219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25976689)
1. Proximal Segment Changes After Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy in Facial Asymmetry Patients.
Kim JW; Son WS; Kim SS; Kim YI
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Aug; 73(8):1592-605. PubMed ID: 25976689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Short- and long-term changes of condylar position after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular advancement in combination with Le Fort I osteotomy evaluated by cone-beam computed tomography.
Chen S; Lei J; Wang X; Fu KY; Farzad P; Yi B
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Nov; 71(11):1956-66. PubMed ID: 23973047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Skeletal stability and condylar position related to fixation method following mandibular setback with bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Roh YC; Shin SH; Kim SS; Sandor GK; Kim YD
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1958-63. PubMed ID: 25441865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation on the condylar displacement following sagittal split ramus osteotomy in asymmetric setback patients: Comparison between conventional approach and surgery-first approach.
Oh MH; Hwang HS; Lee KM; Cho JH
Angle Orthod; 2017 Sep; 87(5):733-738. PubMed ID: 28530843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Changes in condylar position after BSSRO with and without Le Fort I osteotomy via surgery-first approach in mandibular prognathism with facial asymmetry.
Li J; Ryu SY; Park HJ; Kook MS; Jung S; Han JJ; Oh HK
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2017 Jun; 123(6):661-669. PubMed ID: 28392230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Changes in Condylar Position Within 12 Months After Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy With and Without Le Fort I Osteotomy by Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.
Han Y
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Jan; 80(1):162-173. PubMed ID: 34547267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Changes in temporomandibular joint and ramus after sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular prognathism patients with and without asymmetry.
Ueki K; Moroi A; Sotobori M; Ishihara Y; Marukawa K; Yoshizawa K; Kato K; Kawashiri S
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):821-7. PubMed ID: 22507292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of condylar morphology changes and position stability following unilateral and bilateral sagittal split mandibular ramus osteotomy in patients with mandibular prognathism.
Lin H; He Y; Feng Y; Huang F
Head Face Med; 2019 Jul; 15(1):18. PubMed ID: 31296246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Condylar positional changes up to 12 months after bimaxillary surgery for skeletal class III malocclusions.
Kim YJ; Lee Y; Chun YS; Kang N; Kim SJ; Kim M
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Jan; 72(1):145-56. PubMed ID: 24071374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Three-Dimensional Changes in the Mandibular Proximal Segment After Using a Surgery-First Approach in Patients With Class III Malocclusion and Facial Asymmetry.
Kim M; Jha N; Choi JH; Kim YJ; Lee U; Cevidanes L; Choi JY; Baek SH
J Craniofac Surg; 2022 Oct; 33(7):1956-1961. PubMed ID: 35175981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Horizontal changes in the condylar head after sagittal split ramus osteotomy with bent plate fixation.
Ueki K; Degerliyurt K; Hashiba Y; Marukawa K; Nakagawa K; Yamamoto E
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Nov; 106(5):656-61. PubMed ID: 18602292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of postoperative stability after BSSRO to correct facial asymmetry depending on the amount of bone contact between the proximal and distal segment.
Yang HJ; Hwang SJ
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):e165-70. PubMed ID: 24011465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Change in condylar position in posterior bending osteotomy minimizing condylar torque in BSSRO for facial asymmetry.
Yang HJ; Hwang SJ
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jun; 42(4):325-32. PubMed ID: 23816144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Three-dimensional changes in condylar position in skeletal class Ⅲ patients with mandibular deviation after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy].
Huang JQ; Huang Z; Wu J; Wang YJ; Sang T; Liu F; Zheng Y
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Oct; 54(10):649-655. PubMed ID: 31606999
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The Evaluation of Condylar Position Change in the Asymmetric Mandible Following Sagittal Split Osteotomy.
Tabrizi R; Amini E; Hormozi B; Behnia P; Aboul Hosn Centenero S
J Craniofac Surg; 2024 Jun; 35(4):e367-e371. PubMed ID: 38578104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A CBCT study on positional change in mandibular condyle according to metallic anchorage methods in skeletal class III patients after orthognatic surgery.
Choi BJ; Choi YH; Lee BS; Kwon YD; Choo YJ; Ohe JY
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1617-22. PubMed ID: 24962042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Transverse stability of the proximal segment after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular setback surgery.
Yoo JY; Kwon YD; Suh JH; Ko SJ; Lee B; Lee JW; Kim EC; Girod S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Aug; 42(8):994-1000. PubMed ID: 23538214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Superficial skin sensitivity impairment and skeletal stability after sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Nkenke E; Vairaktaris E; Bauersachs A; Hertrich K; Stelzle F; Scheller K
J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Nov; 23(6):1900-5. PubMed ID: 23172438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stability of Le Fort I Osteotomy With Propeller Graft for Canting Correction in Facial Asymmetry.
Lee JY; Kim YI; Kang HJ; Song JM; Park SB; Kim JR
J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Oct; 26(7):2077-80. PubMed ID: 26468788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Three-dimensional evaluation of skeletal and dental changes in patients with skeletal class III malocclusion and facial asymmetry after surgical-orthodontic treatment.
Ming Y; Hu Y; Wang T; Zhang J; Li Y; Xu W; Tan H; Ye H; Zheng L
J Xray Sci Technol; 2020; 28(4):783-798. PubMed ID: 32417830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
