These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25986812)

  • 1. Re: Retained surgical sponges: findings from incident reports and a cost-benefit analysis of radiofrequency technology.
    Babayan RK
    J Urol; 2015 Jun; 193(6):2019. PubMed ID: 25986812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Retained surgical sponges: findings from incident reports and a cost-benefit analysis of radiofrequency technology.
    Williams TL; Tung DK; Steelman VM; Chang PK; Szekendi MK
    J Am Coll Surg; 2014 Sep; 219(3):354-64. PubMed ID: 25081938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using Radiofrequency Technology to Prevent Retained Sponges and Improve Patient Outcomes.
    Primiano M; Sparks D; Murphy J; Glaser K; McNett M
    AORN J; 2020 Oct; 112(4):345-352. PubMed ID: 32990961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Retained surgical sponges.
    Dieter RA
    J Am Coll Surg; 2013 Mar; 216(3):509. PubMed ID: 23415408
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sensitivity of detection of radiofrequency surgical sponges: a prospective, cross-over study.
    Steelman VM
    Am J Surg; 2011 Feb; 201(2):233-7. PubMed ID: 21266216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of radiofrequency device sensitivity for the detection of retained surgical sponges in patients with morbid obesity.
    Steelman VM; Alasagheirin MH
    Arch Surg; 2012 Oct; 147(10):955-60. PubMed ID: 23070411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Use of Radiofrequency Detection to Mitigate the Risk of Retained Surgical Sponges.
    Bardes JM; Inaba K
    Adv Surg; 2017 Sep; 51(1):219-227. PubMed ID: 28797342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Initial clinical evaluation of a handheld device for detecting retained surgical gauze sponges using radiofrequency identification technology.
    Macario A; Morris D; Morris S
    Arch Surg; 2006 Jul; 141(7):659-62. PubMed ID: 16847236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Role of Radio Frequency Detection System Embedded Surgical Sponges in Preventing Retained Surgical Sponges: A Prospective Evaluation in Patients Undergoing Emergency Surgery.
    Inaba K; Okoye O; Aksoy H; Skiada D; Ault G; Sener S; Lam L; Benjamin E; Demetriades D
    Ann Surg; 2016 Oct; 264(4):599-604. PubMed ID: 27433911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tracking itinerant patients and surgical sponges.
    Korcok M
    CMAJ; 2009 Apr; 180(8):E14-5. PubMed ID: 19364776
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detection of Retained Foreign Objects in Upper Extremity Surgical Procedures With Incisions of Two Centimeters or Smaller.
    Tofte JN; Caldwell LS
    Iowa Orthop J; 2017; 37():189-192. PubMed ID: 28852356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effectiveness of a radiofrequency detection system as an adjunct to manual counting protocols for tracking surgical sponges: a prospective trial of 2,285 patients.
    Rupp CC; Kagarise MJ; Nelson SM; Deal AM; Phillips S; Chadwick J; Petty T; Meyer AA; Kim HJ
    J Am Coll Surg; 2012 Oct; 215(4):524-33. PubMed ID: 22770865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prevention of retained surgical sponges: a decision-analytic model predicting relative cost-effectiveness.
    Regenbogen SE; Greenberg CC; Resch SC; Kollengode A; Cima RR; Zinner MJ; Gawande AA
    Surgery; 2009 May; 145(5):527-35. PubMed ID: 19375612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Hidden Costs of Reconciling Surgical Sponge Counts.
    Steelman VM; Schaapveld AG; Perkhounkova Y; Storm HE; Mathias M
    AORN J; 2015 Nov; 102(5):498-506. PubMed ID: 26514707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radio frequency identification (RFID) applied to surgical sponges.
    Rogers A; Jones E; Oleynikov D
    Surg Endosc; 2007 Jul; 21(7):1235-7. PubMed ID: 17484000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Effect of Radiofrequency Technology on Time Spent Searching for Surgical Sponges and Associated Costs.
    Steelman VM; Schaapveld AG; Storm HE; Perkhounkova Y; Shane DM
    AORN J; 2019 Jun; 109(6):718-727. PubMed ID: 31135978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Surgical sponges in small animal surgery.
    Zeltzman P; Downs M
    Compend Contin Educ Vet; 2011 Jun; 33(6):E5. PubMed ID: 21870350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Radiofrequency-Based Identification Medical Device: An Evaluable Solution for Surgical Sponge Retrieval?
    Lazzaro A; Corona A; Iezzi L; Quaresima S; Armisi L; Piccolo I; Medaglia CM; Sbrenni S; Sileri P; Rosato N; Gaspari AL; Di Lorenzo N
    Surg Innov; 2017 Jun; 24(3):268-275. PubMed ID: 28178883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Radio-frequency surgical sponge detection: a new way to lower the odds of leaving sponges (and similar items) in patients.
    Health Devices; 2008 Jul; 37(7):193-202. PubMed ID: 18771206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of radiofrequency electronic system in intraoperative monitoring of surgical textiles.
    Antonio AM; Vieira CAP
    Einstein (Sao Paulo); 2018; 16(1):eAO3997. PubMed ID: 29694622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.