These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25975208)

  • 1. Assessing the quality of published genetic association studies in meta-analyses: the quality of genetic studies (Q-Genie) tool.
    Sohani ZN; Meyre D; de Souza RJ; Joseph PG; Gandhi M; Dennis BB; Norman G; Anand SS
    BMC Genet; 2015 May; 16():50. PubMed ID: 25975208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Empirical evaluation of the Q-Genie tool: a protocol for assessment of effectiveness.
    Sohani ZN; Sarma S; Alyass A; de Souza RJ; Robiou-du-Pont S; Li A; Mayhew A; Yazdi F; Reddon H; Lamri A; Stryjecki C; Ishola A; Lee YK; Vashi N; Anand SS; Meyre D
    BMJ Open; 2016 Jun; 6(6):e010403. PubMed ID: 27288371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Methodological quality of Meta-analyses regarding studies related to genetic association on papers published in Chinese journals].
    Li S; Fang K; Sun AY; Sun KX; Hu YH
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Sep; 34(9):917-21. PubMed ID: 24331971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: an independent appraisal.
    Delaney A; Bagshaw SM; Ferland A; Laupland K; Manns B; Doig C
    Crit Care Med; 2007 Feb; 35(2):589-94. PubMed ID: 17205029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The quality of meta-analyses of genetic association studies: a review with recommendations.
    Minelli C; Thompson JR; Abrams KR; Thakkinstian A; Attia J
    Am J Epidemiol; 2009 Dec; 170(11):1333-43. PubMed ID: 19901000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Methodological quality of systematic reviews in subfertility: a comparison of Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews in assisted reproductive technologies.
    Windsor B; Popovich I; Jordan V; Showell M; Shea B; Farquhar C
    Hum Reprod; 2012 Dec; 27(12):3460-6. PubMed ID: 23034152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews on tuberculosis.
    Nicolau I; Ling D; Tian L; Lienhardt C; Pai M
    Int J Tuberc Lung Dis; 2013 Sep; 17(9):1160-9. PubMed ID: 23809432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A methodological review of recent meta-analyses has found significant heterogeneity in age between randomized groups.
    Clark L; Fairhurst C; Hewitt CE; Birks Y; Brabyn S; Cockayne S; Rodgers S; Hicks K; Hodgson R; Littlewood E; Torgerson DJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Sep; 67(9):1016-24. PubMed ID: 24909873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Single-center trials show larger treatment effects than multicenter trials: evidence from a meta-epidemiologic study.
    Dechartres A; Boutron I; Trinquart L; Charles P; Ravaud P
    Ann Intern Med; 2011 Jul; 155(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 21727292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does updating improve the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews?
    Shea B; Boers M; Grimshaw JM; Hamel C; Bouter LM
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Jun; 6():27. PubMed ID: 16772030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
    Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. PreMeta: a tool to facilitate meta-analysis of rare-variant associations.
    Tang ZZ; Bunn P; Tao R; Liu Z; Lin DY
    BMC Genomics; 2017 Feb; 18(1):160. PubMed ID: 28196472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Methodological quality of systematic reviews on influenza vaccination.
    Remschmidt C; Wichmann O; Harder T
    Vaccine; 2014 Mar; 32(15):1678-84. PubMed ID: 24513008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Errors in the conduct of systematic reviews of pharmacological interventions for irritable bowel syndrome.
    Ford AC; Guyatt GH; Talley NJ; Moayyedi P
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2010 Feb; 105(2):280-8. PubMed ID: 19920807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Empirical evaluation showed that the Copas selection model provided a useful summary in 80% of meta-analyses.
    Carpenter JR; Schwarzer G; Rücker G; Künstler R
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jun; 62(6):624-631.e4. PubMed ID: 19282148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality of conduct and reporting of meta-analyses of surgical interventions.
    Adie S; Ma D; Harris IA; Naylor JM; Craig JC
    Ann Surg; 2015 Apr; 261(4):685-94. PubMed ID: 25575252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [A standardization study of Meta-analyses on nephropathy published in Chinese journals].
    Liu JY; Zhao YL; Zhou QH; Wu YM; Zhou SG; Zhang L; Fu P
    Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Oct; 52(10):833-7. PubMed ID: 24378060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of incidence and prevalence studies in neuroepidemiology.
    Fiest KM; Pringsheim T; Patten SB; Svenson LW; Jetté N
    Neuroepidemiology; 2014; 42(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 24356060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A systematic evaluation of the quality of meta-analyses in endodontics.
    Suebnukarn S; Ngamboonsirisingh S; Rattanabanlang A
    J Endod; 2010 Apr; 36(4):602-8. PubMed ID: 20307731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.