These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25981327)

  • 1. Long-Term Outcome of Acetabular Reconstruction Using a Kerboull-Type Acetabular Reinforcement Device with Hydroxyapetite Granule and Structural Autograft for AAOS type II and III Acetabular Defects.
    Kim Y; Tanaka C; Kanoe H
    J Arthroplasty; 2015 Oct; 30(10):1810-4. PubMed ID: 25981327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bone Remodeling in Acetabular Reconstruction Using a Kerboull-Type Reinforcement Device and Structural Bone-Grafting in Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Oe K; Iida H; Tsuda K; Nakamura T; Okamoto N; Ueda Y
    J Arthroplasty; 2017 Mar; 32(3):908-914. PubMed ID: 27687810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using the Kerboull Acetabular Reinforcement Device and Structural Allograft for Severe Defects of the Acetabulum.
    Makita H; Kerboull M; Inaba Y; Tezuka T; Saito T; Kerboull L
    J Arthroplasty; 2017 Nov; 32(11):3502-3509. PubMed ID: 28711340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Cementless Cup Supporter and Iliac Autograft: A Minimum of 15-Year Follow-Up.
    Yoshino K; Tsukeoka T; Tsuneizumi Y; Lee TH; Nakamura J; Suzuki M; Ohtori S
    J Arthroplasty; 2017 Nov; 32(11):3495-3501. PubMed ID: 28697865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Revision total hip arthroplasty using the Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device for Paprosky type III defects involving the inferior margin of the acetabulum: a minimum five-year follow-up study.
    Gibon E; Barut N; Courpied JP; Hamadouche M
    Bone Joint J; 2018 Jun; 100-B(6):725-732. PubMed ID: 29855248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Acetabular reconstruction using a Kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement device and hydroxyapatite granules: a 3- to 8-year follow-up study.
    Tanaka C; Shikata J; Ikenaga M; Takahashi M
    J Arthroplasty; 2003 Sep; 18(6):719-25. PubMed ID: 14513444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acetabular revision using a Kerboull-type reinforcement device through direct anterior approach.
    Tamaki T; Ninomiya T; Jonishi K; Miura Y; Oinuma K; Shiratsuchi H
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2018; 26(2):2309499018782553. PubMed ID: 29945476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Revision total hip arthroplasty using a Kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement device with bone allograft: minimum 4.5-year follow-up results and mechanical analysis.
    Akiyama H; Yamamoto K; Tsukanaka M; Kawanabe K; Otsuka H; So K; Goto K; Nakamura T
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Sep; 93(9):1194-200. PubMed ID: 21911530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mid-term results of acetabular reconstruction using a Kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement device.
    Hori J; Yasunaga Y; Yamasaki T; Yoshida T; Oshima S; Yamasaki K; Matsuo T; Ochi M
    Int Orthop; 2012 Jan; 36(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 21574052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Radiological evaluation of allograft reconstruction in acetabulum with Ganz reinforcement ring in revision total hip replacement.
    Uchiyama K; Takahira N; Fukushima K; Yamamoto T; Moriya M; Itoman M
    J Orthop Sci; 2010 Nov; 15(6):764-71. PubMed ID: 21116894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Revision total hip replacement using the Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device with morsellised or bulk graft: results at a mean follow-up of 8.7 years.
    Kawanabe K; Akiyama H; Onishi E; Nakamura T
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2007 Jan; 89(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 17259411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Acetabular reconstruction with the Kerboull-type plate at mid-term follow-up: survivorship analysis and prognostic factors for loosening.
    Kamada T; Imai H; Mahima N; Takeba J; Miyawaki J; Miura H
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2018 Apr; 28(3):485-491. PubMed ID: 29026992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Revision total hip arthroplasty using a Kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement device and allogeneic structural bone graft.
    Fujimoto Y; Nakamura S; Ijuin T; Iuchi T; Nakajo M; Taniguchi N
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2022; 30(2):10225536221119719. PubMed ID: 35976732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Acetabular bone defects in THA revision: Reconstruction using morsellised virus-inactivated bone allograft and reinforcement ring. Seven-year outcomes in 95 patients.
    Villatte G; Erivan R; Salles G; Pereira B; Galvin M; Descamps S; Boisgard S
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2017 Jun; 103(4):543-548. PubMed ID: 28366746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The midterm and long-term effects of acetabular roof ring and Burch-Schneider anti-protusio cages in acetabular revisions for patients with acetabular bone deficiency.
    Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; ; . PubMed ID: 26511685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.