These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2599233)
21. Exposure factors and screen-film combinations in temporomandibular joint radiography. Thorburn DN; Stockdill DA; Kenyon RP; Cowan I; Ferguson MM Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1991 May; 20(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 1936423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A clinical comparison of image quality and patient exposure reduction in panoramic radiography with heavy metal filtration. Kapa SF; Tyndall DA Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Jun; 67(6):750-9. PubMed ID: 2740096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of films processed in automatic and manual processors. Thunthy KH; Weinberg R Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1980 Nov; 50(5):479-83. PubMed ID: 6935603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A comparison of Flow and Kodak dental X-ray films by means of perceptibility curves. Svenson B; Petersson A Acta Odontol Scand; 1993 Apr; 51(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 8498162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evaluation of radiographs developed by a new ultrarapid film processing system. Schmidt RA; Doi K; Sekiya M; Xu XW; Giger ML; Lu CT; Mojtahedi S; MacMahon H AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1990 May; 154(5):1107-10. PubMed ID: 2108553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparative means of dose reduction in dental radiography. Rohlin M; White SC Curr Opin Dent; 1992 Jun; 2():1-9. PubMed ID: 1520917 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Technique charts for Kodak EC-L film screen system for portal localization in a 6MV X-ray beam. Sandilos P; Antypas C; Paraskevopoulou C; Kouvaris J; Vlachos L Technol Health Care; 2006; 14(6):467-72. PubMed ID: 17148858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Advantages of a 400 speed image receptor system for cast radiography. Gratale P; Burns CB; Murray J Radiol Technol; 1987; 58(5):401-3. PubMed ID: 3588882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A comparative physical evaluation of four X-ray films. Egyed M; Shearer DR Radiol Manage; 1981 Sep; 3(4):11-20. PubMed ID: 10253292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Image resolution in the midsagittal plane of the Orthopantomograph-10 using Lanex regular and T-Mat G screen-film combination. Chen SK; Hollender L Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1992 Oct; 74(4):524-30. PubMed ID: 1408031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Reduction of radiation dosage by the use of newer reinforced rare earth films]. Hofmann T Inf Orthod Kieferorthop; 1987; 19(1):107-10. PubMed ID: 3474210 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Evaluation of a new type of high sharpness film for skull radiography. Honda E; Yoshino N; Chiba R; Sasaki T Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1991 May; 20(2):59-64. PubMed ID: 1936417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. High-yield radiography of the maxillofacial complex using the free focus and conventional imaging concepts. The resolution performance of nonscreen and screen-film combinations. Jensen TW; Goldberg AJ; Randall GJ Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1983 Sep; 56(3):324-31. PubMed ID: 6579466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Psychophysical properties of a new F-speed intraoral film. Mastoris M; Yoshiura K; Welander U; Tsiklakis K; Papadakis E; Li G Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 May; 33(3):158-63. PubMed ID: 15371315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of two detail screen-film systems using a rheumatoid erosion model. De Smet AA; Goin JE; Arnett GR; Chang CH; Martin NL; Rosenthal SJ Invest Radiol; 1983; 18(4):359-63. PubMed ID: 6618826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A comparison of 18 different x-ray detectors currently used in dentistry. Farman AG; Farman TT Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Apr; 99(4):485-9. PubMed ID: 15772598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Evaluation of rare earth intensifying screens in cephalometric radiography. Stathopoulos V; Poulton DR Angle Orthod; 1990; 60(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 2180348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The influence of film-screen color sensitivity and type of measurement device on kVp measurements. Lam RW; Price SC Radiol Technol; 1989; 60(4):319-21. PubMed ID: 2928498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Evaluation of several film/screen combinations for megavoltage radiation therapy treatment field verification. Das IJ; McCullough EC; Weber F Med Dosim; 1988; 13(2):95-7. PubMed ID: 3150812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]