165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25987516)
1. Many replications do not causal inferences make: the need for critical replications to test competing explanations of nonrandomized studies.
Larzelere RE; Cox RB; Swindle TM
Perspect Psychol Sci; 2015 May; 10(3):380-9. PubMed ID: 25987516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The intervention selection bias: an underrecognized confound in intervention research.
Larzelere RE; Kuhn BR; Johnson B
Psychol Bull; 2004 Mar; 130(2):289-303. PubMed ID: 14979773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Nonrandomized quality improvement intervention trials might overstate the strength of causal inference of their findings.
Li LC; Moja L; Romero A; Sayre EC; Grimshaw JM
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Sep; 62(9):959-66. PubMed ID: 19211223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rewarding Replications: A Sure and Simple Way to Improve Psychological Science.
Koole SL; Lakens D
Perspect Psychol Sci; 2012 Nov; 7(6):608-14. PubMed ID: 26168120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The compliance score as a regressor in randomized trials.
Joffe MM; Ten Have TR; Brensinger C
Biostatistics; 2003 Jul; 4(3):327-40. PubMed ID: 12925501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. On the causal structure of information bias and confounding bias in randomized trials.
Shahar E; Shahar DJ
J Eval Clin Pract; 2009 Dec; 15(6):1214-6. PubMed ID: 20367730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improving Causal Inferences in Meta-analyses of Longitudinal Studies: Spanking as an Illustration.
Larzelere RE; Gunnoe ML; Ferguson CJ
Child Dev; 2018 Nov; 89(6):2038-2050. PubMed ID: 29797703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Replications in Psychology Research: How Often Do They Really Occur?
Makel MC; Plucker JA; Hegarty B
Perspect Psychol Sci; 2012 Nov; 7(6):537-42. PubMed ID: 26168110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimating causal effects from multiple-baseline studies: implications for design and analysis.
Ferron JM; Moeyaert M; Van den Noortgate W; Beretvas SN
Psychol Methods; 2014 Dec; 19(4):493-510. PubMed ID: 24933294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Replication initiatives will not salvage the trustworthiness of psychology.
Coyne JC
BMC Psychol; 2016 May; 4(1):28. PubMed ID: 27245324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A general, multivariate definition of causal effects in epidemiology.
Flanders WD; Klein M
Epidemiology; 2015 Jul; 26(4):481-9. PubMed ID: 25946227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Campbell's and Rubin's perspectives on causal inference.
West SG; Thoemmes F
Psychol Methods; 2010 Mar; 15(1):18-37. PubMed ID: 20230100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bias analysis of the instrumental variable estimator as an estimator of the average causal effect.
Chiba Y
Contemp Clin Trials; 2010 Jan; 31(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 19879376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bias and causal associations in observational research.
Grimes DA; Schulz KF
Lancet; 2002 Jan; 359(9302):248-52. PubMed ID: 11812579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Campbell and Rubin: A primer and comparison of their approaches to causal inference in field settings.
Shadish WR
Psychol Methods; 2010 Mar; 15(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 20230099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Registered reports and replications: An ongoing Journal of School Psychology initiative.
Braden JP
J Sch Psychol; 2024 Apr; 103():101294. PubMed ID: 38432736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. When averaging goes wrong: The case for mixture model estimation in psychological science.
Moreau D; Corballis MC
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Sep; 148(9):1615-1627. PubMed ID: 30489120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Internal conceptual replications do not increase independent replication success.
Kunert R
Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Oct; 23(5):1631-1638. PubMed ID: 27068542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. What random assignment does and does not do.
Krause MS; Howard KI
J Clin Psychol; 2003 Jul; 59(7):751-66. PubMed ID: 12808582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Systematic reviews incorporating evidence from nonrandomized study designs: reasons for caution when estimating health effects.
Reeves BC; van Binsbergen J; van Weel C
Eur J Clin Nutr; 2005 Aug; 59 Suppl 1():S155-61. PubMed ID: 16052184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
