These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25980784)

  • 1. Attention and memory protection: Interactions between retrospective attention cueing and interference.
    Makovski T; Pertzov Y
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(9):1735-43. PubMed ID: 25980784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Getting more from visual working memory: Retro-cues enhance retrieval and protect from visual interference.
    Souza AS; Rerko L; Oberauer K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Jun; 42(6):890-910. PubMed ID: 26752731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Manipulating the focus of attention in working memory: Evidence for a protection of multiple items against perceptual interference.
    Barth A; Schneider D
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Jul; 55(7):e13062. PubMed ID: 29315628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Retro-dimension-cue benefit in visual working memory.
    Ye C; Hu Z; Ristaniemi T; Gendron M; Liu Q
    Sci Rep; 2016 Oct; 6():35573. PubMed ID: 27774983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The reliability of retro-cues determines the fate of noncued visual working memory representations.
    Gunseli E; van Moorselaar D; Meeter M; Olivers CN
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Oct; 22(5):1334-41. PubMed ID: 25563713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Invalid retro-cues can eliminate the retro-cue benefit: Evidence for a hybridized account.
    Gözenman F; Tanoue RT; Metoyer T; Berryhill ME
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Oct; 40(5):1748-54. PubMed ID: 25045904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Only pre-cueing but no retro-cueing effects emerge with masked arrow cues.
    Janczyk M; Reuss H
    Conscious Cogn; 2016 May; 42():93-100. PubMed ID: 26998561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Probabilistic retro-cues do not determine state in visual working memory.
    Dube B; Lumsden A; Al-Aidroos N
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Apr; 26(2):641-646. PubMed ID: 30276638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Different effects of color-based and location-based selection on visual working memory.
    Li Q; Saiki J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Feb; 77(2):450-63. PubMed ID: 25338537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Orienting attention in visual working memory reduces interference from memory probes.
    Makovski T; Sussman R; Jiang YV
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Mar; 34(2):369-80. PubMed ID: 18315412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing the prioritization of items and feature-dimensions in visual working memory.
    Hajonides JE; van Ede F; Stokes MG; Nobre AC
    J Vis; 2020 Aug; 20(8):25. PubMed ID: 32841318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Task-dependent effects of voluntary space-based and involuntary feature-based attention on visual working memory.
    Qian J; Zhang K; Lei Q; Han Y; Li W
    Psychol Res; 2020 Jul; 84(5):1304-1319. PubMed ID: 30840142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Retro-Cue Benefit for Verbal Material and Its Influence on the Probability of Intrusions Under Dual-Task Conditions.
    Krefeld-Schwalb A
    Exp Psychol; 2018 May; 65(3):128-138. PubMed ID: 29905113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing the robustness of feature-based selection in visual working memory.
    Arnicane A; Souza AS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2021 May; 47(5):731-758. PubMed ID: 34264730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Shifting attention among working memory representations: testing cue type, awareness, and strategic control.
    Berryhill ME; Richmond LL; Shay CS; Olson IR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(3):426-38. PubMed ID: 21846267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bottom-up perceptual salience and top-down retro-cues concurrently determine state in visual working memory.
    Fan L; Zhang L; Diao L; Xu M; Chen R; Zhang X
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Mar; 74(3):459-470. PubMed ID: 32988297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Retrospective attention enhances visual working memory in the young but not the old: an ERP study.
    Duarte A; Hearons P; Jiang Y; Delvin MC; Newsome RN; Verhaeghen P
    Psychophysiology; 2013 May; 50(5):465-76. PubMed ID: 23445536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A neural model of retrospective attention in visual working memory.
    Bays PM; Taylor R
    Cogn Psychol; 2018 Feb; 100():43-52. PubMed ID: 29272732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In competition for the attentional template: can multiple items within visual working memory guide attention?
    van Moorselaar D; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Aug; 40(4):1450-64. PubMed ID: 24730738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adverse orienting effects on visual working memory encoding and maintenance.
    Wang B; Yan C; Wang Z; Olivers CNL; Theeuwes J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Aug; 24(4):1261-1267. PubMed ID: 27896633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.