These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25973549)

  • 21. Sums of Spike Waveform Features for Motor Decoding.
    Li J; Li Z
    Front Neurosci; 2017; 11():406. PubMed ID: 28769745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Accurate spike sorting for multi-unit recordings.
    Takekawa T; Isomura Y; Fukai T
    Eur J Neurosci; 2010 Jan; 31(2):263-72. PubMed ID: 20074217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Optimizing for generalization in the decoding of internally generated activity in the hippocampus.
    van der Meer MAA; Carey AA; Tanaka Y
    Hippocampus; 2017 May; 27(5):580-595. PubMed ID: 28177571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Automatic online spike sorting with singular value decomposition and fuzzy C-mean clustering.
    Oliynyk A; Bonifazzi C; Montani F; Fadiga L
    BMC Neurosci; 2012 Aug; 13():96. PubMed ID: 22871125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Nonlinear point-process estimation of neural spiking activity based on variational Bayesian inference.
    Xiao P; Liu X
    J Neural Eng; 2022 Sep; 19(4):. PubMed ID: 35947962
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Construction of point process adaptive filter algorithms for neural systems using sequential Monte Carlo methods.
    Ergün A; Barbieri R; Eden UT; Wilson MA; Brown EN
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Mar; 54(3):419-28. PubMed ID: 17355053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Contrasting patterns of receptive field plasticity in the hippocampus and the entorhinal cortex: an adaptive filtering approach.
    Frank LM; Eden UT; Solo V; Wilson MA; Brown EN
    J Neurosci; 2002 May; 22(9):3817-30. PubMed ID: 11978857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A computationally efficient method for incorporating spike waveform information into decoding algorithms.
    Ventura V; Todorova S
    Neural Comput; 2015 May; 27(5):1033-50. PubMed ID: 25774541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Sequential Monte Carlo point-process estimation of kinematics from neural spiking activity for brain-machine interfaces.
    Wang Y; Paiva AR; Príncipe JC; Sanchez JC
    Neural Comput; 2009 Oct; 21(10):2894-930. PubMed ID: 19548797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Spike detection and spike sorting with a hidden Markov model improves offline decoding of motor cortical recordings.
    Li J; Chen X; Li Z
    J Neural Eng; 2019 Feb; 16(1):016014. PubMed ID: 30523823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. System identification of point-process neural systems using probability based Volterra kernels.
    Sandler RA; Deadwyler SA; Hampson RE; Song D; Berger TW; Marmarelis VZ
    J Neurosci Methods; 2015 Jan; 240():179-92. PubMed ID: 25479231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Accurate Estimation of Neural Population Dynamics without Spike Sorting.
    Trautmann EM; Stavisky SD; Lahiri S; Ames KC; Kaufman MT; O'Shea DJ; Vyas S; Sun X; Ryu SI; Ganguli S; Shenoy KV
    Neuron; 2019 Jul; 103(2):292-308.e4. PubMed ID: 31171448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An unsupervised automatic method for sorting neuronal spike waveforms in awake and freely moving animals.
    Aksenova TI; Chibirova OK; Dryga OA; Tetko IV; Benabid AL; Villa AE
    Methods; 2003 Jun; 30(2):178-87. PubMed ID: 12725785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A unified framework and method for automatic neural spike identification.
    Ekanadham C; Tranchina D; Simoncelli EP
    J Neurosci Methods; 2014 Jan; 222():47-55. PubMed ID: 24184059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Coherent Coding of Spatial Position Mediated by Theta Oscillations in the Hippocampus and Prefrontal Cortex.
    Zielinski MC; Shin JD; Jadhav SP
    J Neurosci; 2019 Jun; 39(23):4550-4565. PubMed ID: 30940717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Decoding Spike Trains from Neurons with Spatio-Temporal Receptive Fields.
    Sadras N; Shanechi MM
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2018 Jul; 2018():2012-2015. PubMed ID: 30440795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A common goodness-of-fit framework for neural population models using marked point process time-rescaling.
    Tao L; Weber KE; Arai K; Eden UT
    J Comput Neurosci; 2018 Oct; 45(2):147-162. PubMed ID: 30298220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. MEArec: A Fast and Customizable Testbench Simulator for Ground-truth Extracellular Spiking Activity.
    Buccino AP; Einevoll GT
    Neuroinformatics; 2021 Jan; 19(1):185-204. PubMed ID: 32648042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A point-process matched filter for event detection and decoding from population spike trains.
    Sadras N; Pesaran B; Shanechi MM
    J Neural Eng; 2019 Oct; 16(6):066016. PubMed ID: 31437831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Decoding visual information from a population of retinal ganglion cells.
    Warland DK; Reinagel P; Meister M
    J Neurophysiol; 1997 Nov; 78(5):2336-50. PubMed ID: 9356386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.