These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25976146)

  • 41. THE FUTURE OF TECHNOLOGY AND ROBOTICS IN SURGERY.
    Domínguez-Rosado I; Mercado MA
    Rev Invest Clin; 2021; 73(5):326-328. PubMed ID: 34609361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Introduction of Novel Medical Devices in Surgery: Ethical Challenges of Current Oversight and Regulation.
    Muskens IS; Gupta S; Hulsbergen A; Moojen WA; Broekman MLD
    J Am Coll Surg; 2017 Oct; 225(4):558-565. PubMed ID: 28826802
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Comparison of Attending and Resident Surgeons' Opinions of Robotic Surgery Training in General Surgery Residency.
    Nolan HR; Christie DB; Ashley DW
    Am Surg; 2015 Aug; 81(8):303-5. PubMed ID: 26215228
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Introducing new technology safely into urological practice.
    Van Bruwaene S; Namdarian B; Challacombe B; Eddy B; Billiet I
    World J Urol; 2018 Apr; 36(4):543-548. PubMed ID: 29327248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The perils of commercially driven surgical innovation.
    Wall LL; Brown D
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jan; 202(1):30.e1-4. PubMed ID: 19608150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Current status of robotic simulators in acquisition of robotic surgical skills.
    Kumar A; Smith R; Patel VR
    Curr Opin Urol; 2015 Mar; 25(2):168-74. PubMed ID: 25574791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Ethical issues in surgical research.
    Miller FG
    Thorac Surg Clin; 2005 Nov; 15(4):543-54. PubMed ID: 16276819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. ROBOTIC SURGERY: BIOETHICAL ASPECTS.
    Siqueira-Batista R; Souza CR; Maia PM; Siqueira SL
    Arq Bras Cir Dig; 2016; 29(4):287-290. PubMed ID: 28076489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The ethics of applying new medical technologies.
    Iserson KV; Chiasson PM
    Semin Laparosc Surg; 2002 Dec; 9(4):222-9. PubMed ID: 12522781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Robotic natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (R-NOTES): literature review and prototype system.
    Azizi Koutenaei B; Wilson E; Monfaredi R; Peters C; Kronreif G; Cleary K
    Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2015 Feb; 24(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 25539996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Training, credentialing, proctoring and medicolegal risks of robotic urological surgery: recommendations of the society of urologic robotic surgeons.
    Zorn KC; Gautam G; Shalhav AL; Clayman RV; Ahlering TE; Albala DM; Lee DI; Sundaram CP; Matin SF; Castle EP; Winfield HN; Gettman MT; Lee BR; Thomas R; Patel VR; Leveillee RJ; Wong C; Badlani GH; Rha KH; Eggener SE; Wiklund P; Mottrie A; Atug F; Kural AR; Joseph JV;
    J Urol; 2009 Sep; 182(3):1126-32. PubMed ID: 19625032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Robotic technology in surgery: current status in 2008.
    Murphy DG; Hall R; Tong R; Goel R; Costello AJ
    ANZ J Surg; 2008 Dec; 78(12):1076-81. PubMed ID: 19087046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. "Reality surgery"--a research ethics perspective on the live broadcast of surgical procedures.
    Williams JB; Mathews R; D'Amico TA
    J Surg Educ; 2011; 68(1):58-61. PubMed ID: 21292217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. An anthropomorphic design for a minimally invasive surgical system based on a survey of surgical technologies, techniques and training.
    Tzemanaki A; Walters P; Pipe AG; Melhuish C; Dogramadzi S
    Int J Med Robot; 2014 Sep; 10(3):368-78. PubMed ID: 24127331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Robotics and systems technology for advanced endoscopic procedures: experiences in general surgery.
    Schurr MO; Arezzo A; Buess GF
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1999 Nov; 16 Suppl 2():S97-105. PubMed ID: 10613568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Pediatric robotic surgery: early assessment.
    van Haasteren G; Levine S; Hayes W
    Pediatrics; 2009 Dec; 124(6):1642-9. PubMed ID: 19917586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Geoengineering as Collective Experimentation.
    Stilgoe J
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2016 Jun; 22(3):851-69. PubMed ID: 25862639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Augmented-reality-based skills training for robot-assisted urethrovesical anastomosis: a multi-institutional randomised controlled trial.
    Chowriappa A; Raza SJ; Fazili A; Field E; Malito C; Samarasekera D; Shi Y; Ahmed K; Wilding G; Kaouk J; Eun DD; Ghazi A; Peabody JO; Kesavadas T; Mohler JL; Guru KA
    BJU Int; 2015 Feb; 115(2):336-45. PubMed ID: 24612471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [Standardization and modeling of surgical processes].
    Strauss G; Schmitz P
    Chirurg; 2016 Dec; 87(12):1008-1014. PubMed ID: 27812812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Surgical innovation and the introduction of new technologies.
    Sodergren MH; Darzi A
    Br J Surg; 2013 Jun; 100 Suppl 6():S12-3. PubMed ID: 23804045
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.