348 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25975360)
1. Robust relationship between reading span and speech recognition in noise.
Souza P; Arehart K
Int J Audiol; 2015; 54(10):705-13. PubMed ID: 25975360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stimulus and listener factors affecting age-related changes in competing speech perception.
Helfer KS; Freyman RL
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):748-59. PubMed ID: 25096109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dynamic relation between working memory capacity and speech recognition in noise during the first 6 months of hearing aid use.
Ng EH; Classon E; Larsby B; Arlinger S; Lunner T; Rudner M; Rönnberg J
Trends Hear; 2014 Nov; 18():. PubMed ID: 25421088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of hearing aid algorithms using a master hearing aid: the influence of hearing aid experience on the relationship between speech recognition and cognitive capacity.
Rählmann S; Meis M; Schulte M; Kießling J; Walger M; Meister H
Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S105-S111. PubMed ID: 28449597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Danish reading span data from 283 hearing-aid users, including a sub-group analysis of their relationship to speech-in-noise performance.
Borch Petersen E; Lunner T; Vestergaard MD; Sundewall Thorén E
Int J Audiol; 2016; 55(4):254-61. PubMed ID: 26836955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of age and hearing loss on recognition of unaccented and accented multisyllabic words.
Gordon-Salant S; Yeni-Komshian GH; Fitzgibbons PJ; Cohen JI
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):884-97. PubMed ID: 25698021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Masked speech perception across the adult lifespan: Impact of age and hearing impairment.
Goossens T; Vercammen C; Wouters J; van Wieringen A
Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():109-124. PubMed ID: 27845259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. How linguistic closure and verbal working memory relate to speech recognition in noise--a review.
Besser J; Koelewijn T; Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
Trends Amplif; 2013 Jun; 17(2):75-93. PubMed ID: 23945955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of Age and Working Memory Capacity on Speech Recognition Performance in Noise Among Listeners With Normal Hearing.
Gordon-Salant S; Cole SS
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):593-602. PubMed ID: 27232071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of noise and working memory capacity on memory processing of speech for hearing-aid users.
Ng EH; Rudner M; Lunner T; Pedersen MS; Rönnberg J
Int J Audiol; 2013 Jul; 52(7):433-41. PubMed ID: 23550584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hearing impairment, cognition and speech understanding: exploratory factor analyses of a comprehensive test battery for a group of hearing aid users, the n200 study.
Rönnberg J; Lunner T; Ng EH; Lidestam B; Zekveld AA; Sörqvist P; Lyxell B; Träff U; Yumba W; Classon E; Hällgren M; Larsby B; Signoret C; Pichora-Fuller MK; Rudner M; Danielsson H; Stenfelt S
Int J Audiol; 2016 Nov; 55(11):623-42. PubMed ID: 27589015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the NAL Dynamic Conversations Test in older listeners with hearing loss.
Best V; Keidser G; Freeston K; Buchholz JM
Int J Audiol; 2018 Mar; 57(3):221-229. PubMed ID: 28826285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Speech reception with different bilateral directional processing schemes: Influence of binaural hearing, audiometric asymmetry, and acoustic scenario.
Neher T; Wagener KC; Latzel M
Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():36-48. PubMed ID: 28783570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of stimulus-related factors and hearing impairment on listening effort as indicated by pupil dilation.
Ohlenforst B; Zekveld AA; Lunner T; Wendt D; Naylor G; Wang Y; Versfeld NJ; Kramer SE
Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():68-79. PubMed ID: 28622894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A physiologically-inspired model reproducing the speech intelligibility benefit in cochlear implant listeners with residual acoustic hearing.
Zamaninezhad L; Hohmann V; Büchner A; Schädler MR; Jürgens T
Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():50-61. PubMed ID: 27838372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A method for measuring the intelligibility of uninterrupted, continuous speech.
MacPherson A; Akeroyd MA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1027-30. PubMed ID: 24606245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Individual differences in language and working memory affect children's speech recognition in noise.
McCreery RW; Spratford M; Kirby B; Brennan M
Int J Audiol; 2017 May; 56(5):306-315. PubMed ID: 27981855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Just-Meaningful Difference in Speech-to-Noise Ratio.
McShefferty D; Whitmer WM; Akeroyd MA
Trends Hear; 2016 Feb; 20():. PubMed ID: 26834121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The relative importance of consonant and vowel segments to the recognition of words and sentences: effects of age and hearing loss.
Fogerty D; Kewley-Port D; Humes LE
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1667-78. PubMed ID: 22978895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
