BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

349 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25989411)

  • 1. Costs and inconsistencies in US IRB review of low-risk medical education research.
    Kano M; Getrich CM; Romney C; Sussman AL; Williams RL
    Med Educ; 2015 Jun; 49(6):634-7. PubMed ID: 25989411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology
    J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2377-86. PubMed ID: 12721281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Medical education research and IRB review: an analysis and comparison of the IRB review process at six institutions.
    Dyrbye LN; Thomas MR; Mechaber AJ; Eacker A; Harper W; Massie FS; Power DV; Shanafelt TD
    Acad Med; 2007 Jul; 82(7):654-60. PubMed ID: 17595560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ethical standards for medical research in the Israeli military - review of the changes in the last decade.
    Hassidim A; Kayouf R; Yavnai N; Panush N; Dagan D; Bader T; Hartal M
    Isr J Health Policy Res; 2016; 5():53. PubMed ID: 27980720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perspectives of Singaporean biomedical researchers and research support staff on actual and ideal IRB review functions and characteristics: A quantitative analysis.
    Labude MK; Shen L; Zhu Y; Schaefer GO; Ong C; Xafis V
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0241783. PubMed ID: 33382683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Impact of Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) on Clinical Innovation: A Survey of Investigators and IRB Members.
    Stryjewski TP; Kalish BT; Silverman B; Lehmann LS
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2015 Dec; 10(5):481-7. PubMed ID: 26564945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Operational Characteristics of Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) in the United States.
    Nesom GL; Petrof I; Moore TM
    AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2019; 10(4):276-286. PubMed ID: 31618119
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Economies of scale in institutional review boards.
    Wagner TH; Cruz AM; Chadwick GL
    Med Care; 2004 Aug; 42(8):817-23. PubMed ID: 15258484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Variation in institutional review board responses to a standard, observational, pediatric research protocol.
    Mansbach J; Acholonu U; Clark S; Camargo CA
    Acad Emerg Med; 2007 Apr; 14(4):377-80. PubMed ID: 17312334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is your ethics committee efficient? Using "IRB Metrics" as a self-assessment tool for continuous improvement at the Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Thailand.
    Adams P; Kaewkungwal J; Limphattharacharoen C; Prakobtham S; Pengsaa K; Khusmith S
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e113356. PubMed ID: 25406085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Should society allow research ethics boards to be run as for-profit enterprises?
    Emanuel EJ; Lemmens T; Elliot C
    PLoS Med; 2006 Jul; 3(7):e309. PubMed ID: 16848618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Working with the institutional review board.
    Byerly WG
    Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2009 Jan; 66(2):176-84. PubMed ID: 19139484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transitioning to the National Institutes of Health single institutional review board model: Piloting the use of the Streamlined, Multi-site, Accelerated Resources for Trials IRB Reliance.
    Vardeny O; Hernandez AF; Cohen LW; Franklin A; Baqai M; Palmer S; Bierer BE; Cobb N
    Clin Trials; 2019 Jun; 16(3):290-296. PubMed ID: 30866676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Problematic variation in local institutional review of a multicenter genetic epidemiology study.
    McWilliams R; Hoover-Fong J; Hamosh A; Beck S; Beaty T; Cutting G
    JAMA; 2003 Jul; 290(3):360-6. PubMed ID: 12865377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Understanding institutional review boards: practical guidance to the IRB review process.
    Pech C; Cob N; Cejka JT
    Nutr Clin Pract; 2007 Dec; 22(6):618-28. PubMed ID: 18042949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Review of multicenter studies by multiple institutional review boards: characteristics and outcomes for perinatal studies implemented by a multicenter network.
    Abramovici A; Salazar A; Edvalson T; Gallagher N; Dorman K; Tita A;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jan; 212(1):110.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25088862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Institutional Review Boards: What Clinician Researchers Need to Know.
    Lapid MI; Clarke BL; Wright RS
    Mayo Clin Proc; 2019 Mar; 94(3):515-525. PubMed ID: 30832791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Investigators' successful strategies for working with Institutional Review Boards.
    Cartwright JC; Hickman SE; Nelson CA; Knafl KA
    Res Nurs Health; 2013 Oct; 36(5):478-86. PubMed ID: 23813748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. IRB Problems and Solutions in Health Communication Research.
    King CST; Bivens KM; Pumroy E; Rauch S; Koerber A
    Health Commun; 2018 Jul; 33(7):907-916. PubMed ID: 28586270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Burdens on research imposed by institutional review boards: the state of the evidence and its implications for regulatory reform.
    Silberman G; Kahn KL
    Milbank Q; 2011 Dec; 89(4):599-627. PubMed ID: 22188349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.