728 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25991010)
1. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: Comparison of long-term outcomes.
Ariyaratnam P; Loubani M; Griffin SC
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann; 2015 Sep; 23(7):814-21. PubMed ID: 25991010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimally invasive and conventional aortic valve replacement: a propensity score analysis.
Gilmanov D; Bevilacqua S; Murzi M; Cerillo AG; Gasbarri T; Kallushi E; Miceli A; Glauber M
Ann Thorac Surg; 2013 Sep; 96(3):837-43. PubMed ID: 23866805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Full sternotomy versus right anterior minithoracotomy for isolated aortic valve replacement in octogenarians: a propensity-matched study †.
Gilmanov D; Farneti PA; Ferrarini M; Santarelli F; Murzi M; Miceli A; Solinas M; Glauber M
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2015 Jun; 20(6):732-41; discussion 741. PubMed ID: 25757476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Minimally invasive versus transapical versus transfemoral aortic valve implantation: A one-to-one-to-one propensity score-matched analysis.
Furukawa N; Kuss O; Emmel E; Scholtz S; Scholtz W; Fujita B; Ensminger S; Gummert JF; Börgermann J
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018 Nov; 156(5):1825-1834. PubMed ID: 29861110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Long-term outcomes following minimal invasive versus conventional aortic valve replacement: a propensity match analysis.
Gasparovic I; Artemiou P; Hudec V; Hulman M
Bratisl Lek Listy; 2017; 118(8):479-484. PubMed ID: 29050486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does a minimally invasive approach increase the incidence of patient-prosthesis mismatch in aortic valve replacement?
Bakir I; Casselman FP; Onan B; Van Praet F; Vermeulen Y; Degrieck I
J Heart Valve Dis; 2014 Mar; 23(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 25076545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Minimally invasive aortic valve surgery. A safe and useful technique beyond the cosmetic benefits.
Paredes FA; Cánovas SJ; Gil O; García-Fuster R; Hornero F; Vázquez A; Martín E; Mena A; Martínez-León J
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed); 2013 Sep; 66(9):695-9. PubMed ID: 24773674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Limited versus full sternotomy for aortic valve replacement.
Kirmani BH; Jones SG; Malaisrie SC; Chung DA; Williams RJ
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Apr; 4(4):CD011793. PubMed ID: 28394022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mini-aortic surgery with percutaneous cannulation and rapid-deployment valve.
Bruno P; Farina P; Cammertoni F; Biondi R; Perri G; Di Cesare A; Crea F; Massetti M
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann; 2016 Jul; 24(6):535-40. PubMed ID: 27286783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Benefits of rapid deployment aortic valve replacement with a mini upper sternotomy.
Chien S; Clark C; Maheshwari S; Koutsogiannidis CP; Zamvar V; Giordano V; Lim K; Pessotto R
J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Aug; 15(1):226. PubMed ID: 32847577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of minimally invasive and standard aortic valve replacement.
Stoliński J; Plicner D; Grudzień G; Wąsowicz M; Musiał R; Andres J; Kapelak B
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2016 Oct; 152(4):1030-9. PubMed ID: 27449562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Aortic valve replacement through full sternotomy with a stented bioprosthesis versus minimally invasive sternotomy with a sutureless bioprosthesis.
Dalén M; Biancari F; Rubino AS; Santarpino G; Glaser N; De Praetere H; Kasama K; Juvonen T; Deste W; Pollari F; Meuris B; Fischlein T; Mignosa C; Gatti G; Pappalardo A; Svenarud P; Sartipy U
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Jan; 49(1):220-7. PubMed ID: 25653252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement in octogenarians performed via a right anterior thoracotomy approach.
Krishna RK; Santana O; Mihos CG; Pineda AM; Weiss UK; Lamelas J
J Heart Valve Dis; 2014 Nov; 23(6):671-4. PubMed ID: 25790612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reoperative aortic valve replacement in the octogenarians-minimally invasive technique in the era of transcatheter valve replacement.
Kaneko T; Loberman D; Gosev I; Rassam F; McGurk S; Leacche M; Cohn L
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Jan; 147(1):155-62. PubMed ID: 24183906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Traditional Sternotomy Versus Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients Stratified by Ejection Fraction.
Nguyen TC; Thourani VH; Pham JQ; Zhao Y; Terwelp MD; Balan P; Ocazionez D; Loghin C; Smalling RW; Estrera AL; Lamelas J
Innovations (Phila); 2017; 12(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 28099179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Surgical results of aortic valve replacement via partial upper sternotomy: comparison with median sternotomy.
Masiello P; Coscioni E; Panza A; Triumbari F; Preziosi G; Di Benedetto G
Cardiovasc Surg; 2002 Aug; 10(4):333-8. PubMed ID: 12359403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Right anterior minithoracotomy for aortic valve replacement: 10-year experience of a single center.
Glauber M; Gilmanov D; Farneti PA; Kallushi E; Miceli A; Chiaramonti F; Murzi M; Solinas M
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Sep; 150(3):548-56.e2. PubMed ID: 26215359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Propensity score-matched analysis of minimally invasive aortic valve replacement.
Hiraoka A; Totsugawa T; Kuinose M; Nakajima K; Chikazawa G; Tamura K; Yoshitaka H; Sakaguchi T
Circ J; 2014; 78(12):2876-81. PubMed ID: 25421231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Efficacy of sutureless aortic valves in minimally invasive cardiac surgery: an evolution of the surgical technique.
Pfeiffer S; Dell'aquila AM; Vogt F; Kalisnik JM; Sirch J; Fischlein T; Santarpino G
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2017 Oct; 58(5):731-738. PubMed ID: 27385418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Minimally Invasive Aortic Root Replacement with Valved Conduits through Partial Upper Sternotomy.
Hillebrand J; Alshakaki M; Martens S; Scherer M
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018 Jun; 66(4):295-300. PubMed ID: 28201842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
