These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25990658)

  • 21. Neural Correlates of Word Recognition: A Systematic Comparison of Natural Reading and Rapid Serial Visual Presentation.
    Kornrumpf B; Niefind F; Sommer W; Dimigen O
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Sep; 28(9):1374-91. PubMed ID: 27167402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Ad-hoc and context-dependent adjustments of selective attention in conflict control: an ERP study with visual probes.
    Nigbur R; Schneider J; Sommer W; Dimigen O; Stürmer B
    Neuroimage; 2015 Feb; 107():76-84. PubMed ID: 25482266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evidence for the auditory P3a reflecting an automatic process: elicitation during highly-focused continuous visual attention.
    Muller-Gass A; Macdonald M; Schröger E; Sculthorpe L; Campbell K
    Brain Res; 2007 Sep; 1170():71-8. PubMed ID: 17692834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Visually complex foveal words increase the amount of parafoveal information acquired.
    Yan M
    Vision Res; 2015 Jun; 111(Pt A):91-6. PubMed ID: 25911574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Activation in left primary visual cortex representing parafoveal visual field during reading Japanese texts.
    Shimada Y; Hirayama K; Nakadomari S; Furuta A; Misaki M; Kan S; Koike T; Miyauchi S; Mori E
    Brain Res; 2011 Aug; 1408():72-80. PubMed ID: 21777908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Parafoveal-on-foveal effects on eye movements in text reading: does an extra space make a difference?
    Drieghe D; Brysbaert M; Desmet T
    Vision Res; 2005 Jun; 45(13):1693-706. PubMed ID: 15792844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evidence for delayed parafoveal-on-foveal effects from word n+2 in reading.
    Risse S; Kliegl R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Aug; 38(4):1026-42. PubMed ID: 22428669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Naming fluency in dyslexic and nondyslexic readers: differential effects of visual crowding in foveal, parafoveal, and peripheral vision.
    Moll K; Jones M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(11):2085-91. PubMed ID: 24161215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Parafoveal-on-foveal and foveal word priming are different processes: behavioral and neurophysiological evidence.
    Pernet C; Uusvuori J; Salmelin R
    Neuroimage; 2007 Nov; 38(2):321-30. PubMed ID: 17851091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The Fixation Distance to the Stimulus Influences ERP Quality: An EEG and Eye Tracking N400 Study.
    Domínguez-Martínez E; Parise E; Strandvall T; Reid VM
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0134339. PubMed ID: 26222059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Task-dependent modulation of word processing mechanisms during modified visual search tasks.
    Dampure J; Benraiss A; Vibert N
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(6):1145-63. PubMed ID: 26176489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Lateralization of posterior alpha EEG reflects the distribution of spatial attention during saccadic reading.
    Kornrumpf B; Dimigen O; Sommer W
    Psychophysiology; 2017 Jun; 54(6):809-823. PubMed ID: 28240816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Frequency and predictability effects in the Dundee Corpus: an eye movement analysis.
    Kennedy A; Pynte J; Murray WS; Paul SA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):601-18. PubMed ID: 22643118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Attentional load affects automatic emotional processing: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Doallo S; Holguín SR; Cadaveira F
    Neuroreport; 2006 Nov; 17(17):1797-801. PubMed ID: 17164667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Inattentional amnesia to words in a high attentional load task.
    Ruz M; Worden MS; Tudela P; McCandliss BD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 May; 17(5):768-76. PubMed ID: 15904543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. N250r and N400 ERP correlates of immediate famous face repetition are independent of perceptual load.
    Neumann MF; Schweinberger SR
    Brain Res; 2008 Nov; 1239():181-90. PubMed ID: 18793621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Rapid categorization of foveal and extrafoveal natural images: associated ERPs and effects of lateralization.
    Fize D; Fabre-Thorpe M; Richard G; Doyon B; Thorpe SJ
    Brain Cogn; 2005 Nov; 59(2):145-58. PubMed ID: 16098651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Perceptual load and visuocortical processing: event-related potentials reveal sensory-level selection.
    Handy TC; Soltani M; Mangun GR
    Psychol Sci; 2001 May; 12(3):213-8. PubMed ID: 11437303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Emotional facilitation effect in the picture-word interference task: an ERP study.
    Liu B; Xin S; Jin Z; Hu Y; Li Y
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Mar; 72(2):289-99. PubMed ID: 19853986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. When and where perceptual load interacts with voluntary visuospatial attention: an event-related potential and dipole modeling study.
    Fu S; Zinni M; Squire PN; Kumar R; Caggiano DM; Parasuraman R
    Neuroimage; 2008 Feb; 39(3):1345-55. PubMed ID: 18006335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.