These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25976299)

  • 1. Onset of background dynamic noise attenuates preview benefit in inefficient visual search.
    Osugi T; Murakami I
    Vision Res; 2015 Jul; 112():33-44. PubMed ID: 25976299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Previewing distractors reduces efficiency of visual processing at previewed locations.
    Osugi T; Murakami I
    Vision Res; 2014 Feb; 95():51-60. PubMed ID: 24368220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Selection of new objects by onset capture and visual marking.
    Osugi T; Hayashi D; Murakami I
    Vision Res; 2016 May; 122():21-33. PubMed ID: 27001341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The spatial distribution of inhibition in preview search.
    Osugi T; Kumada T; Kawahara J
    Vision Res; 2009 Mar; 49(8):851-61. PubMed ID: 19275913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Drastic Change in Background Luminance or Motion Degrades the Preview Benefit.
    Osugi T; Murakami I
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1252. PubMed ID: 28790949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Preview benefit survives a three-dimensional rotation of the rigid configuration of search items.
    Osugi T; Murakami I
    Vision Res; 2019 Mar; 156():56-65. PubMed ID: 30682404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An onset advantage without a preview benefit: neuropsychological evidence separating onset and preview effects in search.
    Humphreys GW; Olivers CN; Yoon EY
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Jan; 18(1):110-20. PubMed ID: 16417687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visual search in temporally segregated displays: converging operations in the study of the preview benefit.
    Belopolsky AV; Peterson MS; Kramer AF
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):453-66. PubMed ID: 16099358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual marking for search: behavioral and event-related potential analyses.
    Jacobsen T; Humphreys GW; Schröger E; Roeber U
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2002 Nov; 14(3):410-21. PubMed ID: 12421664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Flexible feature-based inhibition in visual search mediates magnified impairments of selection: evidence from carry-over effects under dynamic preview-search conditions.
    Andrews LS; Watson DG; Humphreys GW; Braithwaite JJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Aug; 37(4):1007-16. PubMed ID: 21553995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A singleton distractor updates the inhibitory template for visual marking.
    Yamauchi K; Kawahara JI
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jan; 192():200-211. PubMed ID: 30530171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Blink and you won't miss it: the preview benefit in visual marking survives internally generated eyeblinks.
    von Mühlenen A; Watson D; Gunnell DO
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Oct; 39(5):1279-90. PubMed ID: 23398259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Out with the old: inhibition of old items in a preview search is limited.
    Emrich SM; Ruppel JD; Al-Aidroos N; Pratt J; Ferber S
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Nov; 70(8):1552-7. PubMed ID: 19064497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visuospatial working memory mediates inhibitory and facilitatory guidance in preview search.
    Barrett DJ; Shimozaki SS; Jensen S; Zobay O
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Oct; 42(10):1533-46. PubMed ID: 27195768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Temporal Binding and Segmentation in Visual Search: A Computational Neuroscience Analysis.
    Mavritsaki E; Humphreys G
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Oct; 28(10):1553-67. PubMed ID: 27243617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attentional set protects visual marking from visual transients.
    Osugi T; Kawahara JI
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(1):69-90. PubMed ID: 22834464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The preview benefit for familiar and unfamiliar faces.
    Persike M; Meinhardt-Injac B; Meinhardt G
    Vision Res; 2013 Jul; 87():1-9. PubMed ID: 23694681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The preview benefit in single-feature and conjunction search: Constraints of visual marking.
    Meinhardt G; Persike M
    J Vis; 2015; 15(13):13. PubMed ID: 26382004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visual marking: the effects of irrelevant changes on preview search.
    Watson DG; Humphreys GW
    Percept Psychophys; 2005 Apr; 67(3):418-34. PubMed ID: 16119391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visual marking and facial affect: can an emotional face be ignored?
    Blagrove E; Watson DG
    Emotion; 2010 Apr; 10(2):147-68. PubMed ID: 20364892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.