These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25976499)

  • 1. Non-contrast-enhanced MR angiography for detecting arteriovenous fistula dysfunction in haemodialysis patients.
    Jin WT; Zhang GF; Liu HC; Zhang H; Li B; Zhu XQ
    Clin Radiol; 2015 Aug; 70(8):852-7. PubMed ID: 25976499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stenosis detection in failing hemodialysis access fistulas and grafts: comparison of color Doppler ultrasonography, contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography, and digital subtraction angiography.
    Doelman C; Duijm LE; Liem YS; Froger CL; Tielbeek AV; Donkers-van Rossum AB; Cuypers PW; Douwes-Draaijer P; Buth J; van den Bosch HC
    J Vasc Surg; 2005 Oct; 42(4):739-46. PubMed ID: 16242563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced 3T MR and 64-row multidetector CT angiography for the localization of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas.
    Oda S; Utsunomiya D; Hirai T; Kai Y; Ohmori Y; Shigematsu Y; Iryo Y; Uetani H; Azuma M; Yamashita Y
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2014 Feb; 35(2):407-12. PubMed ID: 23907244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stenosis detection with MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography in dysfunctional hemodialysis access fistulas and grafts.
    Froger CL; Duijm LE; Liem YS; Tielbeek AV; Donkers-van Rossum AB; Douwes-Draaijer P; Cuypers PW; Buth J; van den Bosch HC
    Radiology; 2005 Jan; 234(1):284-91. PubMed ID: 15618386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stenosis detection in forearm hemodialysis arteriovenous fistulae by multiphase contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography: preliminary experience.
    Planken RN; Tordoir JH; Dammers R; de Haan MW; Oei TK; van der Sande FM; van Engelshoven JM; Leiner T
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2003 Jan; 17(1):54-64. PubMed ID: 12500274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. MR angiography at 3 Tesla to assess proximal internal carotid artery stenoses: contrast-enhanced or 3D time-of-flight MR angiography?
    Weber J; Veith P; Jung B; Ihorst G; Moske-Eick O; Meckel S; Urbach H; Taschner CA
    Clin Neuroradiol; 2015 Mar; 25(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 24384680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Non-enhanced MR angiography of renal arteries: comparison with contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
    Angeretti MG; Lumia D; Canì A; Barresi M; Nocchi Cardim L; Piacentino F; Maresca AM; Novario R; Genovese EA; Fugazzola C
    Acta Radiol; 2013 Sep; 54(7):749-56. PubMed ID: 23550187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of Transplant Renal Artery Stenosis with Non-contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography: Comparison with Digital Subtraction Angiography.
    Pan L; Shen L; Fan M; Xing Z; Ding J; Du Y; Guo S; Chen J; Xing W
    Acad Radiol; 2024 Jun; 31(6):2405-2411. PubMed ID: 38142177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Initial clinical evaluation of a non-contrast-enhanced MR angiography method in the distal lower extremities.
    Priest AN; Joubert I; Winterbottom AP; See TC; Graves MJ; Lomas DJ
    Magn Reson Med; 2013 Dec; 70(6):1644-52. PubMed ID: 23440691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Non-Contrast Enhanced MR Angiography (NCE-MRA) of the Calf: A Direct Comparison between Flow-Sensitive Dephasing (FSD) Prepared Steady-State Free Precession (SSFP) and Quiescent-Interval Single-Shot (QISS) in Patients with Diabetes.
    Zhang N; Zou L; Huang Y; Liu D; Tang Y; Fan Z; Chen H; Liu X
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0128786. PubMed ID: 26035645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Non-contrast-enhanced imaging of haemodialysis fistulas using quiescent-interval single-shot (QISS) MRA: a feasibility study.
    Okur A; Kantarci M; Karaca L; Yildiz S; Sade R; Pirimoglu B; Keles M; Avci A; Çankaya E; Schmitt P
    Clin Radiol; 2016 Mar; 71(3):244-9. PubMed ID: 26732890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diagnostic performance of a non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging protocol for potential living related kidney donors.
    Goetti R; Baumueller S; Alkadhi H; Clavien PA; Schiesser M; Pfammatter T; Hunziker R; Puippe G
    Acad Radiol; 2013 Apr; 20(4):393-400. PubMed ID: 23498978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of CT and MR angiography in evaluation of peripheral arterial disease before endovascular intervention.
    Cina A; Di Stasi C; Semeraro V; Marano R; Savino G; Iezzi R; Bonomo L
    Acta Radiol; 2016 May; 57(5):547-56. PubMed ID: 26185265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Non-contrast-enhanced 4D MR angiography with STAR spin labeling and variable flip angle sampling: a feasibility study for the assessment of Dural Arteriovenous Fistula.
    Jang J; Schmitt P; Kim BY; Choi HS; Jung SL; Ahn KJ; Kim I; Paek M; Kim BS
    Neuroradiology; 2014 Apr; 56(4):305-14. PubMed ID: 24526141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An international multicenter comparison of time-SLIP unenhanced MR angiography and contrast-enhanced CT angiography for assessing renal artery stenosis: the renal artery contrast-free trial.
    Albert TS; Akahane M; Parienty I; Yellin N; Catalá V; Alomar X; Prot A; Tomizawa N; Xue H; Katabathina VS; Lopera JE; Jin Z
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jan; 204(1):182-8. PubMed ID: 25539255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detection of infragenual arterial disease using non-contrast-enhanced MR angiography in patients with diabetes.
    Liu X; Zhang N; Fan Z; Feng F; Yang Q; Zheng H; Liu P; Li D
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Dec; 40(6):1422-9. PubMed ID: 24925770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. 3 T contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for evaluation of the intracranial arteries: comparison with time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography and multislice computed tomography angiography.
    Villablanca JP; Nael K; Habibi R; Nael A; Laub G; Finn JP
    Invest Radiol; 2006 Nov; 41(11):799-805. PubMed ID: 17035870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Supra-aortic low-dose contrast-enhanced time-resolved magnetic resonance (MR) angiography at 3 T: comparison with time-of-flight MR angiography and high-resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
    Lee YJ; Kim BS; Koo JS; Kim BY; Jang J; Choi HS; Jung SL; Ahn KJ
    Acta Radiol; 2015 Jun; 56(6):673-80. PubMed ID: 24951617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Feasibility of non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for imaging upper extremity vasculature prior to vascular access creation.
    Bode AS; Planken RN; Merkx MA; van der Sande FM; Geerts L; Tordoir JH; Leiner T
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2012 Jan; 43(1):88-94. PubMed ID: 22070856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of three-dimensional volume-targeted thin-slab FIESTA magnetic resonance angiography and 64-multidetector computed tomographic angiography for the identification of proximal coronary stenosis.
    Cheng L; Ma L; Schoenhagen P; Ye H; Lou X; Gao Y; Zhao X; Wang X; Dong W
    Int J Cardiol; 2013 Sep; 167(6):2969-76. PubMed ID: 22999342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.