These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25975175)

  • 1. Visual inference of arm movement is constrained by motor representations.
    Saunier G; Paillard AC; Vargas CD; Pozzo T
    Behav Brain Res; 2015 Sep; 290():197-200. PubMed ID: 25975175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interplay of Gravicentric, Egocentric, and Visual Cues About the Vertical in the Control of Arm Movement Direction.
    Bock O; Bury N
    Perception; 2018 Mar; 47(3):296-305. PubMed ID: 29235935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Temporal and spatial occlusion of advanced visual information constrains movement (re)organization in one-handed catching behaviors.
    Stone JA; Maynard IW; North JS; Panchuk D; Davids K
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Mar; 174():80-88. PubMed ID: 28196753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dissociation between "where" and "how" judgements of one's own motor performance in a video-controlled reaching task.
    Boy F; Palluel-Germain R; Orliaguet JP; Coello Y
    Neurosci Lett; 2005 Sep; 386(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 15982810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intercepting a moving target: effects of temporal precision constraints and movement amplitude.
    Tresilian JR; Lonergan A
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 Jan; 142(2):193-207. PubMed ID: 11807574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spatial perspective taking mediated by whole-body motor simulation.
    Muto H; Matsushita S; Morikawa K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Mar; 44(3):337-355. PubMed ID: 28795837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reflexive limb selection and control of reach direction to moving targets in cats, monkeys, and humans.
    Perfiliev S; Isa T; Johnels B; Steg G; Wessberg J
    J Neurophysiol; 2010 Nov; 104(5):2423-32. PubMed ID: 20810693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Updating visual memory across eye movements for ocular and arm motor control.
    Thompson AA; Henriques DY
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Nov; 100(5):2507-14. PubMed ID: 18768640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Perception and regulation of human movement: Plea for a physical biology].
    Bardy BG
    J Soc Biol; 2006; 200(2):135-43. PubMed ID: 17151550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of motion coherence manipulations on the synchronization level of a perception-action task.
    Ceux T; Wagemans J; Rosas P; Montagne G; Buekers M
    Behav Brain Res; 2005 Jul; 162(1):83-9. PubMed ID: 15922068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Done in 100 ms: path-dependent visuomotor transformation in the human upper limb.
    Gu C; Pruszynski JA; Gribble PL; Corneil BD
    J Neurophysiol; 2018 Apr; 119(4):1319-1328. PubMed ID: 29212925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Head, eye and arm coordination in table tennis.
    Rodrigues ST; Vickers JN; Williams AM
    J Sports Sci; 2002 Mar; 20(3):187-200. PubMed ID: 11999475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Top-down attentional processes modulate the coding of atypical biological motion kinematics in the absence of motor signals.
    Hayes SJ; Roberts JW; Elliott D; Bennett SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Aug; 40(4):1641-53. PubMed ID: 24955699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Illusions in action: consequences of inconsistent processing of spatial attributes.
    Smeets JB; Brenner E; de Grave DD; Cuijpers RH
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 Nov; 147(2):135-44. PubMed ID: 12410328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Motor contagion: the contribution of trajectory and end-points.
    Roberts JW; Hayes SJ; Uji M; Bennett SJ
    Psychol Res; 2015 Jul; 79(4):621-9. PubMed ID: 24947759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Atypical biological kinematics are represented during observational practice.
    Foster NC; Bennett SJ; Causer J; Bird G; Andrew M; Hayes SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jun; 44(6):842-847. PubMed ID: 29809051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reaching decisions during ongoing movements.
    Michalski J; Green AM; Cisek P
    J Neurophysiol; 2020 Mar; 123(3):1090-1102. PubMed ID: 32049585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lesions to the motor system affect action perception.
    Serino A; De Filippo L; Casavecchia C; Coccia M; Shiffrar M; Làdavas E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Mar; 22(3):413-26. PubMed ID: 19302003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spatial biases in motion extrapolation for manual interception.
    Reid SA; Dessing JC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jan; 44(1):38-52. PubMed ID: 28447848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of task constraints on the organization of interception movements.
    Fayt V; Bootsma RJ; Marteniuk RG; Mackenzie CL; Laurent M
    J Sports Sci; 1997 Dec; 15(6):581-6. PubMed ID: 9486435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.