These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25991226)

  • 21. Mobile Health Application and e-Health Literacy: Opportunities and Concerns for Cancer Patients and Caregivers.
    Kim H; Goldsmith JV; Sengupta S; Mahmood A; Powell MP; Bhatt J; Chang CF; Bhuyan SS
    J Cancer Educ; 2019 Feb; 34(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 29139070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The development of an application for data privacy by applying an audit repository based on IHE ATNA.
    Bresser L; Köhler S; Schwaab C
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2014; 198():219-25. PubMed ID: 24825706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Interoperability design of personal health information import service.
    Tuomainen M; Mykkänen J
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2012; 180():462-6. PubMed ID: 22874233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Mobile Clinical Decision Support Systems in Our Hands - Great Potential but also a Concern.
    Masic I; Begic E
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2016; 226():63-6. PubMed ID: 27350467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Metadata requirements for portals.
    Benson T
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 210():577-81. PubMed ID: 25991214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Assessment method for mobile health applications in Spanish: The iSYScore index].
    Grau I; Kostov B; Gallego JA; Grajales Iii F; Fernández-Luque L; Sisó-Almirall A
    Semergen; 2016; 42(8):575-583. PubMed ID: 26879598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Requirements for CE-marking of apps and wearables].
    Berensmann M; Gratzfeld M
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2018 Mar; 61(3):314-320. PubMed ID: 29368120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Qualitative evaluation of mobile cancer apps with particular attention to the target group, content, and advertising.
    Böhme C; von Osthoff MB; Frey K; Hübner J
    J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2018 Jan; 144(1):173-181. PubMed ID: 29052039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Matching study to registry data: maintaining data privacy in a study on family based colorectal cancer.
    Nasseh D; Engel J; Mansmann U; Tretter W; Stausberg J
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2014; 205():808-12. PubMed ID: 25160299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A semiotic view on paper and mobile care data quality.
    De La Harpe R
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2012; 180():442-6. PubMed ID: 22874229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Future trend medical apps. From the apps store directly into medical practice?].
    Gehring H; Pramann O; Imhoff M; Albrecht UV
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2014 Dec; 57(12):1402-10. PubMed ID: 25388438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. User-Centered Design Practices to Redesign a Nursing e-Chart in Line with the Nursing Process.
    Schachner MB; Recondo FJ; González ZA; Sommer JA; Stanziola E; Gassino FD; Simón M; López GE; Benítez SE
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2016; 225():93-7. PubMed ID: 27332169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Mobile medical apps for patient education: a graded review of available dermatology apps.
    Masud A; Shafi S; Rao BK
    Cutis; 2018 Feb; 101(2):141-144. PubMed ID: 29554157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A cloud-based X73 ubiquitous mobile healthcare system: design and implementation.
    Ji Z; Ganchev I; O'Droma M; Zhang X; Zhang X
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2014; 2014():145803. PubMed ID: 24737958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Design, implementation and validation of a novel open framework for agile development of mobile health applications.
    Banos O; Villalonga C; Garcia R; Saez A; Damas M; Holgado-Terriza JA; Lee S; Pomares H; Rojas I
    Biomed Eng Online; 2015; 14 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S6. PubMed ID: 26329639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Electronic patient records and teleophthalmology : part 1: introduction to the various systems and standards].
    Schargus M; Michelson G; Grehn F
    Ophthalmologe; 2011 May; 108(5):473-84. PubMed ID: 21590353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Beyond the DICOM header: additional issues in deidentification.
    Robinson JD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Dec; 203(6):W658-64. PubMed ID: 25415732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Method to integrate clinical guidelines into the electronic health record (EHR) by applying the archetypes approach.
    Garcia D; Moro CM; Cicogna PE; Carvalho DR
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 192():871-5. PubMed ID: 23920682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Developing and implementing an interoperable document-based electronic health record.
    Campos F; Plazzotta F; Luna D; Baum A; de Quirós FG
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 192():1169. PubMed ID: 23920943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Preliminary comparison of mHealth architectures based on MU2 criteria.
    Song JH; Kim IK; Yi BK
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 192():1127. PubMed ID: 23920901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.