180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25975126)
1. Supreme Court ruling may determine the future of state-based professionai licensing.
Owsiany DJ
J Am Coll Dent; 2014; 81(4):51-5. PubMed ID: 25975126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Closer Look at the North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners and Who Can Practice Dentistry.
Parker MA
J Am Coll Dent; 2015; 82(3):12-7. PubMed ID: 26697649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Teeth-Whitening Debacle.
Plunkett L
N Y State Dent J; 2015; 81(4):4-7. PubMed ID: 26373026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A License to Labor.
Weiss S
State Legis; 2017 Jan; 43(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 28117565
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. State Dental Boards Are Not Immune from Antitrust Liability.
Schulte DJ
J Mich Dent Assoc; 2015 Apr; 97(4):22, 73. PubMed ID: 26268002
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. How Will the U.S. Supreme Court's Decision in North Carolina Dental Affect the Regulation of the Professions?
LeBuhn R
J Am Coll Dent; 2015; 82(3):18-20. PubMed ID: 26697650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. FTC rules against North Carolina on teeth whitening.
Schulte D
J Mich Dent Assoc; 2012 Feb; 94(2):18. PubMed ID: 22720494
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Supreme Court Weighs in on Dental Ethics.
Chambers DW
J Calif Dent Assoc; 2015 May; 43(5):231. PubMed ID: 26798889
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. What Contract? With Whom? For What Purpose?
DeFriese GH
J Am Coll Dent; 2015; 82(3):21-4. PubMed ID: 26697651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The FTC's case against the North Carolina Dental Board should not impact the Michigan Board of Medicine.
Schulte DJ
Mich Med; 2012; 111(6):4. PubMed ID: 23362681
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Who Gets to Whiten Teeth?
Hanley KJ
N Y State Dent J; 2016 Apr; 82(3):2-4. PubMed ID: 27348941
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Battle not over: FTC wants Supreme Court to review Palmyra case.
Carlson J
Mod Healthc; 2012 Mar; 42(10):8-9. PubMed ID: 22458067
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. An FDA Legal Grab Bag: Severe Weather, a U.S. Supreme Court Slip Opinion, Working Interviews, Board of Pharmacy Fines and Patient Abandonment.
Nicol G
Todays FDA; 2015; 27(3):6-7, 9. PubMed ID: 26523306
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Words can bite back.
Lamacki W
CDS Rev; 2015; 108(3):44. PubMed ID: 26058302
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Ruling jeopardizes authority of state medical boards.
S D Med; 2013 Jul; 66(7):293. PubMed ID: 23957119
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The Texas State Board of Dental Examiners--regulating the profession.
Stuart ML
Tex Dent J; 2013 Oct; 130(10):1000-2. PubMed ID: 24354157
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Spurned in Texas. Supreme court rejects group's price-fix challenge.
Blesch G
Mod Healthc; 2009 Mar; 39(9):14. PubMed ID: 19291851
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The Texas State Board of Dental Examiners - Sunset Review in Texas.
Duncan DA
Tex Dent J; 2015 Oct; 132(10):832-5. PubMed ID: 26710591
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. COPAing with antitrust rules. Just three systems have used certificates of public advantage seeking antitrust immunity. Experts now say they're regulatory dinosaurs.
Taylor M
Mod Healthc; 2005 Feb; 35(8):30-2, 34. PubMed ID: 15765844
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. High court wary about dental board's antitrust exemption.
Schencker L
Mod Healthc; 2014 Oct; 44(42):17. PubMed ID: 25509606
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
