These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25985933)
1. A Review of the Development and Application of Generic Multi-Attribute Utility Instruments for Paediatric Populations. Chen G; Ratcliffe J Pharmacoeconomics; 2015 Oct; 33(10):1013-28. PubMed ID: 25985933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Systematic Review of the Psychometric Performance of Generic Childhood Multi-attribute Utility Instruments. Kwon J; Smith S; Raghunandan R; Howell M; Huynh E; Kim S; Bentley T; Roberts N; Lancsar E; Howard K; Wong G; Craig J; Petrou S Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2023 Jul; 21(4):559-584. PubMed ID: 37133712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Which multi-attribute utility instruments are recommended for use in cost-utility analysis? A review of national health technology assessment (HTA) guidelines. Kennedy-Martin M; Slaap B; Herdman M; van Reenen M; Kennedy-Martin T; Greiner W; Busschbach J; Boye KS Eur J Health Econ; 2020 Nov; 21(8):1245-1257. PubMed ID: 32514643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessing Outcomes for Cost-Utility Analysis in Children and Adolescents With Mental Health Problems: Are Multiattribute Utility Instruments Fit for Purpose? Mihalopoulos C; Chen G; Scott JG; Bucholc J; Allen C; Coghill D; Jenkins P; Norman R; Ratcliffe J; Richardson J; Stathis S; Viney R Value Health; 2023 May; 26(5):733-741. PubMed ID: 36535579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Head-to-Head Comparison of the EQ-5D-5L and AQoL-8D Multi-Attribute Utility Instruments in Patients Who Have Previously Undergone Bariatric Surgery. Campbell JA; Palmer AJ; Venn A; Sharman M; Otahal P; Neil A Patient; 2016 Aug; 9(4):311-22. PubMed ID: 26841910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing the Health-Related Quality of Life of Australian Adolescents: An Empirical Comparison of the Child Health Utility 9D and EQ-5D-Y Instruments. Chen G; Flynn T; Stevens K; Brazier J; Huynh E; Sawyer M; Roberts R; Ratcliffe J Value Health; 2015 Jun; 18(4):432-8. PubMed ID: 26091597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Review of Valuation Methods of Preference-Based Measures of Health for Economic Evaluation in Child and Adolescent Populations: Where are We Now and Where are We Going? Rowen D; Rivero-Arias O; Devlin N; Ratcliffe J Pharmacoeconomics; 2020 Apr; 38(4):325-340. PubMed ID: 31903522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessing outcomes for cost-utility analysis in depression: comparison of five multi-attribute utility instruments with two depression-specific outcome measures. Mihalopoulos C; Chen G; Iezzi A; Khan MA; Richardson J Br J Psychiatry; 2014 Nov; 205(5):390-7. PubMed ID: 25257063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of generic, indirect utility measures (the HUI2, HUI3, SF-6D, and the EQ-5D) and disease-specific instruments (the RAQoL and the HAQ) in rheumatoid arthritis. Marra CA; Woolcott JC; Kopec JA; Shojania K; Offer R; Brazier JE; Esdaile JM; Anis AH Soc Sci Med; 2005 Apr; 60(7):1571-82. PubMed ID: 15652688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quality-adjusted life-years lack quality in pediatric care: a critical review of published cost-utility studies in child health. Griebsch I; Coast J; Brown J Pediatrics; 2005 May; 115(5):e600-14. PubMed ID: 15867026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The impact of depression on health-related quality of life and wellbeing: identifying important dimensions and assessing their inclusion in multi-attribute utility instruments. Engel L; Chen G; Richardson J; Mihalopoulos C Qual Life Res; 2018 Nov; 27(11):2873-2884. PubMed ID: 30006664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Can multi-attribute utility instruments adequately account for subjective well-being? Richardson J; Chen G; Khan MA; Iezzi A Med Decis Making; 2015 Apr; 35(3):292-304. PubMed ID: 25623064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Review of the Development and Application of Generic Preference-Based Instruments with the Older Population. Cleland J; Hutchinson C; Khadka J; Milte R; Ratcliffe J Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2019 Dec; 17(6):781-801. PubMed ID: 31512086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A systematic literature review of health state utility values in head and neck cancer. Meregaglia M; Cairns J Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2017 Sep; 15(1):174. PubMed ID: 28865475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. EQ-5D-Y as a Health-Related Quality of Life Instrument for Children and Adolescents: The Instrument's Characteristics, Development, Current Use, and Challenges of Developing Its Value Set. Kreimeier S; Greiner W Value Health; 2019 Jan; 22(1):31-37. PubMed ID: 30661631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Developing adolescent-specific health state values for economic evaluation: an application of profile case best-worst scaling to the Child Health Utility 9D. Ratcliffe J; Flynn T; Terlich F; Stevens K; Brazier J; Sawyer M Pharmacoeconomics; 2012 Aug; 30(8):713-27. PubMed ID: 22788261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. How Well Do the Generic Multi-attribute Utility Instruments Incorporate Patient and Public Views Into Their Descriptive Systems? Stevens KJ Patient; 2016 Feb; 9(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 25663152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An Updated Systematic Review of Studies Mapping (or Cross-Walking) Measures of Health-Related Quality of Life to Generic Preference-Based Measures to Generate Utility Values. Mukuria C; Rowen D; Harnan S; Rawdin A; Wong R; Ara R; Brazier J Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2019 Jun; 17(3):295-313. PubMed ID: 30945127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparing multi-attribute utility instruments: CP-6D, a Cerebral palsy specific instrument, vs AQoL-4D. Bahrampour M; Downes M; Scuffham PA; Byrnes J Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2022 Mar; 22(2):217-224. PubMed ID: 33779449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]