These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25985886)
41. Refractive surgery in the late adulthood and adolescent age groups. Hecht I; Achiron A; Ben Haim L; Sorin V; Mimouni M; Kaiserman I Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2019 Sep; 257(9):2057-2063. PubMed ID: 31218400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Off-axis refraction and aberrations following conventional laser in situ keratomileusis. Ma L; Atchison DA; Charman WN J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Mar; 31(3):489-98. PubMed ID: 15811736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK With and Without the Adjuvant Use of Mitomycin C to Correct Hyperopia. Garcia-Gonzalez M; Iglesias-Iglesias M; Drake Rodriguez-Casanova P; Gros-Otero J; Teus MA J Refract Surg; 2018 Jan; 34(1):23-28. PubMed ID: 29315438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Ten-year follow-up of laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia of up to -10 diopters. Alió JL; Muftuoglu O; Ortiz D; Pérez-Santonja JJ; Artola A; Ayala MJ; Garcia MJ; de Luna GC Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Jan; 145(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 18154754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Spherical and aspherical photorefractive keratectomy and laser in-situ keratomileusis for moderate to high myopia: two prospective, randomized clinical trials. Summit technology PRK-LASIK study group. Steinert RF; Hersh PS Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 1998; 96():197-221; discussion 221-7. PubMed ID: 10360290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Comparison of the visual results after SMILE and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK for myopia. Lin F; Xu Y; Yang Y J Refract Surg; 2014 Apr; 30(4):248-54. PubMed ID: 24702576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Corneal approach to hyperopic presbyopia treatment: six-month outcomes of a new multifocal excimer laser in situ keratomileusis procedure. Ryan A; O'Keefe M J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Aug; 39(8):1226-33. PubMed ID: 23747205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Refractive regression after laser in situ keratomileusis. Yan MK; Chang JS; Chan TC Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2018 Nov; 46(8):934-944. PubMed ID: 29700964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. The effect of procedure room temperature and humidity on LASIK outcomes. Seider MI; McLeod SD; Porco TC; Schallhorn SC Ophthalmology; 2013 Nov; 120(11):2204-8. PubMed ID: 23769199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Predictability of corneal flap thickness in laser in situ keratomileusis using a 200 kHz femtosecond laser. Cummings AB; Cummings BK; Kelly GE J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Mar; 39(3):378-85. PubMed ID: 23352500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Four-year visual, refractive, and contrast sensitivity outcomes after wavefront-guided myopic LASIK using an advanced excimer laser platform. Shaheen MS; Massoud TH; Ezzeldin H; Khalifa MA J Refract Surg; 2013 Dec; 29(12):816-22. PubMed ID: 24168789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. [Excimer retreatment for undercorrection or regression after laser in situ keratomileusis]. Qi H; Xia Y; Chen Y; Zhu X Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2002 Feb; 38(2):72-5. PubMed ID: 11955303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Risk Factors for Re-treatment Following Hyperopic LASIK. Mimouni M; Flores V; Sela T; Munzer G; Kaiserman I J Refract Surg; 2018 May; 34(5):316-320. PubMed ID: 29738587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]