BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25990089)

  • 1. Liver sharing and organ procurement organization performance under redistricted allocation.
    Gentry SE; Chow EK; Massie A; Luo X; Shteyn E; Pyke J; Zaun D; Snyder JJ; Israni AK; Kasiske B; Segev DL
    Liver Transpl; 2015 Aug; 21(8):1031-9. PubMed ID: 25990089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Liver sharing and organ procurement organization performance.
    Gentry SE; Chow EK; Massie A; Luo X; Zaun D; Snyder JJ; Israni AK; Kasiske B; Segev DL
    Liver Transpl; 2015 Mar; 21(3):293-9. PubMed ID: 25556648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improving Liver Allocation Using Optimized Neighborhoods.
    Kilambi V; Mehrotra S
    Transplantation; 2017 Feb; 101(2):350-359. PubMed ID: 27906775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Addressing geographic disparities in liver transplantation through redistricting.
    Gentry SE; Massie AB; Cheek SW; Lentine KL; Chow EH; Wickliffe CE; Dzebashvili N; Salvalaggio PR; Schnitzler MA; Axelrod DA; Segev DL
    Am J Transplant; 2013 Aug; 13(8):2052-8. PubMed ID: 23837931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Population-Based Analysis and Projections of Liver Supply Under Redistricting.
    Parikh ND; Marrero WJ; Sonnenday CJ; Lok AS; Hutton DW; Lavieri MS
    Transplantation; 2017 Sep; 101(9):2048-2055. PubMed ID: 28945663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. MELD scores of liver transplant recipients according to size of waiting list: impact of organ allocation and patient outcomes.
    Trotter JF; Osgood MJ
    JAMA; 2004 Apr; 291(15):1871-4. PubMed ID: 15100206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of National Organ Donation Rates and Organ Procurement Organization Metrics.
    DeRoos LJ; Zhou Y; Marrero WJ; Tapper EB; Sonnenday CJ; Lavieri MS; Hutton DW; Parikh ND
    JAMA Surg; 2021 Feb; 156(2):173-180. PubMed ID: 33263743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Patterns of geographic variability in mortality and eligible deaths between organ procurement organizations.
    Cannon RM; Jones CM; Davis EG; Franklin GA; Gupta M; Shah MB
    Am J Transplant; 2019 Oct; 19(10):2756-2763. PubMed ID: 30980456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Liver allocation and distribution: time for a change.
    Deshpande R; Hirose R; Mulligan D
    Curr Opin Organ Transplant; 2017 Apr; 22(2):162-168. PubMed ID: 28212159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development of the allocation system for deceased donor liver transplantation.
    Coombes JM; Trotter JF
    Clin Med Res; 2005 May; 3(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 16012126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rapid improvement in organ procurement organization performance: Potential for change and impact of new leadership.
    Niroomand E; Mantero A; Narasimman M; Delgado C; Goldberg D
    Am J Transplant; 2020 Dec; 20(12):3567-3573. PubMed ID: 32476235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Impact of Redistricting Proposals on Health Care Expenditures for Liver Transplant Candidates and Recipients.
    Gentry SE; Chow EK; Dzebisashvili N; Schnitzler MA; Lentine KL; Wickliffe CE; Shteyn E; Pyke J; Israni A; Kasiske B; Segev DL; Axelrod DA
    Am J Transplant; 2016 Feb; 16(2):583-93. PubMed ID: 26779694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Geographic disparities in liver supply/demand ratio within fixed-distance and fixed-population circles.
    Haugen CE; Ishaque T; Sapirstein A; Cauneac A; Segev DL; Gentry S
    Am J Transplant; 2019 Jul; 19(7):2044-2052. PubMed ID: 30748095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using a standardized donor ratio to assess the performance of organ procurement organizations.
    Stogis S; Hirth RA; Strawderman RL; Banaszak-Holl J; Smith DG
    Health Serv Res; 2002 Oct; 37(5):1329-44. PubMed ID: 12479499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Examining utilization of kidneys as a function of procurement performance.
    Doby BL; Ross-Driscoll K; Yu S; Godwin M; Lee KJ; Lynch RJ
    Am J Transplant; 2022 Jun; 22(6):1614-1623. PubMed ID: 35118830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Procurement characteristics of high- and low-performing OPOs as seen in OPTN/SRTR data.
    Lynch RJ; Doby BL; Goldberg DS; Lee KJ; Cimeno A; Karp SJ
    Am J Transplant; 2022 Feb; 22(2):455-463. PubMed ID: 34510735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Liver Simulated Allocation Modeling: Were the Predictions Accurate for Share 35?
    Goel A; Kim WR; Pyke J; Schladt DP; Kasiske BL; Snyder JJ; Lake JR; Israni AK
    Transplantation; 2018 May; 102(5):769-774. PubMed ID: 29309379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Liver redistricting: what are the upcoming changes in liver allocation in the United States?
    Bittermann T; Goldberg DS
    Curr Opin Organ Transplant; 2017 Apr; 22(2):112-117. PubMed ID: 27926547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Organ procurement organization (OPO), best practices.
    Bollinger RR; Heinrichs DR; Seem DL; Rosendale JD; Johnson KS;
    Clin Transplant; 2001; 15 Suppl 6():16-21. PubMed ID: 11903381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Advances in liver transplantation allocation systems.
    Schilsky ML; Moini M
    World J Gastroenterol; 2016 Mar; 22(10):2922-30. PubMed ID: 26973389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.