290 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25985933)
1. A Review of the Development and Application of Generic Multi-Attribute Utility Instruments for Paediatric Populations.
Chen G; Ratcliffe J
Pharmacoeconomics; 2015 Oct; 33(10):1013-28. PubMed ID: 25985933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Systematic Review of the Psychometric Performance of Generic Childhood Multi-attribute Utility Instruments.
Kwon J; Smith S; Raghunandan R; Howell M; Huynh E; Kim S; Bentley T; Roberts N; Lancsar E; Howard K; Wong G; Craig J; Petrou S
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2023 Jul; 21(4):559-584. PubMed ID: 37133712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Which multi-attribute utility instruments are recommended for use in cost-utility analysis? A review of national health technology assessment (HTA) guidelines.
Kennedy-Martin M; Slaap B; Herdman M; van Reenen M; Kennedy-Martin T; Greiner W; Busschbach J; Boye KS
Eur J Health Econ; 2020 Nov; 21(8):1245-1257. PubMed ID: 32514643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessing Outcomes for Cost-Utility Analysis in Children and Adolescents With Mental Health Problems: Are Multiattribute Utility Instruments Fit for Purpose?
Mihalopoulos C; Chen G; Scott JG; Bucholc J; Allen C; Coghill D; Jenkins P; Norman R; Ratcliffe J; Richardson J; Stathis S; Viney R
Value Health; 2023 May; 26(5):733-741. PubMed ID: 36535579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Head-to-Head Comparison of the EQ-5D-5L and AQoL-8D Multi-Attribute Utility Instruments in Patients Who Have Previously Undergone Bariatric Surgery.
Campbell JA; Palmer AJ; Venn A; Sharman M; Otahal P; Neil A
Patient; 2016 Aug; 9(4):311-22. PubMed ID: 26841910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing the Health-Related Quality of Life of Australian Adolescents: An Empirical Comparison of the Child Health Utility 9D and EQ-5D-Y Instruments.
Chen G; Flynn T; Stevens K; Brazier J; Huynh E; Sawyer M; Roberts R; Ratcliffe J
Value Health; 2015 Jun; 18(4):432-8. PubMed ID: 26091597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Review of Valuation Methods of Preference-Based Measures of Health for Economic Evaluation in Child and Adolescent Populations: Where are We Now and Where are We Going?
Rowen D; Rivero-Arias O; Devlin N; Ratcliffe J
Pharmacoeconomics; 2020 Apr; 38(4):325-340. PubMed ID: 31903522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessing outcomes for cost-utility analysis in depression: comparison of five multi-attribute utility instruments with two depression-specific outcome measures.
Mihalopoulos C; Chen G; Iezzi A; Khan MA; Richardson J
Br J Psychiatry; 2014 Nov; 205(5):390-7. PubMed ID: 25257063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of generic, indirect utility measures (the HUI2, HUI3, SF-6D, and the EQ-5D) and disease-specific instruments (the RAQoL and the HAQ) in rheumatoid arthritis.
Marra CA; Woolcott JC; Kopec JA; Shojania K; Offer R; Brazier JE; Esdaile JM; Anis AH
Soc Sci Med; 2005 Apr; 60(7):1571-82. PubMed ID: 15652688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quality-adjusted life-years lack quality in pediatric care: a critical review of published cost-utility studies in child health.
Griebsch I; Coast J; Brown J
Pediatrics; 2005 May; 115(5):e600-14. PubMed ID: 15867026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The impact of depression on health-related quality of life and wellbeing: identifying important dimensions and assessing their inclusion in multi-attribute utility instruments.
Engel L; Chen G; Richardson J; Mihalopoulos C
Qual Life Res; 2018 Nov; 27(11):2873-2884. PubMed ID: 30006664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Can multi-attribute utility instruments adequately account for subjective well-being?
Richardson J; Chen G; Khan MA; Iezzi A
Med Decis Making; 2015 Apr; 35(3):292-304. PubMed ID: 25623064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Review of the Development and Application of Generic Preference-Based Instruments with the Older Population.
Cleland J; Hutchinson C; Khadka J; Milte R; Ratcliffe J
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2019 Dec; 17(6):781-801. PubMed ID: 31512086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evidence on the longitudinal construct validity of major generic and utility measures of health-related quality of life in teens with depression.
Dickerson JF; Feeny DH; Clarke GN; MacMillan AL; Lynch FL
Qual Life Res; 2018 Feb; 27(2):447-454. PubMed ID: 29149441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A systematic literature review of health state utility values in head and neck cancer.
Meregaglia M; Cairns J
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2017 Sep; 15(1):174. PubMed ID: 28865475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. EQ-5D-Y as a Health-Related Quality of Life Instrument for Children and Adolescents: The Instrument's Characteristics, Development, Current Use, and Challenges of Developing Its Value Set.
Kreimeier S; Greiner W
Value Health; 2019 Jan; 22(1):31-37. PubMed ID: 30661631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Developing adolescent-specific health state values for economic evaluation: an application of profile case best-worst scaling to the Child Health Utility 9D.
Ratcliffe J; Flynn T; Terlich F; Stevens K; Brazier J; Sawyer M
Pharmacoeconomics; 2012 Aug; 30(8):713-27. PubMed ID: 22788261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mapping CHU9D Utility Scores from the PedsQL
Mpundu-Kaambwa C; Chen G; Russo R; Stevens K; Petersen KD; Ratcliffe J
Pharmacoeconomics; 2017 Apr; 35(4):453-467. PubMed ID: 27928758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. How Well Do the Generic Multi-attribute Utility Instruments Incorporate Patient and Public Views Into Their Descriptive Systems?
Stevens KJ
Patient; 2016 Feb; 9(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 25663152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An Updated Systematic Review of Studies Mapping (or Cross-Walking) Measures of Health-Related Quality of Life to Generic Preference-Based Measures to Generate Utility Values.
Mukuria C; Rowen D; Harnan S; Rawdin A; Wong R; Ara R; Brazier J
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2019 Jun; 17(3):295-313. PubMed ID: 30945127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
