These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

394 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25985725)

  • 1. Comparison of the effectiveness of cardiopulmonary resuscitation with standard manual chest compressions and the use of TrueCPR and PocketCPR feedback devices.
    Kurowski A; Szarpak Ł; Bogdański Ł; Zaśko P; Czyżewski Ł
    Kardiol Pol; 2015; 73(10):924-30. PubMed ID: 25985725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing three CPR feedback devices and standard BLS in a single rescuer scenario: a randomised simulation study.
    Zapletal B; Greif R; Stumpf D; Nierscher FJ; Frantal S; Haugk M; Ruetzler K; Schlimp C; Fischer H
    Resuscitation; 2014 Apr; 85(4):560-6. PubMed ID: 24215730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Randomized trial of the chest compressions effectiveness comparing 3 feedback CPR devices and standard basic life support by nurses.
    Truszewski Z; Szarpak L; Kurowski A; Evrin T; Zasko P; Bogdanski L; Czyzewski L
    Am J Emerg Med; 2016 Mar; 34(3):381-5. PubMed ID: 26612703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Chest Compressions Metrics Measured Using the Laerdal Skill Reporter and Q-CPR: A Simulation Study.
    Davey P; Whatman C; Dicker B
    Simul Healthc; 2015 Oct; 10(5):257-62. PubMed ID: 26426556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Can the British Heart Foundation PocketCPR application improve the performance of chest compressions during bystander resuscitation: A randomised crossover manikin study.
    Eaton G; Renshaw J; Gregory P; Kilner T
    Health Informatics J; 2018 Mar; 24(1):14-23. PubMed ID: 27402135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accurate feedback of chest compression depth on a manikin on a soft surface with correction for total body displacement.
    Beesems SG; Koster RW
    Resuscitation; 2014 Nov; 85(11):1439-43. PubMed ID: 25150184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improved hemodynamic performance with a novel chest compression device during treatment of in-hospital cardiac arrest.
    Timerman S; Cardoso LF; Ramires JA; Halperin H
    Resuscitation; 2004 Jun; 61(3):273-80. PubMed ID: 15172705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A 10-s rest improves chest compression quality during hands-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a prospective, randomized crossover study using a manikin model.
    Min MK; Yeom SR; Ryu JH; Kim YI; Park MR; Han SK; Lee SH; Cho SJ
    Resuscitation; 2013 Sep; 84(9):1279-84. PubMed ID: 23402967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improved neurological outcome with continuous chest compressions compared with 30:2 compressions-to-ventilations cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a realistic swine model of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
    Ewy GA; Zuercher M; Hilwig RW; Sanders AB; Berg RA; Otto CW; Hayes MM; Kern KB
    Circulation; 2007 Nov; 116(22):2525-30. PubMed ID: 17998457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bystander fatigue and CPR quality by older bystanders: a randomized crossover trial comparing continuous chest compressions and 30:2 compressions to ventilations.
    Liu S; Vaillancourt C; Kasaboski A; Taljaard M
    CJEM; 2016 Nov; 18(6):461-468. PubMed ID: 27650514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mechanical versus manual chest compression for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (PARAMEDIC): a pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial.
    Perkins GD; Lall R; Quinn T; Deakin CD; Cooke MW; Horton J; Lamb SE; Slowther AM; Woollard M; Carson A; Smyth M; Whitfield R; Williams A; Pocock H; Black JJ; Wright J; Han K; Gates S;
    Lancet; 2015 Mar; 385(9972):947-55. PubMed ID: 25467566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. LUCAS compared to manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation is more effective during helicopter rescue-a prospective, randomized, cross-over manikin study.
    Putzer G; Braun P; Zimmermann A; Pedross F; Strapazzon G; Brugger H; Paal P
    Am J Emerg Med; 2013 Feb; 31(2):384-9. PubMed ID: 23000324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effectiveness of chest compression feedback during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in lateral tilted and semirecumbent positions: a randomised controlled simulation study.
    Song Y; Oh J; Chee Y; Cho Y; Lee S; Lim TH
    Anaesthesia; 2015 Nov; 70(11):1235-41. PubMed ID: 26349025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [New mechanical methods for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Literature study and analysis of effectiveness].
    Lindner KH; Wenzel V
    Anaesthesist; 1997 Mar; 46(3):220-30. PubMed ID: 9163267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Manual versus Mechanical Chest Compressions on Surfaces of Varying Softness with or without Backboards: A Randomized, Crossover Manikin Study.
    Putzer G; Fiala A; Braun P; Neururer S; Biechl K; Keilig B; Ploner W; Fop E; Paal P
    J Emerg Med; 2016 Apr; 50(4):594-600.e1. PubMed ID: 26607696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of standard and over-the-head method of chest compressions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation - a simulation study.
    Ćwiertnia M; Kawecki M; Ilczak T; Mikulska M; Dutka M; Bobiński R
    BMC Emerg Med; 2019 Nov; 19(1):73. PubMed ID: 31771511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation for cardiac arrest: the importance of uninterrupted chest compressions in cardiac arrest resuscitation.
    Cunningham LM; Mattu A; O'Connor RE; Brady WJ
    Am J Emerg Med; 2012 Oct; 30(8):1630-8. PubMed ID: 22633716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Efficacy of LUCAS in Prehospital Cardiac Arrest Scenarios: A Crossover Mannequin Study.
    Gyory RA; Buchle SE; Rodgers D; Lubin JS
    West J Emerg Med; 2017 Apr; 18(3):437-445. PubMed ID: 28435494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rescuer-limited cardiopulmonary resuscitation as an alternative to 2-min switched CPR in the setting of inhospital cardiac arrest: a randomised cross-over study.
    Jo CH; Cho GC; Ahn JH; Park YS; Lee CH
    Emerg Med J; 2015 Jul; 32(7):539-43. PubMed ID: 25092797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mechanical versus manual chest compressions for cardiac arrest.
    Brooks SC; Hassan N; Bigham BL; Morrison LJ
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Feb; (2):CD007260. PubMed ID: 24574099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.