These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25973946)

  • 1. Revisiting GMOs: Are There Differences in European Consumers' Acceptance and Valuation for Cisgenically vs Transgenically Bred Rice?
    Delwaide AC; Nalley LL; Dixon BL; Danforth DM; Nayga RM; Van Loo EJ; Verbeke W
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0126060. PubMed ID: 25973946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Are all GMOs the same? Consumer acceptance of cisgenic rice in India.
    Shew AM; Nalley LL; Danforth DM; Dixon BL; Nayga RM; Delwaide AC; Valent B
    Plant Biotechnol J; 2016 Jan; 14(1):4-7. PubMed ID: 26242818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceived subjective versus objective knowledge: Consumer valuation of genetically modified certification on food producing plants.
    Rihn A; Khachatryan H; Wei X
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(8):e0255406. PubMed ID: 34411110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. New biotechnology enhances the application of cisgenesis in plant breeding.
    Hou H; Atlihan N; Lu ZX
    Front Plant Sci; 2014; 5():389. PubMed ID: 25157261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Acceptability of GM foods among Pakistani consumers.
    Ali A; Rahut DB; Imtiaz M
    GM Crops Food; 2016 Apr; 7(2):117-24. PubMed ID: 27494790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Rice from Remediated Soil: Potential from the Public in Sustainable Soil Pollution Treatment.
    Wang HH; Yang J; Hao N
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jul; 19(15):. PubMed ID: 35897316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Consumer willingness to pay for plant-based foods produced using microbial applications to replace synthetic chemical inputs.
    Ali BM; Ang F; van der Fels-Klerx HJ
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0260488. PubMed ID: 34874958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cisgenics - a sustainable approach for crop improvement.
    Telem RS; Wani SH; Singh NB; Nandini R; Sadhukhan R; Bhattacharya S; Mandal N
    Curr Genomics; 2013 Nov; 14(7):468-76. PubMed ID: 24396278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cisgenesis strongly improves introgression breeding and induced translocation breeding of plants.
    Jacobsen E; Schouten HJ
    Trends Biotechnol; 2007 May; 25(5):219-23. PubMed ID: 17383037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of information on young consumers' willingness to pay for genetically modified food: experimental auction analysis.
    Kajale DB; Becker TC
    Ecol Food Nutr; 2014; 53(3):292-311. PubMed ID: 24735210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Surveys suck: Consumer preferences when purchasing genetically engineered foods.
    Powell DA
    GM Crops Food; 2013; 4(3):195-201. PubMed ID: 24281042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Consumers' willingness to pay for nutritional claims fighting the obesity epidemic: the case of reduced-fat and low salt cheese in Spain.
    de-Magistris T; Lopéz-Galán B
    Public Health; 2016 Jun; 135():83-90. PubMed ID: 26996310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Consumers' Preferences and Willingness to Pay for Fish Products with Health and Environmental Labels: Evidence from Five European Countries.
    Menozzi D; Nguyen TT; Sogari G; Taskov D; Lucas S; Castro-Rial JLS; Mora C
    Nutrients; 2020 Aug; 12(9):. PubMed ID: 32878105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cisgenics and intragenics: boon or bane for crop improvement.
    Vasudevan SN; Pooja SK; Raju TJ; Damini CS
    Front Plant Sci; 2023; 14():1275145. PubMed ID: 38089798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Chinese consumers' valuation for prepared plant-based meat products: Does environmental information matter?
    Jiang X; Chen X; Wu L
    J Food Sci; 2024 Sep; 89(9):5823-5840. PubMed ID: 39098815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detection and occurrence of genetically modified rice and potato in the Saudi food market.
    Aladadh MA; Ebrahim HNEAE; Elsanhoty RM; Ramadan MF
    Braz J Biol; 2024; 84():e285978. PubMed ID: 39292141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Information and order of information effects on consumers' acceptance and valuation for genetically modified edamame soybean.
    Lee JY; Popp MP; Wolfe EJ; Nayga RM; Popp JS; Chen P; Seo HS
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0206300. PubMed ID: 30356270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Willingness-to-accept and purchase genetically modified rice with high folate content in Shanxi Province, China.
    De Steur H; Gellynck X; Storozhenko S; Liqun G; Lambert W; Van Der Straeten D; Viaene J
    Appetite; 2010 Feb; 54(1):118-25. PubMed ID: 19815041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. EFSA's scientific activities and achievements on the risk assessment of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) during its first decade of existence: looking back and ahead.
    Devos Y; Aguilera J; Diveki Z; Gomes A; Liu Y; Paoletti C; du Jardin P; Herman L; Perry JN; Waigmann E
    Transgenic Res; 2014 Feb; 23(1):1-25. PubMed ID: 23963741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intragenesis and cisgenesis as alternatives to transgenic crop development.
    Holme IB; Wendt T; Holm PB
    Plant Biotechnol J; 2013 May; 11(4):395-407. PubMed ID: 23421562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.