These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2599233)

  • 41. Evaluation of a new F speed dental X-ray film. The effect of processing solutions and a comparison with D and E speed films.
    Farman TT; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 10654035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Characterization of new portal film systems for radiotherapy verification.
    Langmack KA; Goss V
    Br J Radiol; 1999 May; 72(857):479-84. PubMed ID: 10505013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Threshold perception performance with computed and screen-film radiography: implications for chest radiography.
    Dobbins JT; Rice JJ; Beam CA; Ravin CE
    Radiology; 1992 Apr; 183(1):179-87. PubMed ID: 1549669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Image quality and breast dose of 24 screen-film combinations for mammography.
    Dimakopoulou AD; Tsalafoutas IA; Georgiou EK; Yakoumakis EN
    Br J Radiol; 2006 Feb; 79(938):123-9. PubMed ID: 16489193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Wiener spectrum of radiographic systems: comparison of different evaluation methods.
    Bregant P; De Denaro M; De Guarrini F; Borasi G
    Radiol Med; 1997 May; 93(5):613-7. PubMed ID: 9251741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Characteristics of Kodak Insight, an F-speed intraoral film.
    Ludlow JB; Platin E; Mol A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Jan; 91(1):120-9. PubMed ID: 11174582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. A comparative evaluation of rare-earth screen-film systems. System speed, contrast, sensitometry, RMS noise, square-wave response function, and contrast-dose-detail analysis.
    Fearon T; Vucich J; Hoe J; McSweeney WJ; Potter BM
    Invest Radiol; 1986 Aug; 21(8):654-62. PubMed ID: 3744739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [Comparative study of screen-film combinations used in conventional radiography].
    Malchair F; Longtain F; Gordenne W
    J Belge Radiol; 1988; 71(4):451-6. PubMed ID: 3215896
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A clinical comparison of different film systems for radiotherapy portal imaging.
    Foulkes KM; Ostwald PM; Kron T
    Med Dosim; 2001; 26(3):281-4. PubMed ID: 11704465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Radiographic mottle and patient exposure in mammography.
    Barnes GT; Chakraborty DP
    Radiology; 1982 Dec; 145(3):815-21. PubMed ID: 7146416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Comparison of the psychophysical properties of various intraoral film and digital systems by means of the perceptibility curve test.
    Yoshiura K; Welander U; McDavid WD; Li G; Shi XQ; Nakayama E; Shimizu M; Okamura K; Kanda S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Mar; 33(2):98-102. PubMed ID: 15314001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [Image contrast in various cassette-screen-film combinations].
    Barth HH; Grasser H
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1985 Dec; 40(12):1230-4. PubMed ID: 3869536
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Quality of film-based and digital panoramic radiography.
    Molander B; Gröndahl HG; Ekestubbe A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jan; 33(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 15140820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Advances in films and screens--T-grain technology.
    Thunthy KH
    LDA J; 1984; 43(3):24. PubMed ID: 6594554
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Clinical evaluation of intensifying screens and films for intraoral radiography].
    Okano T; Yoda E
    Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi; 1983 Mar; 50(1):155. PubMed ID: 6577111
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The LSF and MTF of rare-earth oxysulfide intensifying screens.
    Arnold BA; Eisenberg H; Bjärngard BE
    Radiology; 1976 Nov; 121(2):473-7. PubMed ID: 981630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. A comparison of two mammography film-screen combinations designed for standard-cycle processing.
    McParland BJ
    Br J Radiol; 1999 Jan; 72(853):73-5. PubMed ID: 10341692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [Sharpness of detail and density in film-screen systems].
    Maurer HJ; Goos F
    Rontgenblatter; 1986 Sep; 39(9):260-3. PubMed ID: 3775203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [X-ray image detectors in stomatology].
    Gorelik FG
    Med Tekh; 1998; (6):17-9. PubMed ID: 9949983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Effects of solution depletion on films developed in the Peri-Pro automatic processor.
    Thunthy KH; Weinberg R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Jan; 57(1):102-5. PubMed ID: 6582420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.