These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25983173)

  • 1. Coronary fractional flow reserve in bifurcation stenoses: what have we learned?
    Lee JM; Koo BK; Kumsars I; Curzen N; Thondapu V; Barlis P; Escaned J
    EuroIntervention; 2015; 11 Suppl V():V59-63. PubMed ID: 25983173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optical coherence tomography imaging during percutaneous coronary intervention impacts physician decision-making: ILUMIEN I study.
    Wijns W; Shite J; Jones MR; Lee SW; Price MJ; Fabbiocchi F; Barbato E; Akasaka T; Bezerra H; Holmes D
    Eur Heart J; 2015 Dec; 36(47):3346-55. PubMed ID: 26242713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of Fractional FLow Reserve And Intravascular ultrasound-guided Intervention Strategy for Clinical OUtcomes in Patients with InteRmediate Stenosis (FLAVOUR): Rationale and design of a randomized clinical trial.
    Kang J; Koo BK; Hu X; Lee JM; Hahn JY; Yang HM; Shin ES; Nam CW; Doh JH; Lee BK; Ahn C; Wang J; Tahk SJ
    Am Heart J; 2018 May; 199():7-12. PubMed ID: 29754669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fractional flow reserve-guided coronary artery bypass grafting: can intraoperative physiologic imaging guide decision making?
    Ferguson TB; Chen C; Babb JD; Efird JT; Daggubati R; Cahill JM
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2013 Oct; 146(4):824-835.e1. PubMed ID: 23915918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. FFR in bifurcation stenting: what have we learned?
    Koo BK; De Bruyne B
    EuroIntervention; 2010 Dec; 6 Suppl J():J94-8. PubMed ID: 21930499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of fractional flow reserve to guide stent implantation.
    Mangiacapra F; Di Serafino L; Barbato E
    Minerva Cardioangiol; 2011 Feb; 59(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 21285930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prospective Randomized Comparison of Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Optical Coherence Tomography to Guide Revascularization of Intermediate Coronary Stenoses: One-Month Results.
    Leone AM; Burzotta F; Aurigemma C; De Maria GL; Zambrano A; Zimbardo G; Arioti M; Cerracchio E; Vergallo R; Trani C; Crea F
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2019 Aug; 8(15):e012772. PubMed ID: 31331219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Revascularization decisions in patients with stable angina and intermediate lesions: results of the international survey on interventional strategy.
    Toth GG; Toth B; Johnson NP; De Vroey F; Di Serafino L; Pyxaras S; Rusinaru D; Di Gioia G; Pellicano M; Barbato E; Van Mieghem C; Heyndrickx GR; De Bruyne B; Wijns W
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Dec; 7(6):751-9. PubMed ID: 25336468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The impact of age on fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) trial substudy.
    Lim HS; Tonino PA; De Bruyne B; Yong AS; Lee BK; Pijls NH; Fearon WF
    Int J Cardiol; 2014 Nov; 177(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 25499342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bifurcation lesions: Functional assessment by fractional flow reserve vs. anatomical assessment using conventional and dedicated bifurcation quantitative coronary angiogram.
    Sarno G; Garg S; Onuma Y; Girasis C; Tonino P; Morel MA; van Es GA; Pijls N; Serruys PW
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Nov; 76(6):817-23. PubMed ID: 20578164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Physiologic evaluation of bifurcation lesions using fractional flow reserve.
    Koo BK
    J Interv Cardiol; 2009 Apr; 22(2):110-3. PubMed ID: 19379467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Image-based assessment of fractional flow reserve.
    Tu S; Bourantas CV; Nørgaard BL; Kassab GS; Koo BK; Reiber JH
    EuroIntervention; 2015; 11 Suppl V():V50-4. PubMed ID: 25983171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. FFR and iFR guided percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Matsuo H; Kawase Y
    Cardiovasc Interv Ther; 2016 Jul; 31(3):183-95. PubMed ID: 27221377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How should I treat multiple coronary aneurysms with severe stenoses?
    Warisawa T; Naganuma T; Nakamura S; Hartmann M; Stoel MG; Louwerenburg JH; Basalus MW; von Birgelen C; Koo BK
    EuroIntervention; 2015 Nov; 11(7):843-6. PubMed ID: 26603993
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. When and how to perform the provisional approach for distal LM stenting.
    Park SJ; Ahn JM; Foin N; Louvard Y
    EuroIntervention; 2015; 11 Suppl V():V120-4. PubMed ID: 25983144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Coronary bifurcation lesions: Present status and future perspectives.
    Leesar MA; Hakeem A; Azarnoush K; Thuesen L
    Int J Cardiol; 2015; 187():48-57. PubMed ID: 25828312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantitative angiography and optical coherence tomography for the functional assessment of nonobstructive coronary stenoses: comparison with fractional flow reserve.
    Pyxaras SA; Tu S; Barbato E; Barbati G; Di Serafino L; De Vroey F; Toth G; Mangiacapra F; Sinagra G; De Bruyne B; Reiber JH; Wijns W
    Am Heart J; 2013 Dec; 166(6):1010-1018.e1. PubMed ID: 24268215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of fractional flow reserve measurement on the clinical management of patients with coronary artery disease evaluated with noninvasive stress tests prior to cardiac catheterization.
    Lachance P; Déry JP; Rodés-Cabau J; Potvin JM; Barbeau G; Bertrand OF; Gleeton O; Larose E; Nguyen CM; Noël B; Proulx G; Roy L; De Larochellière R
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2008; 9(4):229-34. PubMed ID: 18928947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of hemodynamically severe coronary stenosis as determined by fractional flow reserve with frequency domain optical coherence tomography measured anatomical parameters.
    Zafar H; Ullah I; Dinneen K; Matiullah S; Hanley A; Leahy MJ; Sharif F
    J Cardiol; 2014 Jul; 64(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 24368093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. 3D OCT versus FFR for jailed side-branch ostial stenoses.
    Ha J; Kim JS; Mintz GS; Kim BK; Shin DH; Ko YG; Choi D; Jang Y; Hong MK
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Feb; 7(2):204-5. PubMed ID: 24524746
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.