These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
43. Cost benefit of patch testing with textile finish resins. Andersen KE; Hamann K Contact Dermatitis; 1982 Jan; 8(1):64-7. PubMed ID: 6802569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Patch test results with patients' own perfumes, deodorants and shaving lotions: results of the IVDK 1998-2002. Uter W; Geier J; Schnuch A; Frosch PJ J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2007 Mar; 21(3):374-9. PubMed ID: 17309462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Allergy to glyoxal in a polyvinyl resin emulsion. Hindson C; Lawlor F Contact Dermatitis; 1982 May; 8(3):213. PubMed ID: 6212190 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Allergic contact dermatitis to colophony included in the formulation of flexible collodion BP, the vehicle of a salicylic and lactic acid wart paint. Lachapelle JM; Leroy B Dermatol Clin; 1990 Jan; 8(1):143-6. PubMed ID: 2302853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Dermatitis from X Cupressocyparis leylandii and concomitant sensitivity to colophony. Lovell CR; Dannaker CJ; White IR Contact Dermatitis; 1985 Nov; 13(5):344-5. PubMed ID: 4092459 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Allergic contact dermatitis from a colophony derivative in a tape skin closure. Sjöborg S; Fregert S Contact Dermatitis; 1984 Feb; 10(2):114-5. PubMed ID: 6713836 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Clinical experience and patch testing using colophony (rosin) from different sources. Karlberg AT; Lidén C Br J Dermatol; 1985 Oct; 113(4):475-81. PubMed ID: 4063182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Frequency of textile dye and resin sensitization in patients with contact dermatitis in Israel. Lazarov A; Trattner A; Abraham D; David M Contact Dermatitis; 2002 Feb; 46(2):119-20. PubMed ID: 11918613 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Contact allergy due to colophony. (V). Patch test results with different types of colophony and modified-colophony products. Hausen BM; Mohnert J Contact Dermatitis; 1989 Apr; 20(4):295-301. PubMed ID: 2752740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. [Allergological studies on the sensitizing properties of propolis]. Bogdaszewska-Czabanowska J; Szwarc K; Dembińska B Przegl Dermatol; 1980; 67(6):747-52. PubMed ID: 6454167 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Colophony-induced sensitivity to Juniperus chinensis L. "Hetzii"? Dooms-Goossens A; Maertens M; van Lint L; Ruys-Catlender CM; Scheffer JJ Contact Dermatitis; 1984 Mar; 10(3):185-7. PubMed ID: 6538825 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Contact allergy to acid and neutral fractions of rosins. Sensitization experiments in guinea pigs and patch testing in patients. Karlberg AT; Boman A; Holmbom B; Lidén C Derm Beruf Umwelt; 1986; 34(2):31-6. PubMed ID: 3698833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. [Allergologic studies of intolerance to rosin]. Foussereau J; Schlewer G; Chabeau G; Reimeringer A Derm Beruf Umwelt; 1980; 28(1):14-5. PubMed ID: 7408638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Contact dermatitis due to honeybee royal jelly. Takahashi M; Matsuo I; Ohkido M Contact Dermatitis; 1983 Nov; 9(6):452-5. PubMed ID: 6653102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. [Sensitivity to propolis]. Grzywa Z; Rudzki E Przegl Dermatol; 1979; 66(6):709-11. PubMed ID: 160594 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Inhibitory effect of zinc oxide on contact allergy due to colophony. Söderberg TA; Elmros T; Gref R; Hallmans G Contact Dermatitis; 1990 Nov; 23(5):346-51. PubMed ID: 2096023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]