239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25988841)
1. Application of high-dimensional feature selection: evaluation for genomic prediction in man.
Bermingham ML; Pong-Wong R; Spiliopoulou A; Hayward C; Rudan I; Campbell H; Wright AF; Wilson JF; Agakov F; Navarro P; Haley CS
Sci Rep; 2015 May; 5():10312. PubMed ID: 25988841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Genomic prediction of breeding values using previously estimated SNP variances.
Calus MP; Schrooten C; Veerkamp RF
Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Sep; 46(1):52. PubMed ID: 25928875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Simultaneous fitting of genomic-BLUP and Bayes-C components in a genomic prediction model.
Iheshiulor OOM; Woolliams JA; Svendsen M; Solberg T; Meuwissen THE
Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Aug; 49(1):63. PubMed ID: 28836944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance of Bayesian and BLUP alphabets for genomic prediction: analysis, comparison and results.
Meher PK; Rustgi S; Kumar A
Heredity (Edinb); 2022 Jun; 128(6):519-530. PubMed ID: 35508540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of five methods to predict genomic breeding values of dairy bulls from genome-wide SNP markers.
Moser G; Tier B; Crump RE; Khatkar MS; Raadsma HW
Genet Sel Evol; 2009 Dec; 41(1):56. PubMed ID: 20043835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Using markers with large effect in genetic and genomic predictions.
Lopes MS; Bovenhuis H; van Son M; Nordbø Ø; Grindflek EH; Knol EF; Bastiaansen JW
J Anim Sci; 2017 Jan; 95(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 28177367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantitative trait loci markers derived from whole genome sequence data increases the reliability of genomic prediction.
Brøndum RF; Su G; Janss L; Sahana G; Guldbrandtsen B; Boichard D; Lund MS
J Dairy Sci; 2015 Jun; 98(6):4107-16. PubMed ID: 25892697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of whole-genome prediction using a genetic architecture-enhanced variance-covariance matrix.
Zhang Z; Erbe M; He J; Ober U; Gao N; Zhang H; Simianer H; Li J
G3 (Bethesda); 2015 Feb; 5(4):615-27. PubMed ID: 25670771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Different models of genetic variation and their effect on genomic evaluation.
Clark SA; Hickey JM; van der Werf JH
Genet Sel Evol; 2011 May; 43(1):18. PubMed ID: 21575265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Genomic predictions can accelerate selection for resistance against Piscirickettsia salmonis in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar).
Bangera R; Correa K; Lhorente JP; Figueroa R; Yáñez JM
BMC Genomics; 2017 Jan; 18(1):121. PubMed ID: 28143402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Multiple-Trait Bayesian Lasso for Genome-Enabled Analysis and Prediction of Complex Traits.
Gianola D; Fernando RL
Genetics; 2020 Feb; 214(2):305-331. PubMed ID: 31879318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Application of Bayesian least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and BayesCπ methods for genomic selection in French Holstein and Montbéliarde breeds.
Colombani C; Legarra A; Fritz S; Guillaume F; Croiseau P; Ducrocq V; Robert-Granié C
J Dairy Sci; 2013 Jan; 96(1):575-91. PubMed ID: 23127905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of genomic selection methods in a standard data set of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.).
Resende MF; Muñoz P; Resende MD; Garrick DJ; Fernando RL; Davis JM; Jokela EJ; Martin TA; Peter GF; Kirst M
Genetics; 2012 Apr; 190(4):1503-10. PubMed ID: 22271763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of prediction of simulated polygenic phenotypes and their underlying quantitative trait loci genotypes using real or imputed whole-genome markers in cattle.
Hassani S; Saatchi M; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Dec; 47():99. PubMed ID: 26698091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Genetic prediction of quantitative lipid traits: comparing shrinkage models to gene scores.
Warren H; Casas JP; Hingorani A; Dudbridge F; Whittaker J
Genet Epidemiol; 2014 Jan; 38(1):72-83. PubMed ID: 24272946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Impact of Genomic and Traditional Selection on the Contribution of Mutational Variance to Long-Term Selection Response and Genetic Variance.
Mulder HA; Lee SH; Clark S; Hayes BJ; van der Werf JHJ
Genetics; 2019 Oct; 213(2):361-378. PubMed ID: 31431471
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of prior specifications in a shrinkage-inducing Bayesian model for quantitative trait mapping and genomic prediction.
Knürr T; Läärä E; Sillanpää MJ
Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Jul; 45(1):24. PubMed ID: 23834140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Genomic prediction of complex human traits: relatedness, trait architecture and predictive meta-models.
Spiliopoulou A; Nagy R; Bermingham ML; Huffman JE; Hayward C; Vitart V; Rudan I; Campbell H; Wright AF; Wilson JF; Pong-Wong R; Agakov F; Navarro P; Haley CS
Hum Mol Genet; 2015 Jul; 24(14):4167-82. PubMed ID: 25918167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Relative Power of Structural Genomic Variation versus SNPs in Explaining the Quantitative Trait Growth in the Marine Teleost
Ruigrok M; Xue B; Catanach A; Zhang M; Jesson L; Davy M; Wellenreuther M
Genes (Basel); 2022 Jun; 13(7):. PubMed ID: 35885912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of genomic prediction using low-density marker panels.
Zhang Z; Ding X; Liu J; Zhang Q; de Koning DJ
J Dairy Sci; 2011 Jul; 94(7):3642-50. PubMed ID: 21700054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
