159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25983764)
1. Evaluation of different aspects of power Doppler sonography in differentiating and prognostication of breast masses.
Sirous M; Sirous R; Nejad FK; Rabeie E; Mansouri M
J Res Med Sci; 2015 Feb; 20(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 25983764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The use of unenhanced Doppler sonography in the evaluation of solid breast lesions.
del Cura JL; Elizagaray E; Zabala R; Legórburu A; Grande D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jun; 184(6):1788-94. PubMed ID: 15908531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Differentiation of benign and malignant adnexal masses: relative value of gray-scale, color Doppler, and spectral Doppler sonography.
Stein SM; Laifer-Narin S; Johnson MB; Roman LD; Muderspach LI; Tyszka JM; Ralls PW
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Feb; 164(2):381-6. PubMed ID: 7839975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differentiation of benign and malignant tumors of the parotid gland: value of pulsed Doppler and color Doppler sonography.
Schick S; Steiner E; Gahleitner A; Böhm P; Helbich T; Ba-Ssalamah A; Mostbeck G
Eur Radiol; 1998; 8(8):1462-7. PubMed ID: 9853238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Value of contrast-enhanced power Doppler sonography using a microbubble echo-enhancing agent in evaluation of small breast lesions.
Kook SH; Kwag HJ
J Clin Ultrasound; 2003 Jun; 31(5):227-38. PubMed ID: 12767017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Doppler sonography of adnexal masses: the predictive value of the pulsatility index in benign and malignant disease.
Salem S; White LM; Lai J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1147-50. PubMed ID: 7976891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast masses: color Doppler, power Doppler, and spectral analysis findings.
Hayashi N; Miyamoto Y; Nakata N; Irie T; Ikegami M; Asao K; Tada S
J Clin Ultrasound; 1998 Jun; 26(5):231-8. PubMed ID: 9608365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Characterization of adnexal masses: combination of color Doppler and conventional sonography compared with spectral Doppler analysis alone and conventional sonography alone.
Buy JN; Ghossain MA; Hugol D; Hassen K; Sciot C; Truc JB; Poitout P; Vadrot D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Feb; 166(2):385-93. PubMed ID: 8553953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contrast-enhanced power Doppler sonography in breast lesions: effect on differential diagnosis after mammography and gray scale sonography.
Zdemir A; Kiliç K; Ozdemir H; Yücel C; Andaç S; Colak M
J Ultrasound Med; 2004 Feb; 23(2):183-95; quiz 196-7. PubMed ID: 14992355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validity of colour and pulsed Doppler US and tumour marker CA 125 in differentiation between benign and malignant ovarian masses.
Antonić J; Rakar S
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 1996; 17(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 8750512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of solid breast lesions with power Doppler sonography.
Kook SH; Park HW; Lee YR; Lee YU; Pae WK; Park YL
J Clin Ultrasound; 1999 Jun; 27(5):231-7. PubMed ID: 10355886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Contrast enhanced power Doppler and color Doppler ultrasound in breast masses: Efficiency in diagnosis and contributions to differential diagnosis].
Algül A; Balci P; Seçil M; Canda T
Tani Girisim Radyol; 2003 Jun; 9(2):199-206. PubMed ID: 14661490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ovarian masses: can benign and malignant lesions be differentiated with color and pulsed Doppler US?
Brown DL; Frates MC; Laing FC; DiSalvo DN; Doubilet PM; Benson CB; Waitzkin ED; Muto MG
Radiology; 1994 Feb; 190(2):333-6. PubMed ID: 8284377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Color Doppler sonography of benign and malignant pulmonary masses.
Yuan A; Chang DB; Yu CJ; Kuo SH; Luh KT; Yang PC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Sep; 163(3):545-9. PubMed ID: 8079841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Three-dimensional power Doppler vascular sampling: a new method for predicting ovarian cancer in vascularized complex adnexal masses.
Alcázar JL; Mercé LT; García Manero M
J Ultrasound Med; 2005 May; 24(5):689-96. PubMed ID: 15840800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Colour and pulsed Doppler US and tumour marker CA 125 in differentiation between benign and malignant ovarian masses.
Antonić J; Rakar S
Anticancer Res; 1995; 15(4):1527-32. PubMed ID: 7654041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Color Doppler blood flow measurements and microvessel density assessment in ovarian tumors].
Czekierdowski A; Szymański M; Szumiło J; Kotarski J
Ginekol Pol; 2003 Sep; 74(9):695-700. PubMed ID: 14674110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of diagnostic value of Doppler ultrasound in the diagnosis of malignant breast masses.
Mehdikhani B; Benam M; Moradkhani A; Roostaee A; Bahman SS; Barmayoon P; Dezyani G; Safarpour Lima Z
Eur J Transl Myol; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38536011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Resistance to blood flow in ovarian tumors: correlation between resistance index and histological pattern of vascularization.
Kidron D; Bernheim J; Aviram R; Cohen I; Fishman A; Beyth Y; Tepper R
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jun; 13(6):425-30. PubMed ID: 10423807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Role of color and power doppler imaging in differentiating between malignant and benign solid breast masses.
Lee SW; Choi HY; Baek SY; Lim SM
J Clin Ultrasound; 2002 Oct; 30(8):459-64. PubMed ID: 12242733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
