These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25980198)

  • 1. Re-visiting Re X: hysterectomy, removal of reproductive capacity and the severely intellectually disabled child in New Zealand.
    Snelling J
    J Law Med; 2015 Mar; 22(3):679-97. PubMed ID: 25980198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sterilisation of the intellectually disabled: the need for legislative reform.
    Blackwood J
    Aust J Fam Law; 1991 Aug; 5(2):138-70. PubMed ID: 16086479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Involuntary sterilization of mentally retarded minors in Nebraska.
    Small MA
    Neb Law Rev; 1989; 68(1):410-29. PubMed ID: 16041875
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Non-consensual sterilization of the adult with learning disabilities.
    Knifton C
    Br J Nurs; 1998 Oct 22-Nov 11; 7(19):1172-6. PubMed ID: 9866467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An examination of Saskatchewan law on the sterilization of persons with mental disabilities.
    Newman D
    Sask Law Rev; 1999; 62(1):329-46. PubMed ID: 12680362
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Re D (A Minor) (Wardship:Sterilisation).
    Great Britain. England. High Court of Justice, Family Division
    All Engl Law Rep; 1975 Sep; 1976():326-36. PubMed ID: 11648637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attorney-General (QLD) v. Parents, In re S.
    Australia. Family Court
    Fed Law Rep; 1989 Nov; 98():41-56. PubMed ID: 12041104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Re Elizabeth (Ross, Jones J.).
    Australia. Family Court
    Fed Law Rep; 1989; 96():248-67. PubMed ID: 17001809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Treatment without consent: intervention by the court.
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 May; 290(6479):1409-10. PubMed ID: 11658570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Re K and Public Trustee.
    Canada. British Columbia. Court of Appeal
    Dom Law Rep; 1985 May; 19():255-85. PubMed ID: 12041079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Re B (A Minor) (Wardship: Sterilisation).
    Great Britain. House of Lords (30 Apr 1987) [and] Court of Appeal, Civil Div. (16 Mar 1987) [and] Family Div. at Newcastle Upon Tyne (20 Jan 1987)
    All Engl Law Rep; 1987 Apr; [1987]2():206-19. PubMed ID: 11648560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Proposed legislation for safely regulating the increasing number of living organ and tissue donations by minors.
    Shartle B
    LA Law Rev; 2001; 61(2):433-71. PubMed ID: 12666676
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The right to procreate: intellectual disability and the law.
    Mair ML
    Aust Coll Midwives Inc J; 1992 Dec; 5(4):16-20. PubMed ID: 1290418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sterilization--where mentally retarded and presumably fertile daughter cannot understand or exercise her constitutional right to voluntary sterilization, equity court has jurisdiction to empower parents to exercise right on her behalf.
    Fritschner SH
    J Fam Law; 1980 Apr; 18(3):648-53. PubMed ID: 11658339
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A doctor's and parent's dilemma: sterilisation of the intellectually disabled.
    Monahan P
    Law Inst J; 1991 Aug; 65(8):712-3. PubMed ID: 11659485
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sterilization of the mentally retarded minor: the Re K. case.
    Finch-Noyes CA
    Can J Fam Law; 1986; 5(1):277-99. PubMed ID: 11659190
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sterilization of minors.
    Boynton M
    Minn Med; 1994 Jan; 77(1):23-4. PubMed ID: 8127303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Re Jane.
    Australia. Family Court
    Fed Law Rep; 1988 Dec; 94():1-31. PubMed ID: 12041105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Medical treatment for minor children: the roles of parents, the state, the child, and the Supreme Court of the United States.
    Crutchfield CF
    Fam Relat; 1981 Apr; 30(2):165-77. PubMed ID: 11651710
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Righting a child's right to refuse medical treatment: Section 11 of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act and the Gillick competent child.
    Austin G
    Otago Law Rev; 1992; 7(4):578-96. PubMed ID: 11659776
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.