These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25985962)

  • 1. Authors' response.
    Masani K; Popovic MR
    J Spinal Cord Med; 2015 Jul; 38(4):421. PubMed ID: 25985962
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Letter to the Editor.
    Fitzpatrick S; Taylor J
    J Spinal Cord Med; 2015 Jul; 38(4):420. PubMed ID: 25989984
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Failure of spinal paired associative stimulation to induce neuroplasticity in the human corticospinal tract.
    McGie SC; Masani K; Popovic MR
    J Spinal Cord Med; 2014 Sep; 37(5):565-74. PubMed ID: 25229738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stimulation at the cervicomedullary junction in human subjects.
    Taylor JL
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2006 Jun; 16(3):215-23. PubMed ID: 16125974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Peripheral electrical stimulation triggered by self-paced detection of motor intention enhances motor evoked potentials.
    Niazi IK; Mrachacz-Kersting N; Jiang N; Dremstrup K; Farina D
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2012 Jul; 20(4):595-604. PubMed ID: 22547461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quadro-pulse stimulation is more effective than paired-pulse stimulation for plasticity induction of the human motor cortex.
    Hamada M; Hanajima R; Terao Y; Arai N; Furubayashi T; Inomata-Terada S; Yugeta A; Matsumoto H; Shirota Y; Ugawa Y
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Dec; 118(12):2672-82. PubMed ID: 17977788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Consensus: New methodologies for brain stimulation.
    Huang YZ; Sommer M; Thickbroom G; Hamada M; Pascual-Leonne A; Paulus W; Classen J; Peterchev AV; Zangen A; Ugawa Y
    Brain Stimul; 2009 Jan; 2(1):2-13. PubMed ID: 20633398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. 40 Hz Repetitive auditory stimulation promotes corticospinal plasticity.
    Pinardi M; Schuler AL; Di Pino G; Pellegrino G
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2024 Jun; 162():79-81. PubMed ID: 38583408
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A method to measure the distribution of latencies of motor evoked potentials in man.
    Firmin L; Müller S; Rösler KM
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2011 Jan; 122(1):176-82. PubMed ID: 20630798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Motor evoked potential latency, motor threshold and electric field measurements as indices of transcranial magnetic stimulation depth.
    Roth Y; Pell GS; Zangen A
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Feb; 121(2):255-8; author reply 258-9. PubMed ID: 19815456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reduced motor cortex plasticity following inhibitory rTMS in older adults.
    Todd G; Kimber TE; Ridding MC; Semmler JG
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Mar; 121(3):441-7. PubMed ID: 20071228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation modulates human corticospinal system excitability.
    Bocci T; Marceglia S; Vergari M; Cognetto V; Cogiamanian F; Sartucci F; Priori A
    J Neurophysiol; 2015 Jul; 114(1):440-6. PubMed ID: 25925328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Caveats when studying motor cortex excitability and the cortical control of movement using transcranial magnetic stimulation.
    Burke D; Pierrot-Deseilligny E
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Feb; 121(2):121-3. PubMed ID: 20004614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Isometric contraction interferes with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) induced plasticity: evidence of state-dependent neuromodulation in human motor cortex.
    Thirugnanasambandam N; Sparing R; Dafotakis M; Meister IG; Paulus W; Nitsche MA; Fink GR
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2011; 29(5):311-20. PubMed ID: 21697590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inducing homeostatic-like plasticity in human motor cortex through converging corticocortical inputs.
    Pötter-Nerger M; Fischer S; Mastroeni C; Groppa S; Deuschl G; Volkmann J; Quartarone A; Münchau A; Siebner HR
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 Dec; 102(6):3180-90. PubMed ID: 19726723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of simultaneous contractions of ipsilateral muscles on changes in corticospinal excitability induced by paired associative stimulation (PAS).
    Kennedy NC; Carson RG
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Nov; 445(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 18771706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Factors influencing cortical silent period: optimized stimulus location, intensity and muscle contraction.
    Säisänen L; Pirinen E; Teitti S; Könönen M; Julkunen P; Määttä S; Karhu J
    J Neurosci Methods; 2008 Mar; 169(1):231-8. PubMed ID: 18243329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Transspinal constant-current long-lasting stimulation: a new method to induce cortical and corticospinal plasticity.
    Knikou M; Dixon L; Santora D; Ibrahim MM
    J Neurophysiol; 2015 Sep; 114(3):1486-99. PubMed ID: 26108955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Facilitatory non-invasive brain stimulation in older adults: the effect of stimulation type and duration on the induction of motor cortex plasticity.
    Puri R; Hinder MR; Canty AJ; Summers JJ
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Dec; 234(12):3411-3423. PubMed ID: 27450080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The use of F-response in defining interstimulus intervals appropriate for LTP-like plasticity induction in lower limb spinal paired associative stimulation.
    Shulga A; Lioumis P; Kirveskari E; Savolainen S; Mäkelä JP; Ylinen A
    J Neurosci Methods; 2015 Mar; 242():112-7. PubMed ID: 25597909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.