89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25980197)
1. The decision-making of the Mental Health Review Tribunal in New Zealand.
Thom K; Black S; Panther G
J Law Med; 2015 Mar; 22(3):667-78. PubMed ID: 25980197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The unintended impact of the therapeutic intentions of the New Zealand Mental Health Review Tribunal? Therapeutic jurisprudence perspectives.
Diesfeld K; McKenna B
J Law Med; 2007 May; 14(4):566-74. PubMed ID: 17571786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The legal oversight of community treatment orders: A qualitative analysis of tribunal decision-making.
Jobling H
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2019; 62():95-103. PubMed ID: 30616860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. New Zealand Mental Health Review Tribunal characteristics and outcomes 1993-2011.
Thom K
Australas Psychiatry; 2014 Aug; 22(4):341-344. PubMed ID: 24963100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. When is it lawful to re-impose compulsory psychiatric treatment after discharge by a mental health tribunal?
Malhi MM; Ryan CJ
Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 2015 Nov; 49(11):955-7. PubMed ID: 26508799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of economic evaluation in local health care decision-making in England: a qualitative investigation.
Eddama O; Coast J
Health Policy; 2009 Mar; 89(3):261-70. PubMed ID: 18657336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An audit of the quality of reports to Mental Health Review Tribunals.
O'Muirithe B; Shankar R
Med Sci Law; 2008 Jul; 48(3):221-4. PubMed ID: 18754208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. How should cost-effectiveness analysis be used in health technology coverage decisions? Evidence from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence approach.
Williams I; Bryan S; McIver S
J Health Serv Res Policy; 2007 Apr; 12(2):73-9. PubMed ID: 17407655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.
Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Rawdin A; Johnson M; Kaltenthaler E; Paisley S; Papaioannou D; Shippam A
Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. PubMed ID: 20501062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [The analysis of physicians' work: announcing the end of attempts at in vitro fertilization].
Santiago-Delefosse M; Cahen F; Coeffin-Driol C
Encephale; 2003; 29(4 Pt 1):293-305. PubMed ID: 14615699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Priority setting and cardiac surgery: a qualitative case study.
Walton NA; Martin DK; Peter EH; Pringle DM; Singer PA
Health Policy; 2007 Mar; 80(3):444-58. PubMed ID: 16757057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Widening the circle: making Mental Health Review Tribunal hearings accessible in Indigenous, rural and remote settings.
Fisher S; Kilcullen D; Schrieber G; Hughes B
Australas Psychiatry; 2009 Aug; 17 Suppl 1():S83-7. PubMed ID: 19579115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. "This glorious twilight zone of uncertainty": mental health consultations in general practice in New Zealand.
Dew K; Dowell A; McLeod D; Collings S; Bushnell J
Soc Sci Med; 2005 Sep; 61(6):1189-200. PubMed ID: 15970230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Medical paternalism or legal imperialism: not the only alternatives for handling Saikewicz-type cases.
Buchanan A
Am J Law Med; 1979; 5(2):97-117. PubMed ID: 507063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Decision making the explicit evidence-based way: comparing benefits, harms and costs.
McArthur J; Dickinson A
Nurs Prax N Z; 1999 Mar; 14(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 10481662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Parent decision-making around the genetic testing of children for germline TP53 mutations.
Alderfer MA; Zelley K; Lindell RB; Novokmet A; Mai PL; Garber JE; Nathan D; Scollon S; Chun NM; Patenaude AF; Ford JM; Plon SE; Schiffman JD; Diller LR; Savage SA; Malkin D; Ford CA; Nichols KE
Cancer; 2015 Jan; 121(2):286-93. PubMed ID: 25223899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. New midwifery? A qualitative analysis of midwives' decision-making strategies.
Porter S; Crozier K; Sinclair M; Kernohan WG
J Adv Nurs; 2007 Dec; 60(5):525-34. PubMed ID: 17973716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Towards a relational model of decision-making in midwifery care.
Noseworthy DA; Phibbs SR; Benn CA
Midwifery; 2013 Jul; 29(7):e42-8. PubMed ID: 22877765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Perspectives on evidence-based practice from consumers in the US public mental health system.
Tanenbaum SJ
J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):699-706. PubMed ID: 19018898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
