuis J BMC Genet; 2018 Sep; 19(Suppl 1):84. PubMed ID: 30255775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Probe Lasso: a novel method to rope in differentially methylated regions with 450K DNA methylation data. Butcher LM; Beck S Methods; 2015 Jan; 72():21-8. PubMed ID: 25461817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A data-driven approach to preprocessing Illumina 450K methylation array data. Pidsley R; Y Wong CC; Volta M; Lunnon K; Mill J; Schalkwyk LC BMC Genomics; 2013 May; 14():293. PubMed ID: 23631413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An evaluation of the genome-wide false positive rates of common methods for identifying differentially methylated regions using illumina methylation arrays. Zheng Y; Lunetta KL; Liu C; Katrinli S; Smith AK; Miller MW; Logue MW Epigenetics; 2022 Dec; 17(13):2241-2258. PubMed ID: 36047742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Defiant: (DMRs: easy, fast, identification and ANnoTation) identifies differentially Methylated regions from iron-deficient rat hippocampus. Condon DE; Tran PV; Lien YC; Schug J; Georgieff MK; Simmons RA; Won KJ BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Feb; 19(1):31. PubMed ID: 29402210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Redundancy analysis allows improved detection of methylation changes in large genomic regions. Ruiz-Arenas C; González JR BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Dec; 18(1):553. PubMed ID: 29237399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Calling differentially methylated regions from whole genome bisulphite sequencing with DMRcate. Peters TJ; Buckley MJ; Chen Y; Smyth GK; Goodnow CC; Clark SJ Nucleic Acids Res; 2021 Nov; 49(19):e109. PubMed ID: 34320181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. HOME: a histogram based machine learning approach for effective identification of differentially methylated regions. Srivastava A; Karpievitch YV; Eichten SR; Borevitz JO; Lister R BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 May; 20(1):253. PubMed ID: 31096906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Adaptation of the targeted capture Methyl-Seq platform for the mouse genome identifies novel tissue-specific DNA methylation patterns of genes involved in neurodevelopment. Hing B; Ramos E; Braun P; McKane M; Jancic D; Tamashiro KL; Lee RS; Michaelson JJ; Druley TE; Potash JB Epigenetics; 2015; 10(7):581-96. PubMed ID: 25985232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detection of differentially methylated regions in whole genome bisulfite sequencing data using local Getis-Ord statistics. Wen Y; Chen F; Zhang Q; Zhuang Y; Li Z Bioinformatics; 2016 Nov; 32(22):3396-3404. PubMed ID: 27493194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Detection of differentially methylated regions from bisulfite-seq data by hidden Markov models incorporating genome-wide methylation level distributions. Saito Y; Mituyama T BMC Genomics; 2015; 16 Suppl 12(Suppl 12):S3. PubMed ID: 26681544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Methods for identifying differentially methylated regions for sequence- and array-based data. Chen DP; Lin YC; Fann CS Brief Funct Genomics; 2016 Nov; 15(6):485-490. PubMed ID: 27323952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. seqlm: an MDL based method for identifying differentially methylated regions in high density methylation array data. Kolde R; Märtens K; Lokk K; Laur S; Vilo J Bioinformatics; 2016 Sep; 32(17):2604-10. PubMed ID: 27187204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]